Quote
"I can’t think of anything that demonstrates the sovereign nature of the self better than a blog.” - Doc Searls
About the Author
Stowe Boyd is a well-known media subversive,
and an internationally recognized authority on real-time, collaborative
and social technologies. His new blog is Message.
|

Monthly Archives
April 29, 2004
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Had a great chat the other day with Matt Mower (of Evectors, the people who gave us K-Collector). Matt gave a presentation the other day, and although the slides don't do it justice, I thought you might want to take a peek at People-Centered Knowledge Management, which basically states that social tools are becoming the infrastructure for corporate knowledge management. I agree.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
Posted by Stowe Boyd
A collection of stats on SPIM and IM growth:
Marty Schultz [from How to stop IM and SPIM abuse - News - ZDNet]
About 70 percent of all organizations used instant messaging by the end of 2003, according to market research firm Gartner Inc. Gartner predicts that by the end of 2005, instant messaging will surpass e-mail as the primary way people interact electronically.
All this IM growth is spawning rapid proliferation of SPIM, or spam through instant messaging. According to Ferris Research, more than 4 billion SPIM messages--will be sent in 2004. That's up 100 percent from 2003. The Yankee Group estimates that 5 percent to 8 percent of corporate IMs are SPIM.
Higher numbers for SPIM than I have seen before, but the term has started to be used for various sorts of malware that find their way behind the firewall through IM file transfer, not just hustlers in chat rooms.
Note: Marty goes on to make a number of pronouncements about IM use, most of which I profoundly disagree with. "The final step in solidifying your organization against SPIM-based viruses is to centralize, archive and virus check all files being transmitted through Instant Messaging. [Ok] While there are several ways to accomplish this, most organizations have found that prohibiting files from being transmitted through Instant Messaging is the most reliable. The alternative, sending a file over e-mail, is just as convenient and easy as sending the file over Instant Messaging [no it's not]. Most IM management products provide a feature to prohibit files from being transmitted.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Although I have recently switched to an experimental use of Gush (see Another Go At Gush), which logs me into AIM, Yahoo, and MSN as a "multi-headed" client, I recently stumbled across Dead AIM (check out some other screenshots) which supports som cool features, like transparent windows, and popup login notification (pictured above).
[Thanks to Captology for the link]
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
April 28, 2004
Posted by Stowe Boyd
My April Social Commentary column is up at Darwin:
Stowe Boyd [from The Ethics and Etiquette of Social Networks - SOCIAL COMMENTARY]
AS SOCIAL NETWORKING solutions become part of the everyday fabric of business life, we need some guidance at the meta social level. When and how should we apply these tools, and how should we respond to others who are applying them in ways that we don't want to go along with? What are the rules of engagement?
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Culture | Technology
Posted by Stowe Boyd
I received a (nicely) nagging email today from Jenny Ambrozek, asking me to remember to participate in her survey on online communities by May 2. She buttered me up with some praise (which always works with me): Jenny Ambrozek [via email]
Stowe
For the presentation of the survey I have been bothering you about for The Hague Virtual Communities Conference Joe Cothrel and I are working on a time line of key developments 1999-2004. It updates a presentation Joe gave in 1999 that tracked the history to that point: (see his presentation)
Clearly crediting you with the term "social tools" needs to be added. I know the date was 1999 but I thought it was in a Darwin Magazine article.
Looking at your site I found it in "Running Light" that I gather was a newsletter printed by ABuzz that you edited? [it was an issue of Message entitled Social Tools: Business Culture in the Post-Everything Economy]
It rather gets one's attention to see your statement:
"I call these social tools.: software intended to shape business culture."
Stowe Boyd
If you can please advise the correct source so we promulgate truth rather than fiction that would be most appreciated.
Best
Jenny
Conducting survey about state of online community/networks that closes May 2.
[click here for survey]
Thanks, Jenny, for the detective work, and good luck with the survey.
Here's the paragraph with the quote in context: The Rise of Social Tools
The big story of the transformation of business culture isnt the props -- the servers, networks, ten million web sites, and all the information lying around in databases and in HTML -- but what people are saying to each other and how they coordinate their actions, behavior, and goals. The big story is that the global computer network is a enormous chat room, enabling us to collaborate in unexpected, complex, and novel ways. We are experimenting with new social systems, systems that to an unprecedented degree involve software and hardware.
In the 60s it had become unthinkable to run a business without a telephone on every desk. By the late 80s, everyone had to have email. The need for cost justification of these new expenses, at first demanded by management, fell by the wayside as the second-order effects -- the social impacts -- became felt. The rise of PCs has not led to increase in productivity relative to things that people formerly did without PCs, like writing letters and memos, or selling widgets. PCs have decreased productivity in these areas. Why? Because people are spending their time in new activities, activities that were not possible before, and adding new value to the business. And all that comes for a price -- the time spent in the care and feeding of computers, networks, and software.
And at the same time, a new category of software is emerging, software intended to augment social systems. Not to change the company inadvertantly, like email did, when the electronic analog of interoffice mail became something else, grew into something else by changing the way people communicated, and led a change in the structure of the company. No, this generation of software is intentional, designed from the start to guide human behaviour into new paths and patterns, to counter prevailing ways of interaction. I call these social tools: software intended to shape business culture.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Mike Pusateri posts about Xfire, which he calls "Real Social Software", meaning I guess that other stuff isn't.
Mike Pusateri [from Cruft]
In other social software, the software does what the user tells it to do and usually creates a profile about what a person says about themself. Xfire takes this to the next level. It creates a profile about a user actually does, and allows others to see it.
Imagine if you will, running a piece of software that watched what you did online. It could tell where you spent your time online and what you were connected to currently. If you were in an IRC channel, it could point your friends to the IRC channel. If you were posting a lot on a specific message board or wiki, it could tell your friends that's what you'd been up to recently.
It's reasonable to concieve of software could track where you had commented on blogs and keep a record for you or let others see you comments on other blogs. Matt Haughey's Posted Elsewhere could be automated rather than hand crafted.
Yes, there's privacy and control issues. Sure, I don't want people knowing how much time I spend at porn sites either. But those are all solvable problems. The Orku-tribe-sters have been examing those issues ad naseum.
The possibilities go on and on if you start thinking about having an intelligent agent that keeps track of your net wanderings. Xfire is the first of a new breed of social software. A breed where the burden of work is removed from human and placed in the hands of the software, allowing the human to focus on the fun and interesting things.
I rambled on Xfire a few months ago (as Ross Mayfield noted in his nod to Cruft's posting.)
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
Posted by Stowe Boyd

Scott Allen (of Online Business Networks) is presenting a "teleclass" on the application of Linkedin today at 12pm PT. I bet the material will be generally applicable to other social networking solutions, as well. Check it out and sign up at LinkedIn Unleashed.
[11:15 am ET: Updated URL to the right page for registering for the teleclass]
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Events
Posted by Stowe Boyd
A not-so-surprising result from a recent study by FaceTime and IDC: banning IM use does not necessarily lead to non-use.
[from Banning Instant Messaging does not reduce business risks]
FaceTime Communications and IDC have conducted a joint survey into Instant Messaging security. This shows that most organisations which prohibit Instant Messaging in the enterprise fail to address critical network security, information security and regulatory compliance risks posed by its unauthorised use among workers.
36 percent of the survey's respondents reported that IM is prohibited by their organisations, but only 17 percent of those prohibiting IM reported having a solution in place to block usage. Public IM clients can easily be downloaded and used by workers without IT knowledge or control unless IM blocking solutions have been implemented.
Business people know that IM is an effective form of communication, and so when the corporate bozos attempt to prohibit a flexible and effective form of communication -- the only one availble, mind you, that is presence-based -- guess what? Many decide to download IM clients anyway.
The implied solution, though, by FaceTime (and others of its ilk, like IMlogic, Akonix, and Zonelabs) is software that will actually block IM use. If that is applied as part of the roll-out of a corporate, secure IM solution, I am all for it. But the lose-lose case -- where the company shuts down all IM use -- is simply stupid. But we should never underestimate the power of human stupidity, or the willingness of the establishment to prohibit innovative and dangerous ideas.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
Posted by Stowe Boyd
A question from Derek Lomas, regarding the impact of a recent court case, where US District Court Judge Steven D. Merryday ruled that aggregation of web content may not be blocked -- in all cases -- by copyright (see Judge on Search: Copyright Doesn't Cover All Web Sites).
The case revolved around aggregation of boat information from a variety of copyrighted sites by Nautical Solutions, Inc., which presented this aggregation of information to prospective buyers of yachts. The judge argued that the presentation of factual information about the boats was lawful, and that the rights to the pictures and other information were really held by the yacht owners, not those hosting the web sites where the information was being presented.
So -- in response to Derek's question -- my sense is that information about individuals that is made accessible in various social networking and /or dating sites may be subject to the same interpretation.
This opens the door to possible spidering of social networking/dating sites for purposes analogous to those of Nautical Solutions in the boating world. What you are entering about your goals, desires, likes, and dislikes in business partners or soulmates may turn out to not be copyrightable -- it may simply be ruled to be "factual information" and not protected, as a result.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Law
April 26, 2004
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Joe Hildebrand of Jabber mentioned that he had blogged on Gush.
Joe Hildebrand
He also makes a list of recommendations, and I agree with several, particularly those focused on the RSS feeds and getting multiuser chat working.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
Posted by Stowe Boyd
The folks at 2Entwine have released v1.1 of Gush, with a long list of new features, in particular support for gateways to connect with AIM, Yahoo, and MSN, presence notifications, and improved RSS support in the included blog reader. I reviewed an earlier version a few months back (see Gushing for Gush).
I have shifted over to testing Gush v1.1 extensively, and I have imported AIM, and MSN contacts into the client -- aside from a few small confusions, it seems to work (although the AIM nicknames got scrambled somehow, and I had to rekey them). Like Trillian, Gush now can serve as a single client, linking to all the networks, plus Jabber, which is the native protocol.
I really like the notifications panel (look right), which is a window that hovers within the app's desktop, and indicates your buddies comings and goings.
The RSS reader has been drastically extended, and supports thumbnails and full size photos from RSS feeds. Really awesome.
Like I said in the earlier article, I would like everyone to download this client. The ability to create 'announcements' for the various groups on your buddy list is a real breakthrough. With the integration with AIM, Yahoo, and MSN, as well as external Jabber accounts, Gush supports broadcasting of those announcements -- a feature that I like, but which I learned about the hard way last week. I thought I was sending an announcement to Gush users, but my entire AIM contact list learned about my plnas for a West Coast trip. No sweat, and I like the ability to broadcast to a group -- no matter what service they are on! However, to be able to browse the announcements as if they were blog entires, you need a Gush client, and I guess, a Gush login id.
Get one, and send your contact info along to me. I am trying to develop a buddy list for Get Real readers, and user that as a means of keeping in the loop with you'all... better than email, for sure. And Gush -- while habit forming -- is still free.
Comments (1)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
April 23, 2004
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Social networking is definitely going mainstream. I see in Variety that a reality show is being developed based on people meeting through social networking service MySpace. [Note: the article led me to sign up for MySpace, and I will review it soon. At first glance, very impressive.]
Ben Fritz [from Variety.com - Reality dating skein in dot-com Pipeline]
Reality producer Pipeline Entertainment is working with social networking Web site MySpace to develop its second reality series based on a successful dot-com.
Pipeline already produces syndie strip "Classmates," distributed by Twentieth Television and based on the Web site Classmates.com. Prexy Matthew Papish is co-creator of the syndie reality show "Blind Date."
New skein, which is being shopped to distributors and networks, will feature real-life meetings of participants on MySpace, which like the better-known Friendster connects people through common acquaintances and common interests. Depending on studio needs, show may feature more lighthearted fare for daytime or sexier content for latenight and could run daily or weekly.
In the increasingly chilly environment for sexy material in entertainment, don't be surprised if the reality of SNA-channeled dating is watered down, or at least pixelated.
Comments (2)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category:
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Looks like Skype p2p VOIP is getting integrated into Kazaa. Is that a killer combination, or just a way to force the government to intercede into VoIP?
Don't forget that Skype is both a VoIP system *and* instant messaging client. Presence-enabling Kazaa file sharing seems like a no-brainer (I wonder why that hasn't been done already). My worry is that Kazaa's messes will tarnish anything that comes into contact with it, so p2p in general, VoIP telephony and instant messaging are all going to become slightly more disreputable becuase of this.
Andy Abramson [from [ VoIP Watch: SKYPE Gets More P2P Like]
Reports in BoardWatch are that Skype is working with the current parent of Kazaa to integrate a file sharing on a P2P basis. Ouch.
That could be the fastest way to get the regulators into the fray once copyrighted content starts being moved back and forth, in my opinion.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Telecommunications
April 22, 2004
Posted by Stowe Boyd
To incent folks to sign up for the mailing list here at Get Real (look over there in the left margin), I am offering a free copy of my upcoming report on Social Networking to those that register. You will also get a chance to participate in a survey on the same topics, and see the results long before they are generally made available.
Tell your friends!
Comments (3)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category:
April 21, 2004
Posted by Stowe Boyd
I recently reviewed the v3.0 release of Groove, very favorably (see Groove 3.0: A Tool For Our Times). In a recent interview by Thomas Claburn, Ray Ozzie of Groove Networks makes a number of interesting comments about Groove's 3.0, rich clients in general and other stuff, including Skype, of all things (I wonder if he is an investor, or just loves all things peer-to-peer).
Thomas Claburn [from InformationWeek]
InformationWeek: Have we moved beyond the desktop metaphor to a shared desktop?
Ozzie: I guess what I would say, at a very high level, is I'm a very big believer in the rich desktop. We started many years ago with a belief in mainframes and decentralization of systems. Then we went through a PC era where end users were extremely pleased with the empowerment they got by having software on their desktops.
Then in the Web era, the pendulum swung back again to centralized control and centralized app deployment. And that was very good for many reasons. Particularly in enterprises, you get economies of scale by doing things in a centralized manner.
But I think the pendulum has swung back, or at least into the middle, where people are realizing that decentralization, in a world of ubiquitous networks, in a world of highly mobile individuals, this concept of decentralized systems and decentralization is of increasing relevance. And it's of relevance in our case to communications and collaboration between people. In the telecom world, I don't know if you've every heard of Skype, but that's an example of how decentralization and decentralized architectures are impacting telephony. Ubiquitous networks and rich clients can be very, very, very valuable.
I am an equally strong advocate for rich clients, and think that Groove 3.0 is a big step forward (especially when contrasted with 2.5), but there is still a long way for Groove to go.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
Posted by Stowe Boyd
VCs in Silicon Valley are restructuring at a fast pace, these days, and founders are getting lost in the shuffle. I just posted a piece on the founder of Plaxo, Sean Parker, being pushed out in some sort of tug-of-war with the investors.
Jonathan Abrams, founder of Friendster, has also been moved out of the driver's seat, but the transition holds less drama.
Matt Marshall [from The Mercury News]
Abrams, it seems, is faring better than Parker. He apparently did not fight the guillotine, agreeing immediately with the change.
He'll remain founder at the company, working with interim Chief Executive Tim Koogle to find a full-time replacement, according to Friendster spokeswoman Lisa Kopp.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category:
Posted by Stowe Boyd
I see that Plaxo has hit another patch of bad press, this time regarding the apparent unfriendly departure (or lock out?) of the founder, Sean Parker.
Matt Marshall [from The Mercury News]
The company sent out an anonymous, terse statement that Parker is ``no longer with Plaxo,'' but called him a ``visionary, creative entrepreneur'' and ended with: ``We thank him for his hard work and wish him well.''
In reality, though, a source said Parker has been locked out, and everyone at the company has been instructed not to talk with Parker, except by way of the company's lawyer, Ray Hickson.
When contacted and asked whether this arrangement is ``normal,'' Hickson said: ``I can't discuss a client personnel matter with newspaper reporters.''
Parker himself issued a terse statement: ``While the company is moving to a new stage of its growth, the management team remains committed to executing my original vision,'' he said. ``The company remains in capable hands.''
Many of the players concerned wouldn't comment for this article.
While I am a user of Plaxo, and have argued for the use of 'contact unmanagement' solutions long and loud. I have had a hard time getting the business model of Plaxo. When I spoke with various representatives of the company a few months ago in California, they seemed bound and determined to not push into near-term and obvious opportunities to monetize Plaxo's growing user base.
For example, the social networking avenue for Plaxo seems obvious and natural, but the folks I met with seemed uninterested. Perhaps they were great actors, pulling the wool over my eyes, and they have a plan in the back room to attack that market.
But if you have 1M+ users (a threshold they crossed in December), I can imagine a number of ways to meter the product to make money, epsecially when you already have a peer-to-peer infrastructure and a client integrated into Outlook on the customer's desktop. Better alternatives to today's messaging mess, for example, with Plaxo acting as a trusted intermediary for digital identity management, or a peer-to-peer real-time messaging capability.
At any rate, the folks running the show there now [which better not be "Anonymous" for long] will either figure out a way to ramp up a financial model, or else we might soon be uninstalling the Plaxo client.
Mentioned by Joi Ito and Jason Calacanis, too.
Comments (1)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Business
April 19, 2004
Posted by Stowe Boyd
I had a great trip to BloggerCon II. Aside from the fact that Harvard is not prepared for an overly warm day in April (air conditioning was inadequate for the mob), the event was otherwise great. Saw a lot of existing friends and "equiantances."
The high point of the symposium for me was the session on "The Business of Blogging" (not to be confused with "Blogging in Business"), led by Jeff Jarvis. I was amazed to discover that we at Corante are in the vanguard of bloggers, inasmuchas we are already deriving measurable revenue from ad-based sponsorship (see the right column, if you haven't noticed them already).
My participation in Jeff's session led to several chats, later, with bloggers and reporters about the fact that the new media of blogging is adopting (or absorbing) some of the traditional financial models of traditional media.
Julie Haggerty [from The New York Times]
But the most talked about route to profit was selling advertisements that pay by the month or by the number of blog visits. Boing Boing (www.boingboing.net), one of the most popular blogs on the Web with its musings by four freelance writers, is considering adding sponsors as a way to offset its server fees of about $1,000 a month.
But observers wonder how advertising - the lifeblood of mainstream newspapers and magazines - will affect the grass-roots-sensibility of Boing Boing and other blogs.
"It all comes down to personal integrity," Mr. Jarvis said. "If you trust and like and read Boing Boing because you trust and like and read it, there is no reason you wouldn't continue to read them because someone is paying for their server."
Bloggers, like Stowe Boyd, who posts at www.corante.com/getreal/, have no problem reviewing products with one hand and soliciting sponsors with the other. Mr. Boyd, who came to the conference from Reston, Va., makes most of his income as a consultant on collaborative technologies, but credits his blog with about $3,000 in advertising revenue each month. "They can't get me to turn around and promote their product," he said. "It's all my agenda."
Before advertisers will flock to blogs, Mr. Jarvis said, bloggers will need to develop data on who is visiting their site, and how often. "I don't want to blow up a bubble here and say this is going to be huge," Mr. Jarvis said." The beauty of it is it is small and it's in the hands of the people."
Henry Copeland, founder of BlogAds, a service that provides classified advertising for Web logs, is even more confident. He predicted that blogs that are making $5,000 a month will be making five or six times that a year from now. Soon, advertisers will be able to say "I want to buy ads on 25 different Web logs in Southern California written by women who drive humvees," and have the perfect audience at their fingertips, he said.
I was unaware that so few bloggers are making money -- in fact, for many semi-successful bloggers the hobby can take a big bite out of their wallet when a spike in readership leads to additional fees from a hosting provider.
Two important outgrowths of the conference for me:
- Jeff Jarvis' session led to a straw poll suggesting as a next step that we form a 'blogging business association' to establish guidelines, collectively bargain for insurance (and other services), and lobby for the 'blogging fringe' of the media marketplace.
- I hope to kick off a seminar series (with the sponsorship and support of Corante) to help bloggers turn the corner on becoming a 'professional blogger' -- for which a full definition is still in development. There is no replacement for great content, but content is not enough. I hope to show others how to put the pieces together so blogging can more than just a solitary obsession, and perhaps enough of a paying proposition so you can quit your day job.
For more information on the seminars, or to get information in general from Get Real, please register in the 'Subscribe' box in the left margin.
Comments (6)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Events | Media
April 16, 2004
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Headed off to BloggerCon tomorrow for a day with friends and colleagues. Hope to see you there!
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Media
Posted by Stowe Boyd
I saw that Julian Dibbell reported that he is making nearly $50K buying and selling imaginary ("virtual") goods related to the Ultima online game. This has been covered in Wired, and Terra Nova.
Why does this seem more far-fetched than the market for ad-words, or people buying subscriptions for a virtual "pay-for-involvement" with edgy, sexily tattooed women at Suicide Girls, or subteens paying to read the bogus blogs of teeny dolls (as reported in today's WSJ)?
For some reason, the ground seems to have shifted under my feet. But then again, a year ago I didn't expect to have sponsors at my blog, either.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
April 15, 2004
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Rumors are making the rounds about Yahoo's Business Messenger service. It seems (I have been told) that the Yahoo BM team have been sent home and all business activities surrounding the offering have been halted. I will ping my contacts there to see what gives.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
Posted by Stowe Boyd
One of the many email addresses that Zero Degrees' Outlook plug-in found yesterday (see earlier piece), was the 'secret' email address that TypePad provides to post entries to Typepad blogs. So I discovered an entry at my www.aworkingmodel.com website (which is a TypePad blog) that is an invitation to Zero Degrees.
Check it out: A Working Model: Connect with me in ZeroDegrees?.
I discovered this because Jason Hardebeck, a friend who had the same circumstances befall him, posted a comment on the entry, and I was notified by email. Sheesh. As he says in the comment, it will take weeks before the impacts of installing this "virus" are all cleaned up.
[Note: Got a warning from Peter Quintas, of Silk Road, that the "click here for more information" link created by Zero Degrees in the email (now disabled) exposed my secret email address, so people could have posted who knows what at my company website.]
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
Posted by Stowe Boyd
[2004-08-23 Update: Jas Dhillon's comments of 22 August, and my clarification are presented in a new entry.]
[2004-08-21 Update: recent flapdoodle over Multiply has led to a lot of new hits on this story -- see Slicing Social Spam Both Ways. I don't believe that email invitations to join social software is "spam", in the sense that it is generally used, a point I did not make clear in this piece, although I did use it in scare quotes.]
Yesterday, I hoped to review the new Outlook plug-in from Zero Degrees. But what happened is a bit more than I expected.
First, the tool supports finding uncaptured email addresses in messages -- which sounds like a helpful feature. I ran that, and discovered a few hundred email addresses that could be helpful to save, although a lot of them were various 'support' and 'info' addresses from emails directed to me from online services and product companies. Wading through them to decide which ones to keep permanently is a chore that I was not ready to face.
But I thought it would be good to upload my contacts to Zero Degrees' server -- as a backup, before proceeding with other contact housekeeping. However, Zero Degrees -- apparently in response to customer requests to simplify the use of the tool -- has made uploading and inviting all contacts as single step process! As a result, my one mouse click led to hundreds (maybe 1000+) people getting invited to join my Zero Degrees network.
If you are one of the many that I have 'socially spammed' -- apologies. Be warned if you are signing up that the Outlook plug-in has potentially unexpected consequences for users.
It is interesting to see how many positive responses this has led to, however. At least 30 people have signed up to Zero Degrees as a result of the invitations, so far. I have received dozens of rejection emails, as well, associated with out of date email addresses -- which Zero Degrees does not manage in any way. I also have several 'please remove me from your mailing list' requests, and several folks have deflected the invite with a counter invitation to LinkedIn or Spoke.
The Zero Degrees service has many attractive features -- which I will review at a later date, once the dust has settled on this little contretemps -- and has attracted a lot of positive comments from those who have signed up. But the company will have to reinstitute the multi-step, checks-and-balance approach for the Outlook plug-in: in the meantime, don't click the button to upload all your contacts!
[Note: I see Ross Mayfield is warning folks over at Many2Many.]
[Note: I see Chris Allen got burned, too.]
Comments (13)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
April 13, 2004
Posted by Stowe Boyd
TrendIQ has been measuring "internet presence" of the Social Networking meme over at Social-all, which I mentioned recently.
Looks like LinkedIn has been getting a lot of buzz, recently.
Comments (1)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category:
April 12, 2004
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Got an email, feedback to my recent piece on Dogster: Ted Rheingold I'm Ted Rheingold and among other things I do the site Dogster. Clearly you think about net-based communities quite a lot. Therefore I'm pleased to see that you get Dogster for what it is. One of the reasons I originally liked the idea of Dogster so much is that it is a sharing site w/o having to risk offense. Visitors leave with positive connections (e.g. "that dog CornNut is so cute") without having to expend any personal commitment. And when they come back the dogs are waiting like good dogs just as they were before, but perhaps w/ more pictures or info ;)
Ted R.
nb: No one knows you're a human on dogster!
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
April 09, 2004
Posted by Stowe Boyd
I have recently been fiddling with a group of interesting file sharing technologies, such as Groove's new v3.0 release and the beta release from Shinkuro.
The goal of file sharing is simplicity itself: to create a means to 'share' files between different PCs or individuals. The meaning of 'share' in that sentence can vary greatly, however. It might mean 'quickly copying updates made at one location to the remote versions of the file elsewhere' in the most basic case, up to and including 'coediting the document in a web conferencing setting.'
I am interested in the baseline meaning of file 'sharing'. This notably excludes the so-called file 'sharing' supported by many instant messaging systems which is really a misnomer applied to file transfer.
So I have taken a look at three other file sharing solutions: FolderShare, CleverCactus, and the file sharing aspects of Mirra's personal server technology.
...continue reading.
Comments (4)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
April 07, 2004
Posted by Stowe Boyd
I got several pings in the past day or so about Microsoft's Channel 9, a group blog set up to better connect to the developer community. Looks interesting, although there is a lot of chatter within the userbase about the site itself -- how its configured, the UI, and so on -- that suggests it is very much a work in progress, although very promising.
One news piece at Computerworld on the site demonstrated the conflation of the "social networking" term to include various non-networking social tools, like blogs and wikis.
[ from Microsoft's Channel 9 gets social with developers - Computerworld]
Microsoft Corp. has quietly expanded its Microsoft Developer Network with a Web site that combines a host of social networking technologies in a move to improve communications with outside software developers.
The Web site, called Channel 9, uses weblogs, mobile blogs, wikis and forums as well as other technologies to reach out to developers. The site was created by a group of five engineers and technology evangelists at Microsoft; it was named after the United Airlines in-flight audio channel that allows passengers to listen in on cockpit communications.
But there is no explicit social networking technology whatsoever. The term will soon be so overused that no meaningful residue of its initial meaning will remain.
Comments (2)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
Posted by Stowe Boyd

I really like the Vodafone flash demo that shows all sort of sci-fi gizmos of the immediate future.
Check out the flash paper with a local map with buddies' presence on it.
Likewise, the demo shows all sorts of applications of presence, real-time messaging, and collaboration. A kid jamming with his friends remotely is also cool, and digital posters and billboards on all the walls.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Clay Shirky manages to salvage more than a good laugh from Peter St Andre and Joe Hildebrand's April Fools joke.
Clay Shirky [from Many-to-Many: POKE in the Eye With A Sharp Stick]
So I have become bored bored bored with the April Fools stuff by and large, but I was struck by how much conceptual similarity the joke Jabber spec, Presence Obtained via Kinesthetic Excitation (POKE), bears to Matt Webbs Glancing. Ive been using Apples iChat as my IM client for a while now, and am addicted to the gentle whuff sound as users enter and leave presence-space, so while POKE is meant to be ridiculous, its about 80% of the way to something real, something that both Webb and iChat are getting at relying on the limbic system for presence awareness.
I go with that. I really like the subtle cues that most IM systems offer to indicate that buddys of various flavors are coming and going. That sense of social co-presence is a great context enrichment device, especially when this operates at a nearly unconscious level, like people moving around in a physically shared loft space.
One of the interesting 'etiquette' issues is how to propose a conversation to someone, and an obvious opening 'stroke' is the virtual analog of the physical observation of someone coming into your shared space: 'good morning, how are you?" This opens the possibility of interaction without the pressure to do so. But the cue of 'entering' social shared space is necessary, otherwise any approach can be perceived as an intrusion, as opposed to a welcome.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
April 05, 2004
Posted by Stowe Boyd
A new competitor to Plaxo (and the other "contact unmanagement" vendors) has come on the scene: Midentity.
I was prepared to like Midentity. Screen shots (like the one to the right) showed a rich client experience, and the walk through demo at the website painted a Plaxo-ish picture of not having to update your contact information manually anymore. Esther Dyson is promoting it, so I swallowed and took the plunge.
[from The Web Belongs To Us by Abaigail Townsend]
During the original dot-com boom, Esther Dyson was the first lady of the internet. Unlike many of her contemporaries, the technology sage, who has made her name over the past decade as a trend-spotter, never went away. Her latest idea is that the web is no longer the domain of corporations: it's set to become all about you and me.
"We're all narcissists," she asserts. "If you go to anybody's house, there are pictures all around the place. It's the human element. The web's going to become a place for individuals."
Ms Dyson is talking at the launch of Midentity, a "personal digital identity" specialist that wants to cash in on this new dawn. The internet is no longer new or hi-tech. It's just there - in people's offices, in their homes and in their lives - as unimpressive as the phone.
But the actual experience of Midentity is not so much narcissistic as it is user-centric.
Midentity is in fact very easy to download and get running. Importing my contacts from Outlook also proved to be a snap, and as advertised, Midentity runs as a client on your desktop. It is easy to search for contacts, and to organized them into groups (as I did with Hylton and Britton (see the screenshot)). [Note to Microsoft folks: Please add groups to Outlook contact management.]
I presume that the updating features work as described.
Given the fact that I have an implicit network of Midentity users, I don't know why they decided not to provide presence and instant messaging as a core feature. I thought in fact that the "txt" icon represented text messaging, but it seems that it is intended only for sending text messages to cell phones. Very odd. And for this service you have to purchase credits (like phone tokens). Is this some UK-oriented service that I don't get? Are these credits cheaper than doing this some other way, there? The dialog box wants to charge my credit card in pounds, so there may be an explanation of a sort in there somewhare, but I don't get it.
Why would I use this? I have instant messaging services galore to IM people, which include passing messages to cell phones, and all which serve up presence information. While I might like to have contact management capabilities linked with my already installed buddy lists from AOL, Yahoo, and MSN, why would I go down this path?
This may be more of a feature request to the IM services rather than a first take on Midentity, per se. This functionality should be offered by MSN, Yahoo, and AOL as part of the unending war between the services.
I have a hard time understanding why I would use Midentity, aside from exploiting the features that directly overlap with Plaxo et al for contact management. And Plaxo operates within Outlook, relatively unobtrusively.
So Midentity's rich client seems like an awfully heavy footprint for features that could be integrated into Outlook. Without instant messaging and presence, the Midentity client is just a tease of this that might have been.
[Update 1:14pm -- An additional feature just presented itself. The client announces email as it arrives by popping up a small alert near the Windows toolbar, including name and subject. Cool.]
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Social networking has really gotten down to basics: tail sniffing. Ted Rheingold has launched Dogster.com, and has 9,000 dogs signed up.

Julian Guthrie
[from Internet Goes To The Dogs]
Online networking, one of the fastest growing segments of the Web, attracts millions of dollars in venture capital and millions of users angling for a personal or professional connection. Sites such as LinkedIn, ZeroDegrees, Ryze and Friendster connect friends of friends. Dogster connects friends of dogs.
"It's all about love of dog,'' said Dogster founder Ted Rheingold, a 33- year-old dot-com survivor who spends his days building Web applications for corporate clients and weekends creating his own, more whimsical sites.
The popularity of Dogster reflects a more tail-wagging, egalitarian era of the Internet today, Rheingold believes. He wants to keep the site folksy and focused and is not seeking venture capital. Instead, he hopes merely to recoup out-of-pocket expenses, such as the $200 a year Web hosting fees.
And people wonder if there is a viable business model for social networking. Ha!
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
April 04, 2004
Posted by Stowe Boyd
The inestimable A J Kim mentioned that she'd done a presentation at the Game Developers Conference. Check it out.
A J collates trends in mobile phone adoption and use, especially by "Mobiles": A J Kim [from The Network is the Game: Social Trends in Mobile Entertainment]
2. Mobiles self-organize into fluid, loose-knit groups
Ethnographic research shows that mobile users (age 15-30) participate in dynamic overlapping social groups (e.g. family, friends, colleagues) that they maintain via cellphone
Contrast this with MMP players (e.g. SWG, Everquest, Lineage) who belong to a single clan and pursue activities within that group
From a business perspective, groups provide an entry point for new players + a retention driver for existing players
Groups tend to move en-mass from game to game (or venue to venue)
Mobiles are the leading edge of the future wave of personal communication. All businesses should be tracking what is going on there, not just the people directly selling them game minutes, dating services, or mobility solutions. This will be the beachhead for many advertsing avenues, which will transition to locational and 'tribal' models. At least the winners will.

Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Art & Entertainment | Technology
April 03, 2004
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Just my luck. Now that I have *finally* established contact with Meg Hourihan at Kinja, it turns out she will be leaving in the next few weeks.
Nick Denton
[From Nick Denton's blog]
Might as well get all the news out in one day. Once Kinja's bedded down, Meg Hourihan will be moving on. Meg's been project director since the start of the site, and what you see is her creation, along with the engineering team of Gina, Jim, Mark and Matt. I'm just the guy who writes the checks, and insists on pretty icons.
We're not going to refill the position, but have been searching for a Chief Technology Officer. Now that we've launched, most of the issues we'll face over the next few months will be to do with hardware, and scaling the system. We need a CTO with experience running high-volume high-availability sites. We have a couple of candidates, but the search is still open. If you're interested in the role, or know someone who would be a good fit, please email me at nick@gawker.com. I'll send the job specs.
As for future directions of the product... Meg, as well as remaining as chair of Kinja's board, will continue to consult. 37signals, the interface design consultancy, will be taking an ongoing role. And you can also send me your wishlists.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
April 02, 2004
Posted by Stowe Boyd
I am working (slowly, much too slowly) on the structure of the "social networking applications in the enterprise" report. One central theme of the report will be a partitioning of offerings against the four quadrants of the Buying X Invited model (a matrix based on the two questions, 1/ who is invited, and 2/ who is buying?)
Here's an attempt at partitioning the current list I have collected of non-dating services (note: dating services all fall into quadrants 3 and 4, I think). Some of the services span quadrants, as when there is a free, more limited service and a for-fee service with more functionality.
Biggest fallout is by Enterprise v Individual making the buy decision, but I expect that to be increasingly murky as enterprises roll-out solutions for internal and external use.
ActiveNet (Tacit): Q1, Q2
Contact Network: Q1, Q2
Ecademy: Q3, Q4
Eurekster: Q2/Q3 (public access, subsidized by ads?)
Flikr (Ludicorp): Q2, Q3 (maybe also to be sold into Q1/Q2?)
Friendity: Q2, Q3
Friendster: Q2, Q3
Frusic: Q2, Q3
Funchain: Q2, Q3
Graw Group: Q2, Q3 (hypothetical)
Huminity: Q2, Q4
ICQ Universe: Q2/Q3 (public access, subsidized by ads?)
InterAction (Interface Software): Q1, Q2
K-Bus SNA (Entopia): Q1, Q2
LinkedIn: Q3, Q4
LinkSV: Q1, Q2
Metails: Q3, Q4
OpenBC: Q3, Q4
Orkut (Google): Q3, Q4 (sponsored by ads?)
Polypol (WhoGlue): Q1, Q2
ReferNet: Q3, Q4
Ryze: Q3, Q4
Small Planet: Q3, Q4 (subsidized by colllective buying)
Spoke Software: Q1, Q2 AND Q3, Q4 (two distinct business models!)
Tribe.net: Q3, Q4 (subsidized through classified ads?)
Visible Path: Q1, Q2
Zaibatsu (Always-On): Q3, Q4
ZeroDegrees: Q3, Q4 (who knows where it all ends know that its part of InterActive (see earlier blurb)).
I also plan to break out infrastructure players -- those who are presenting technology to support other's business plans. Several of the existing SNAs in the list above may be trending in this direction, but several companies are clearly in the infrstructure space, looking for partners or market niches to focus on.
Infrastructure:
E-Friends (Altrasoft) (SNA in a box)
Fonetango (mobile phone tech)
Gush (2Entwine) (IM-based)
WiredReach (p2p SNA technology)
Zopto (SNA plug-ins for blogging)
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category:
Posted by Stowe Boyd
I see that Yusef Mehdi, the Microsoft executive "in charge of figuring out the company's portal strategy" believes that an IM network like MSN is almost a social networking solution, already:
Yusef Mehdi [from CNET News.com]
Truth to be told, MSN Messenger is just effectively a couple of simple tweaks away from becoming a social network, because you have all your buddies and your buddies know who their buddies are. This is the ability to actually connect the two, and it's very, very close. The only thing that is not there is just an extension for which I could see my friends' friends.
And of course, they already have millions of users logged in every day.
Comments (5)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Margaret Fleck, a researcher at HP, has developed technology that automatically captions photos based on what you and your friends say about them in online chat.
[from NewScientist.com]
Digital photography is booming, and people are storing ever greater volumes of photos on the hard drives of their PCs. The trouble is that people rarely label their photos.
This is the weak link for digital photo collections," says Margaret Fleck at HP's lab in Palo Alto. "In 10 years' time, finding something amongst them will be very difficult."
Fleck's answer is to tap into the wealth of information in the conversations we have when we talk about our photos with friends. She says the stories we tell do not merely describe the photo, but also talk about the events that happened before and after the picture was taken.
To harness this information, Fleck has developed software that records these conversations to hard disc, converts the speech to text using a speech-recognition program, and then extracts keywords with which the photos are captioned and indexed.
Immediately you see the possibilities outside of photo captions: any sort of group review would be immensely improved by automatic capture of salient commentary.
I have been on the trail of an 'assistantbot' that I know someone told me about a few years ago. This bot would attend chat meetings and capture action items, and them post an email to the attendees afterward. I want that. Anyone know who built it, or talked about it?
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Marc Eisenstadt of the Open University, wrote some well-modulated and well-meaning advice for my future webcasts, and sent a pointer to a presentation of his on BuddySpace, "an open-source cross-platform Instant Messaging and geo-location tool called BuddySpace, which provides multiple views of collaborative workgroups based on the concept of 'active dots on geographically-accurate detailed maps', and augmented by a variety of semantically-based services."
Take a look. Unlike my recent meandering webcast on Social Tools (which ran 55 minutes!), Marc's is a concise and insightful exposition on BuddySpace.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Amy Jo Kim (who is much more in touch with movers and shakers than I seem to be, and who is guest blogging at Many2Many) let me know that Linda Stone (quoted yesterday in Continuous Partial Attention) is no longer at Microsoft. The article I quoted was a year or so old, but the meme of CPA seems to be hot again, perhaps ignited by Joi Ito's rapping about it.
Looks like she is doing other great things:
[from Wired (November 2003)]
Linda Stone: Former Microsoft ambassador; currently advises the power elite and consults for Segway's Dean Kamen.
Node Cred: Old-school network. Stone, 48, directed strategic initiatives at Apple and Microsoft through the late '80s and '90s; her reputation for having the ear of people like Amazon founder Jeff Bezos and ex-Apple CEO John Sculley prompted Steve Ballmer to enlist her to soften Redmond's image.
Know your enemy: Stone brought the barbarians through the gate and straight to the podium, starting a Microsoft speaker series that featured open source maven Eric Raymond and copyleft theorist (and Wired columnist) Lawrence Lessig.
Secret Weapon: The dinner party. "I've developed a seating algorithm. I don't think of who will sit next to whom, but who sits diagonally. I make sure people with high energy are thoughtfully distributed. I scatter them, so one corner of the table is always lighting up."
Speed Dial: General Wesley Clark and Danny Hillis.
Node wisdom: Stone coined the phrase "continuous partial attention," popularized several years later at the 2001 World Economic Forum. CPA describes a key characteristic of the node life. "With CPA, we focus on the topic at hand but are constantly scanning the periphery for new input and adjusting our attention accordingly. It's different than multitasking. It's knowing when to hit call-waiting and when to ignore it.
If anyone out there is in touch with Linda, could you point her to me or vice versa. I would like to see where she stands on CPA these days. Could be a fun interview.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
April 01, 2004
Posted by Stowe Boyd
I saw (in a NY Times piece by David Gallegher) that Kinja has gone live with a beta, and after fddling around with it for few minutes (see my digest) I had an aggregation of a few of my favorite blogs up and running.
Kinja turns out to have none of the social networking flavor that I anticipated (see recent blurt: "Rumors of Kinja"), but instead looks like a blog aggregation for those who a/ don't know anything about blogs, or b/ don't want to use more compact representation of blog content.
Still have to wait and see if Kinja is plotting something around social networks. Check out the screenshot -- looks like there is something social going on with "friends and favorites." Where its headed, I don't know. And Meg Hourihan won't answer my emails...
Earlier today I stumbled across Pluck, which is an IE plugin RSS aggregator that runs in a panel in the browser. Way easier to use than Kinja.
Comments (3)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
Posted by Stowe Boyd
I saw in TidBITS that iChat is adding MSN support, at least in a beta form: "Apple today released a public beta of iChat AV 2.2, the company's popular instant-messaging and audio/video conferencing application. In addition to providing a handful of bug fixes, the update incorporates support for Microsoft's MSN text messaging network." The pound of flesh? Environmental Marketing: "In a deal worked out between Apple and Microsoft, chat sessions between iChat and MSN clients will include "short, targeted, and relevant" promotional messages within text chats; the text appears in the same gray, sans-serif text used to display timestamps and other system messages (such as "Direct Instant Message session started")." Ugh. But someone's got to pay the piper.
[Note: See the comments -- turns out to have been an April Fools joke!]
Comments (5)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category:
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Clay weighs in on Rusty Foster's musings regarding gated participation in open web discourse.
Apparently, a recent flare-up of jerks at Kuro5hin led to a reexamination of how to gradually allow individuals to accumulate various sorts of 'power' at Kuro5hin, and to increase the penalties for being affiliated with jerks. For example, if people need sponsors to become part of the network, and then go rogue, both the rogues and their sposnors can be boosted off the system. Raising the stakes will slow down the rate of jerks coming aboard.
We are likely headed for increasingly 'gated' (or 'gaited') communities, where you need a pass to get in and/or you pay for the privilege of participation. I for one am tired or scaping out all the blog spam every week, and that would be rectified by making this a gated community -- at least to get the privilege of posting comments.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
|
|