Quote
"I can’t think of anything that demonstrates the sovereign nature of the self better than a blog.” - Doc Searls
About the Author
Stowe Boyd is a well-known media subversive,
and an internationally recognized authority on real-time, collaborative
and social technologies. His new blog is Message.
|

Monthly Archives
October 29, 2004
Posted by Stowe Boyd
A recent Pew Internet study discovered that 33 million American internet users have reviewed or rated something as part of an online rating system
As more Americans use the internet for entertainment, for building personal relationships, and as a tool for conducting business, online rating systems have become a significant element of internet use.
The Pew Internet & American Life Project has found that 26% of adult internet users in the U.S., more than 33 million people, have rated a product, service, or person using an online rating system. These systems, also referred to as reputation systems, are online applications that allow users to express their opinions and read opinions posted by other participants.
And no surprise, the younger you are, the more likely you are to have rated something online.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
Posted by Stowe Boyd
I bumped into the Scopo at Future Now.
I have wanted this gizmo for years.
The screen is what forces PC manufacturers to make laptop PCs so large. Once wearable displays like the Scopo are affordable, the PC can become a small brick that stays in your shoulder bag, communicating by wireless (a la bluetooth) with your display and keyboard.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Ross has a great piece where he introduces the term Middlespace:
Ross Mayfield [from Many-to-Many - Middlespace]
Bottom-up phenomena has [sic] accelerated in recent years because of social software. A relatively simple decentralized pattern of enabling more connections and groups to form has complex results. These results (for example: open source, the long tail, heterarchical organization, emergent democracy, wikipedia and participatory media) hold great promise. Bottom-up production is driven by social incentives, comes at a lower cost, realizes economies of speed and enhances quality through diverse and greater participation. Despite these benefits, Bottom-up phenomena is perceived as a significant risk because the dynamic of control is uncertain. But every risk has its rewards and can be managed if known.
He goes on to relate examples where top-down control reaches down into the swarm of bottom up activities and creates a "middlespace" where merit and reward are provided from on high, but the logic of who gets the merit or rewards are determined by the swarm itself.
This is the emerging model of control: let the swarm control itself. Businesses that learn to operate in the middlespace will win, while those that continue to operate solely in a top-down fashion will lose.
Comments (1)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Business
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Suw equates the faddishness of social network offerings with the Rubik's Cube, which came and went once people got bored with twisting the object without getting anywhere. She goes on to suggest that aSmallworld, the oh-so-exclusive by-invitation-only social network operation, will fail because of a lack of focus, while solutions like Last.FM and Flikr will flourish, because they support a sort of virtual social intimacy. Knowing what someone is listening to, or peering at their world through their photo montage, brings us closer. Just having a gated community does not create closeness.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category:
Posted by Stowe Boyd
I know it looks like Evite is advertising in this piece, but they're not. I have created an evite to get a bunch of folks together for a cocktail party in Palo Alto next Friday (ping me if you want to be invited -- no trolls, please). While fiddling I noticed this new social slant in the ad: read reviews written by your friends.
This is another example of the ongoing trend where every online experience will be socialized by your network.
Of course the negative in this case is the incredibly bad user experience with importing contacts into Evite: no Outlook or instant messaging integration? Come on, get with it. The features related to keeping count of attendees, their comments, etc., are good, but I want to use my buddy list, thank you very much.
And shouldn't these guys be pioneering in the whole area of geolocation? The "ships passing in the night" service that I have wanted for years -- where friends can be informed when contacts happen to be in the same town or neighborhood (sort of like DodgeBall or Plazes) -- shouldn't Evite provide that as the context for having a get-together? Get real, guys.
Comments (1)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
Posted by Stowe Boyd
In some ways related to the discussion that Marc Eisenstadt and I have been pursuing the last few weeks about the ways to represent blog-to-blog dialog, I stumbled upon a really interesting thread at Functioning Form: a Tufte-inspired representation of an on-going narrative on a blog that spans many entries.
LukeW [from Functioning Form - Web-log Continuum Sparklines]
There are a number of ways to organize Web-log posts (entries):
- Date: time, month, day, year
- Popularity: number of comments, links, views
- Category: topic, theme
- Author: who wrote it, who commented on it, who linked to it
- Narrative sequence: evolution of an idea or story
Of these, the last option is probably the least common, yet potentially the most compelling for readers.
To address this, I introduced Web-log continuums last month that added a contextually relevant path for readers interested in how a particular idea has continued to evolve. But these links only tell half the story: they look forward and see if any posts dated after the current post reference it. To get the full story, I have taken a page from Edward Tuftes sparklines playbook.
Tufte defines sparklines as intense, design simple, word sized graphics that can gracefully and intensely narrate on-going results in detail. Though best suited for print (due to their intense resolutions), sparklines can also introduce a lot of contextual (and perhaps even actionable) information to Web blog posts.
 Here you see his representation of the blog continuum as a sparkline.
There are any number of ways that the display could be intrumented, and LukeW mentions a number of them. The spread between lines could represent the time dimension, weight could represent length of piece, etc.
I think the community dimension is potentially more interesting. How many readers of each entry could make the lines fatter, perhaps; or ratings (either explicit, or implicit: by link count) could be represented by a color dimension.
And finally the real-time presence aspect of the display: how many people are engaged in reading the various entries, right now? I have toyed with various swarming technologies in the past, where the number and even identities of individuals reading a post are displayed at the margin of the blog (a la Eyebees) and you are presented with the opportunity to join others in the swarm, and co-browse to the stories they are reading.
So, what I guess I want is a widget on the bottom of every story that has both flavors of time facets. On one hand, a slow-time chronology element that represents the linkage of the entry to others with various weights, distribution and colors denoting time sequence, popularity, and the like; while on the other hand, a real-time instantaneous representation of swarm involvement in the thread, like who's reading what, who's saying what (yes, of course I want chat integrated!), and how many are where at the present time.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
October 28, 2004
Posted by Gregory Narain
Everyone, except you real younguns, probably remembers buying music in some tangible format (vinyl, 8-track, cassette, or CD). A common practice, then and now, was for the best information to make it to the front, the A-Side. Other music, many times music that the musician, not the label, wanted, is placed on the flip side, B-Side.
Perhaps a common misconception of the B-Side is that it's "riddled with crap". Fortunately, I've heard many a B-Side that's good if not better than the A. Jimmie recently got me thinking about this as applies to blogging when he mentioned a photoblogger than was sorting his posts this way.
My first reaction to the notion was good, honestly. I really liked the idea that there was a place for overflow. It wasn't until last night, as we finished up some plans for the launch of a new blog (sorry can't tell more until next week), that I realized how much I could use one myself.
SocialTwister has never really been a personal blog. I see what I do here as part of work, but it's an enjoyable part (sometimes more than others). I tend to have a policy of posting only once a day. I do this to ensure that I give each post enough consideration and thought. My schedule is just too busy to write more often and I like to do my best once a day. Subsequent posts in the same day would be little quickies and against my goal.
Of course, there's nothing wrong with posting lots of times a day, it's in the DNA of bloggers. I get the urge many times to just throw stuff up, but I won't. I need a B-Side. If I had a B-Side, I would be able to be looser with my policy. I could post the meaty piece here and then lots of other things over there. Next week, I'll be starting that process.
I'm curious how you're all dealing with your content. Do you simply have different categories that you post to for filtering purposes (the pegboard approach)? Do you have on dumping category (the kitchen draw approach)? Do you have multiple blogs (the B-Side approach)? Do you just not say anything at all that's out of character?
If you've got a B-Side, can you provide links to both of your identities for some comparison?
Comments (2)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Media
Posted by Stowe Boyd
It looks like Marc has decided to take our dialog about "pay-for-ink" very personally (see Marc's Voice: On my own - HAH!), while I was really trying to keep to the ethical issue.
I don't think of myself as a namby-pamby academic type, sniffing the flowers and about to get trampled by the Wal-Marts (as Eric Rice suggests). Corante is actively working to promote more-or-less conventional advertising on our Industry Insider blogs, and we are also at work on several very innovative projects with sponsors (soon to be announced) where we are blending blogging and sponsorship in cool ways.
But I can't support "pay-for-ink" because I think it swings too far.
But I am not really trying to convince Marc, so much as stating what I think is the correct path to walk. Marc is (obviously) free to pursue whatever course he chooses to. And if I am reacting just like Marc knew I would, fine. I am not trying to conceal what I think, or create some convoluted argument. It doesn't bother me that my reaction is predicable; so I don't feel played.
In the final analysis, the market is Darwinian. If "pay-for-ink" works, people will gobble it up. But I doubt it.
Comments (1)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Marketing
Posted by Marc Eisenstadt
A recent piece in the New York Times Technology ('Circuits') section (free subscription required) describes some nifty activity being undertaken by Jules Urbach of Groove Alliance. The work, aside from providing a fast 3D-rendering engine for web-based media, promises to bring massively multiplayer gaming to the 'lightweight presence' world of Instant Messaging.
Mr. Urbach['s ...] invention, which he calls Otoy, is a game engine that piggybacks on instant messaging, and thus it is something of a Holy Grail in the software world. For years, developers have been trying to figure out ways to turn instant messaging into a multipronged medium that goes beyond mere chat to integrate games, e-mail and Web browsing; in the gloaming of a guest bedroom, Mr. Urbach believes he may well have come up with the skeleton key that will open IM to an era of hyper-functionality.
If it pans out as promised, this is going to be a very interesting development in the world of Synchronous Social Software. True, you can already bring fellow IM-ers into various games, but typically small games. True, you can already engage in IM-like activities in the big blockuster MMOGs (Massively Multiplayer Online Games.. sometimes better known as MMORPGs if you include the RP=Role Playing), epitomized by Everquest and Asheron's Call: these games involve hundreds of thousands of participants, but necessarily there are a much smaller number on your personal radar screen at any moment.
The cool thing about Otoy, at least from my perspective, is that it would allow simple 'massive crowd' games (think of a Mexican wave in a big stadium), which is the direction Yanna Vogiazou and I have been heading in, with early entrants like her BumperCars and CitiTag games. We'll be talking about how these games fit together with the BuddySpace instant messaging / geolocation framework at the forthcoming ACM Symposium on Applied Computing in a 'Ubiquitous Computing' track in March 2005, and as that progresses I'll be posting related developments here on Get Real. Readers interested in big-crowd presence and gaming, whether real, virtual or mixed-reality, may also be motivated to check out this List of Urban Mobile Games (from Howard Rheingold via several intermediate sources).
In the meantime we look forward to seeing how Otoy evolves.
Comments (3)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Art & Entertainment | Technology
Posted by Stowe Boyd
The flu vaccine shortage has brought to high relief the inability of our government to effectively respond to public health threats. This is the result of a laisser faire attititude toward the safety net that the government has an implicit obligation to put and keep in place for the old, young, and needy, but even more chilling, as the direct result of outdated ethics.
Confronted with a shortage of flu vaccine, the health care apparatchiks have responded in a 19th century, "women and children first" approach, which may feel like the ethical response, but is in fact not well-grounded scientifically. It turns out that doling out the scarce flu vacinations to those most at risk will not counter the threat of epidemic. The government bereaucrats may continue in the old, wrong-headed, and unscientific rhetoric, but the public heath people should know better.
Network science has shown that human interaction is scale free: that is to say, some of us have significantly more contacts that the rest of us. As scale-free networks grow, those with more contacts are more likely to add new contacts. This is the power law of popularity and influence that we have seen at work everywhere in human interactions.
Research into the spread of diseases like AIDS has suggested an alternative approach to breaking the non-linear expansion of the epidemic, which diffuses through the population just like innovations:
Albert-László Barabási [from Linked]
Despite differences in purpose and detail, all diffusion models predict the same phenomenon: Each innovations has a well-defined spreading rate, representing the likelihood that it will be adopted by a person introduced to it. [...] Yet knowing the spreading rate alone is not sufficient to decide the fate of an innovation. For what we must calculate is the critical threashold, a quantity determined by the properties of the network in which the innovation spreads. If the spreading rate of the innovation is less than the critical threshold, it will die out quickly. If it is over the threshold, however, than the number of people adopting it will increase expoentially until everybody who could use it does.
Recognizing that passing a critical threashold is the prerequisite for the spread of fads and viruses was probably the most important conceptual advance in understanding in spreading and diffusion. Currently the critical threshold is part of every diffusion theory. Epidemiologists work with it when they model the probablity that a new infection will turn into an epidemic, as the AIDS virus did. [...]
For decades, a simple but powerful paradigm dominated our treatment of diffusion problems. If we wanted to estimate the probability that an innovation would spread, we needed only to know its spreading rate and the critical threshold it faced. Recently, however, we learned that some viruses and innovations are oblivious to it.
Research into the spread of computer viruses has led to a new, network science-based approach to modeling -- and countering -- human epidemics.
Albert-László Barabási [from Linked]
The deadly virus [AIDS] must have followed the route already spotted in the spread of innovation and computer viruses: Hubs are among the first infected thanks to their numerous sexual contacts. Once infected, they quickly infect hundreds of others. If our sex web formed a homogeneous, random network, AIDS might have died out long ago. The scale-free topology of AIDS dispersal allowed the virus to spread and persist.
So the problem before us, ethically, should not be "find those who are the most at risk, and vaccinate them," but rather "who among us are most likely to be the hubs in the spread of the flu? Find them, and vaccinate them."
Especially when supplies are limited, the best hope to stem the rise of the epidemic is to find the most connected individuals in the population -- which in this case means physically connected, not virtually -- and immediately vaccinate them.
I am no expert in the determination of who are the most connected people, but it would likely include some obvious -- and non-obvious -- walks of life. Various kinds of public and health service workers come to mind: doctors, nurses, and other folks in hospitals, clinics, and medical offices who come in contact with the old, young, and infirm are obvious candidates. Starbucks barristas, taxi cab drivers, and bartenders -- while not at risk, necessarily, to succumbing to the flu -- are likely disease vectors who might spread the disease to hundreds of others if they were to contract it. I am even willing to concede that our Senators and Representatives to Congress are likely to fall into this group, and therefore administering vaccine to this group is in the public interest, even while it may appear to be self-serving.
While some have argued that adminstering AIDS counteragents (we still have no vaccine) to those who are most promiscuous only rewards unsavory and immoral behavior, we have no such quandary in this case. The flu is not a sexually transmitted disease, so there is no moral dimension to vaccinating the bus driver: he could infect hundreds of old, young, and infirm every day. And he would do so simply through doing his job, not through some arguably anti-social act. And worst of all, he could infect two dozen other bus drivers, who would infect thousands, again.
The scale-free network is there, we all know it, and you can't wish it away. Our best choice is to apply what we know.
The stupidity du jour is the bone-headed notion of vaccine lotteries. This is totally dumb, and intelligent people eveywhere should rise up against its apparent "fairness." It flies in the face of reason, and squanders perhaps our only chance to stop the spread of the flu in a population confronted with an inadequate supply of vaccine.
The outcome of better science should be the betterment of society, on the whole, and an improvement in every individual's life. However, this is only true if those that govern our collective resources wisely take into account the best scientific thought. If they, on the other hand, disregard science and devolve into outdated ethics and pseudo-scientific mumbo gumbo, they should be hounded from office.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category:
October 27, 2004
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Marc Canter's plan to create a little controversy around his "pay for ink" proposal has created a firestorm of contention, and my last post on the subject received pings from Marc, and J Luster, as well as a bunch of good comments by Zbigniew Lukasiak, TDavid, rick gregory, and Richard MacManus (Suw's wisecrack doesn't count).
The lines seem to be pretty clearly drawn, On one side, those that contend that "pay-for-ink" is bad, because it will pollute the trust and athenticity that bloggers live by. This camp includes Jason Calcanis, David Weinberger, J Luster, and me. On the other, Marc is pretty much on his own.
However, some interesting middle ground:
- Zbigniew points out that marketing departments do pay for survey information even when you check "this product blows" -- so in some aggregated way any ink might be considered good. But do companies actually want to pay someone to say that their product sucks?
- TDavid lists a number of services and sites that do blend content and product: "Epinions, WayPath, Lockergnome ... all sites that utiltize affiliate text links in and around content (and effectively, BTW). Calcanis's crusade is well-intentioned but misguided and comes off looking absurd considering the abundance of websites (and blogs too) that are already inserting advertising inside blog entries effectively for advertisers." But I think the difference here is that the ads are insinuated into the content automagically, and the authors are not being paid to make the comments. It happens the other way around: they make comments on something -- a Sony device -- and the content is then hyperlinked to some click through mechanism, and any micropayments are delivered to Epinions. This is not a blogger being paid to blog about the device
This is a debate that will never be over, because we all want to move beyond just selling real estate over there in the margin. But jumping all the way over to being a shill is too far to go, Marc.
Comments (3)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Marketing
October 25, 2004
Posted by Marc Eisenstadt
SUMMARY: Wall Street Journal "PDA newsfeed" via AvantGo terminated. Why?
DETAILS:
I tend to read a lot of news on my PDA (happens to be a fully-loaded iPaq 5550, about which I wrote an extended review and update). There are many reasons for this... most important of all being the anytime/anyplace functionality and just-big-enough form factor of the iPaq to make this a worthwhile (and generally quite informative) end-user experience. Because I'm always synched with my emails, I get any RSS blogfeeds automatically via NewsGator, which is synched with my email Inbox and therefore with my PDA. At the same time, I always run AvantGo's ActiveSync module, so I also get a number of 'channels', i.e. news-feeds available via the AvantGo's free service.
Importantly for me as an avid news-hound, the different services tend to provide very different subjective experiences. Whenever possible, I like reading selected bloggers and news sources in their 'native habitats', i.e. the web browsing experience for which many of them are designed -- this is especially beneficial when multimedia snippets are included. In case of 'cognitive overload' (i.e. normal life), then quick perusal of many stories via a news aggregator is extremely valuable.
AvantGo differs from typical (automated) RSS feeds in that it is a 'clipping service', which offers a 'sensibly-rendered' variant of news feeds that look quite nice on a PDA, and contain all the important content. Not as rich as the full web experience, but not as impoverished as many RSS feeds. With this in mind, I was somewhat startled when browsing my AvantGo pages on my PDA late last night to see the following alert on my (rarely-accessed but sometimes-valuable) Wall Street Journal 'channel':
We are sorry to inform you that effective October 31, 2004, The Wall Street Journal Online's channel on AvantGo will no longer be available.
We appreciate your interest in our services, and would like to offer you a special subscription rate to the Online Journal's website, at WSJ.com. We'd also like to keep you informed of new mobile services we'll be offering in the near future.
Very interesting! Many AvantGo services are 'trailers' for a larger subscription service, so it may be that this trailer was simply not yielding enough click-throughs. In the past, I have noted blog entries such as this one asking
Anyone have any idea why AvantGo does not support RSS, RDF, and Atom feeds? Maybe the various aggregors have made AvantGo obsolete? I guess I can utilize NewsMob for now (no opml import support).
This is a very interesting question. My personal desire for a 'better subjective experience' via AvantGo-style clipping services may not accord with the financial realities of maintaining such a service, and the world of RSS feeds is rapidly growing, and providing very well-informed and viable competition!
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Marc continues the dialog regarding his modest proposal to make "100s of millions for bloggers" by creating a "pay for ink" business.
At first he is dismissive of the arguments that I made (as well as others) regarding "crossing the line" between observing what is happening in some market and, alternatively, explicitly blogging on products because you are paid to do so.
As I understand Marc's contention, he (or some company he is thinking about setting up) will stand in between the individual blogger and the sponsors, and he will distribute the funds based on product mention, but with no specific effort to create positive spin. So the blogger will just collect his micro payments for micro mentions, and there is no foul. And in this way, the blogger stays pure.
Marc Canter [from Marc's Voice: REbutt, enlighten and grimace]
The purity of bloggers is what we want. AND the honesty. The moment our bloggers start shilling us - is the moment the whole thing is ruined.
WHAT IF this works - that's what the MOST terrifying. WHAT IF folks could REALLY say what they want and STILL get paid?
- we will not, I repeat, we will NOT be censoring, limiting or telling our bloggers what to blog. No one believes me on this point. They just can't seem to fathom the notion of someone paying to be lambasted - but gee, maybe it's true.
- why is everyone so upset? Perhaps because I'm challenging this hi-falooted notion of blogging. Perhaps becuase I don't buy that blogging and bloggers are the saviors of modern day democracy, journalism and media? Perhaps blogging is just a viral web based phenomena - that's found a home in lonely, information thristy customers who dig the honesty and difference from what they're used to? Why the brain pondering introspective nuances and conversations? What's wrong with having fun, making a buck and getting on with it?
As I sat across the table from David Weinberger he said that this idea would pollute the purity of blogging - that's all I needed to hear.
Right on!
Let's pollute the hell out of it.
I am not so concerned about the purity of blogging -- I am eager to sell advertising at Corante blogs -- but I don't like the idea of selling space in sentences, just over in the margins.
I agree with Marc's contention that the current model of blog advertsing means that only those with real influence can make money -- influence either from large readership or very select readership. But I think that is how the world works: its not just a convention around blogs.
We can experiment with all sorts of interesting sponsorships -- I will be announcing something along those lines later this week, in fact -- where sponsors dollars do something more interesting than buy a rectangle of real estate on a blog page. But there still needs to be a hands-off policy regarding the words coming out of our mouths. And while make seems to be saying "You are free to say whatever you want," I think I hear him saying, "but if you want this check, please talk about 'product X'."
We have sponsored blog entries here at Corante (although they are not running in this new template, at the moment) so maybe that's all that's needed. But in such a case we explicitly mark the sponsored entries as such. We even were making them a different color, so they would stand out (again, currently disabled -- soon to be back).
So the the skinny on this is: I don't think that there will be enough in it for advertisers to pay, the results will be meager, and potential for loss of credibility for bloggers will be too high.
Comments (5)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Marketing
October 22, 2004
Posted by Stowe Boyd
A reminder that on Tuesday, 26 Oct, 9am PT, I will be presenting a webinar called "Instant Messaging and the Attention Economy" courtesy of the nice folks at Microsoft (click here for more info and registration).
It going to be an hour, with me blabbing for 30 mins, 15 mins of dialog with the host, William Flash, and then 15 mins of Q&A.
I hear that like 100+ folks have signed up.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Events
Posted by Stowe Boyd
So no sooner than I set up the eBay store to sell Corante ads (which I thought was a cool idea), I get my personal eBay account suspended for being a shill, and eBay takes all the inventory out of the store -- which took me hours to set up and populate.
What happened is an obvious transition issue. I was setting up the store on one hand, and starting to put inventory in it, when a couple of big advertisin sales came through -- ones that had been conducted in the old fashioned "via email" form of sales.
So, I looked in the store management controls and there is no way to retire inventory as being sold but not through eBay. You can end the sale, but it goes into the database as unsold.
So I bought all the weeks of ads that had been purchased by my clients via my eBay account. What I should have done, in retrospect, was to ask my advertisers to log on and do it, but it was Saturday, and I wanted to straighten the store up so I could announce it on Monday.
Also, these ads were all listed at a fixed price, not as an auction, so I wasn't in some way bidding up the price.
It also turns out that eBay used to allow store owners to do what I did, in the past, but it was a abused, and they changed their policies.
The thing that is most annoying is getting a series of emails within a two hour period: the first warning me about "shill" practices, and suggesting I read the policies and refrain from such activities -- all this stuff took place last weekend, note -- and then immediately followed by a suspending of my account, and then the pulling of all my remaining inventory from my store.
And now, since there is basically no way to call eBay on the phone, I have to wait a few days to get a response to the emails I have sent along.
Ugh.
Comments (1)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category:
October 21, 2004
Posted by Stowe Boyd
I had a web conference with Brian Donahoo of Citrix Online yesterday, and he outlined the reasons that GoToMeeting has become the fastest growing product that the company has offered, eclipsing the monumentally sucessful GoToMyPC, and the lesser known but very widely adopted GoToAssist. The story within the story is not the technology itself, per se -- although what has been developed is impressive, and I will discuss certain functionality later on.
The inner story is in a way, commonsensical. I asked the obvious question: "Why did you choose to enter a crowded marketplace, with a bunch of well-entrenched competitors, and the imminent possibiltiy of a market consolidation around offerings like LiveMeeting and WebEx?" The answer: Citrix went out and surveyed existing, former, and potential users of online conferencing solutions and discover several very critical and unmet needs:
- The solutions availble were generally not easy to use by attendees.
- The solutions were considered by many to be expensive, relative to actual use; and worse, the expense is highly variable, with all sorts of additional charges that occur based on exceedingly difficult-to-track limits.
- While many large companies have adopted web conferencing, mid size and small companies have not.
- The solutions available were not oriented toward ad hoc use, but more so toward programmed and scheduled conferences.
So Citrix determined to develop a technology to meet these needs, and to satisfy the large and growing Mid size and SoHo market niches. Based on the technologies that underlie GoToMyPC and GoToAssist, they were able to develop GoToMeeting in a very short time, and to leverage their deep expertise in high performance hosted solutions.
The fee structure: a flat rate of $39/mo for 1 organizer to be able to have an unlimited number of unlimited duration meetings that can have up to 10 attendees. Or for those that need larger meetings, or need to have more than a single organizer, there is a Corporate version of the solution.
They have integrated a free conference calling service, where yout attendees are charged for the call, although with the Corporate version, you can arrange for an alternate telephone service where attendees will not be charged.

I found the tool almost effortless to use. A small client (above) runs on your desktop, something like an IM client, and you can simply invite people to join your "meeting" -- which is basically your shared desktop. When collapsed there is just a tiny panel that looks something like a minimized media player (below).

Once a session is open, you can then run any program, like Powerpoint, and display your screen. You can switch presenters, and the other person can display his screen, or alternately you can cede control of your keyboard/mouse to the other person, and they can control your app.
Invitations are either by email, or through a copy/paste technique you can IM folks to join. Brian showed me a plugin for Outlook, which makes invitations easier.
Very slick, very minimal and flexible. I like it.
Obviously, I still want more, like integrated video, audio, and recording/playback, as well as a more sophisticated integration with IM clients along the lines of what they have contrived for Outlook. But what they have is more than enough for what I want to do, and because of the "switch presenters" mechanism, I will now be able to ask people who want to give me demos (and I get like four or five per week) to use my solution, instead of having to download all sorts of strange, slow, and fragile clients. I was getting a demo a few weeks ago, and the client had to try two different services before finally emailing me a presentation and having me click through as he announced "next."
Comments (2)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Marc Canter seems to be suggesting a new business scheme (or model, if you'd like) based around pay-for-press: Marc Canter [from Marc's Voice: Transparency and sponsorship in the blogosphere]
One thing we DON'T want to do is hide the fact or pretend like it's anything other than income for bloggers. The particular product we're going to 'flog' is not something a blogger would use for blogging or even use at all. But it's coolio and has something to offer the world that's unqiue. And that's worth talking about.
The fact that we found them and give them money - just means that THIS particular meme gets spread (as opposed to any other one) and I believe that's called marketing.
There's lots of money available for marketing, some of it going to advertising. But wouldn't it be coolio if some of it went directly into blogger's pockets? I like the feel of it it my pocket!
We designed this program to tap into the pure state of what (as I see it) a blogger is - somebody who, off on their own, has something to say.
If through paying this blogger to blog about a particular product, the company can have it's agenda achieved - then why not?
Well, there are a lot of reasons why not. This takes the blogger out of being a commentator or analyst, and makes them a spokesperson or endorser.
Of course, if you really love blue Jello, there is nothing wrong with saying so; and there is nothing wrong with the makers of Jello buying an ad on your site since you write a lot about food. But there is something wrong with writing about Jello (at least in an completely false way) if in fact you hate it, but the marketers want the readers of your blog to get a different message.
There is a thin line between propaganda and marketing-facing editorializing, and we shouldn't cross it or we will lose authenticity and trust.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Marketing
Posted by Stowe Boyd
I noted that Mark was talking about the recent splash of some big users of Hitmaps, so I glanced at the HitMaps users table, and discovered that Get Real has accumulated 10,084 visitors in the period 10/7-10/20. Wow! Just under 1,000/day.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
Posted by Stowe Boyd
danah and others at Many-to Many are wrestling with the pros and cons of the term "Social Software", largely as the outgrowth of a recent piece by Chris Allen.
I coined the term "social tools" in 1999, to express the disconnection that I saw with products like Abuzz Beehive, and the intent is exactly that of Drexler's introduction of the term social software (resuscitated in 2002 by Clay Shirky).
Stowe Boyd [from Message - Business Culture in the Post-Everything Economy]
The Rise of Social Tools
The big story of the transformation of business culture isnt the props -- the servers, networks, ten million web sites, and all the information lying around in databases and in HTML -- but what people are saying to each other and how they coordinate their actions, behavior, and goals. The big story is that the global computer network is a enormous chat room, enabling us to collaborate in unexpected, complex, and novel ways. We are experimenting with new social systems, systems that to an unprecedented degree involve software and hardware.
In the 60s it had become unthinkable to run a business without a telephone on every desk. By the late 80s, everyone had to have email. The need for cost justification of these new expenses, at first demanded by management, fell by the wayside as the second-order effects -- the social impacts -- became felt. The rise of PCs has not led to increase in productivity relative to things that people formerly did without PCs, like writing letters and memos, or selling widgets. PCs have decreased productivity in these areas. Why? Because people are spending their time in new activities, activities that were not possible before, and adding new value to the business. And all that comes for a price -- the time spent in the care and feeding of computers, networks, and software.
And at the same time, a new category of software is emerging, software intended to augment social systems. Not to change the company inadvertently, like email did, when the electronic analog of interoffice mail became something else, grew into something else by changing the way people communicated, and led a change in the structure of the company. No, this generation of software is intentional, designed from the start to guide human behaviour into new paths and patterns, to counter prevailing ways of interaction. I call these social tools: software intended to shape business culture.
I focused on the tools side, the technology side, because of the quote of Kenneth Bouldin -- "We make our tools, and they shape us" -- and because of my experience as a tool builder. It is the cutting edge of these tools that matters, not that they are software first and hardware second. What makes up the tools is not the point, but how we are shaped after using them.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
October 20, 2004
Posted by Stowe Boyd
I saw a citation at Mathemagenic:
Voida, A., Mynatt, E.D., Erickson, T., & Kellogg, W.A. (2004). Interviewing over instant messaging. In extended abstracts of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2004). Vienna, Austria, April 24-29. New York: ACM Press, pp. 1344-1347. (If you don't have full-text access to ACM, you can get .pdf here or here)
Abstract. Interviews are a cornerstone of human-computer interaction research. As a research method, they can both be deeply valuable and distinctly challenging. Pragmatic challenges of interviews include the travel that may be required to meet face-to-face with a respondent or the time necessary to transcribe the exchange. As a tool for conducting interviews, instant messaging presents some compelling potential benefits to mitigate challenges such as these. And yet, over the medium of instant messaging, the genre of the interview takes on a different character. Drawing from our experiences conducting interviews over instant messaging, we reflect on the implications of using this new medium for conducting interviews.
I don't have ACM access, so I can't get the piece but I got the piece, and even though Lilia was "too lazy to summarize"; although she goes on to ask for advice about IM interviews:"I'm really thinking of doing IM interviews for my PhD research. Any experiences I should take into account?"
The report focuses on lot on the differences in attitude about multitasking during IM interviews, which is normally considered normal, but not so in this context. Their concluding points: [...] the character of the interview genre changed in sometimes significant ways when carried out over the instant messaging medium. We have reflected on our own experiences interviewing over instant messaging, exploring the ways in which expectations about attention, timing, limited context, and persistence impact the genre of the interview. We will continue to experiment with the use of instant messaging for conducting interviews. Based on our experiences and observations, we intend to try some of the following strategies:
- asking respondents if they would be willing to share their prior thoughts or thought processes in the event that they type for several minutes and only send a short message;
- summarizing our understanding of what the respondents have said prior to asking follow-up questions in situations where probing for nuance
- being mindful of the pacing of the interview and the length of pre-written questions when cutting and pasting them into the interview; and
- taking advantage of instant messagings persistence by explicitly suggesting that respondents scroll back and consider whether there was anything we had not discussed that they would like to add to the conversation.
By reflecting on our experiences interviewing over instant messaging and observing some interesting interactions between medium and genre, we hope to provide a variety of things to think about for those considering or planning to conduct interviews over instant messaging.
I have done a few, and the results have been pretty good. I like the Gush technology for presenting the history of a chat as a flash object, but that's just gloss. The core issues are just like any other interview: start with a short list of topics in mind, and get in there.
You have to be careful about stepping on each other, since the visual and verbal cues are absent. I generally avoid the issues around multitasking by only working the interview. And what the researchers don't say is that the interviewees can't complain later that you are putting words in their mouths -- it is their typing that you are capturing, after all.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
Posted by Stowe Boyd
UpSNAP has announced a cool service, using mobile text messaging to provide a 411 service:
[via email]
Just a quick one to give you the heads up on today's news - the availability of a new FREE 411 service for mobile users via text-messaging from UpSNAP. Until now, every time a mobile phone user had to make a 411 call, they had to pay $1.30 or more per look-up fee by their wireless carrier. Starting today, they can sign up for the free service by visiting www.upsnap.com or by sending a text message to: 604 877 SNAP (7627). That's it- It's easy to use and requires no registration or installation of any kind. The service is entirely free- The only thing consumers will have to pay for is text messaging charges (by their carrier.)
This is how it works: a consumer would simply type in the name and location of the listing they want - by city, zip code, area code or airport code and in less than 10 seconds the number is sent directly to their phone through a text message reply.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
Posted by Stowe Boyd
The long-rumored Microsoft "Istanbul" has been leaked to the press:
the Associated Press
[from Microsoft to Debut 'Istanbul' Application]
BOSTON (AP) -- Microsoft Corp. introduced on Tuesday a desktop computer application that aims to seamlessly integrate e-mail, instant messaging, video conferencing, traditional phone service and Internet-based calling.
Microsoft plans to debut the product, code-named "Istanbul," sometime in the first half of 2005. It will compete with efforts from rivals including IBM Corp. and smaller players such as Convoq Inc. to link together various channels of communications and promote their most effective use.
The products employ "presence" technology, which tells users whether co-workers are online and their degree of availability -- whether they can take a phone call or prefer to be e-mailed or to instead join a Web conference, for example.
The idea is to enhance the "buddy list" concept of instant messaging so workers can choose how to best communicate in a given moment, bringing an end to games of phone tag in a world of packed schedules.
Dear God, I hope we can stop putting terms like presence and buddy list in scare quotes at some point.
For those who have been talking to the folks at Microsoft, this is no surprise, as I said here recently, although a lot of so-called Microsoft watchers were still in the dark last week.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology | Telecommunications
Posted by Stowe Boyd
I got a press release recently touting the fact that Vonage is selling through the Buy.com marketplace: [via email]
VONAGE® TO SELL ITS SERVICE ON BUY.COM® THE INTERNET SUPERSTORE
Offering its Service on One of the Nation's Leading Electronics E-Commerce Retailers Gives Consumers More Options When Seeking a Flat-Rate Calling Plan
Edison, N.J. & Aliso Viejo, C.A., October 19, 2004 - Vonage Holdings Corp., the leading broadband phone company, today announced Buy.com, the Internet Superstore will sell its services on its Website, www.buy.com. Vonage is pleased to offer its industry transforming calling plans on the nation's leading electronics E-commerce site.
Got me to thinking about interesting ways to package and sell Corante's inventory of ad space, as opposed to doing it the old fashioned way (sales guys calling folks up on the phone and pitching) -- or even the supposedly new way, like GoogleAds or BlogAds.
So I created an eBay Store over the weekend: stores.ebay.com/corante. And I posted the available stock of ads for Get Real and Strange Attractor, two blogs that have had some biggish ad sales recently. For example, starting Nov 1, both Get Real and Strange Attractor have their Premier Ads sold though May, and Get Real's Lead Ad A is sold through the end of February. In the upcoming weeks, we will be adding other blogs' ad stock to the store's inventory, as well as cross-blog sponsorship options.
The options that eBay offers to its sellers are a bit restrictive for what I am trying to do. In the perfect world, I would like to have an ongoing auction starting as soon as I post an ad slot at the store, and completing say two weeks before the ad is going to run, with a "buy it now" price. But eBay auctions are not very configurable: you can't have an auction that runs until a specified date. And even a 10 day auction costs more than the default seven day auction. So I have defaulted to setting a fixed price on each sort of ad.
Comments (1)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Marketing
October 19, 2004
Posted by Stowe Boyd
I took the plunge and signed up last week for Basecamp, a blog-based project management solution. We have so much going on at Corante (and a mess of announcements in the works) that I was starting to lose myself in the details.
The results have been really good. I quickly configured the service with Corante logo, etc., set up a dozen projects in a few hours, and invited about a dozen collaborators in various projects.
Basecamp is a great example of what specialized, blog-based tools can do for project coordination.
Here's a screenshot of the "Dashboard" view, which provides each user with a summary of information for all their projects.

The folks at Edgecamp enumerate 6 points on this screenshot
- Your logo appears in the upper-left.
- Late milestones are called out and linked.
- Any milestones due in the next 14 days are plotted and linked on a calendar, starting with today's date. If there are no milestones in the next 14 days, the next 3 milestones are listed.
- Projects that have new posts or comments since your last visit are labeled "UPDATED".
- Projects that haven't had a new post or comment in 30 days are automatically moved to the Inactive Projects section.
- The "What's fresh" log shows the last 25 posts, comments, completed milestones, and completed to-dos across all of your projects. Clicking one of the categories (eg. "Milestones") filters the list.
- [not numbered on the screenshot] Track all projects in your favorite aggregator with the "What's fresh" RSS feed.
I really like the RSS feed; I have tried to turn off email notifications in general, as a result.
The blog, or "Messages" display, is a more or less no frills blog model, with comments and file attachments associated with the blog.

The file attachments caused me some hassles, and represents really the only complaint I have about the service as implemented. I had to configure a folder on the www.corante.com server for FTP access, and then configure a bunch of FTP settings within Basecamp, to get attachments to work. Seems that Basecamp is unwilling to allocate the storage needed, and provide backup, for file management. Not even for an additional fee. But the file attachments do work as advertised, once everything was set up.
The basic model is blog postings, along with the creation of milestones and to do lists. To-dos can be linked to specific milestones, and milestones can be linked to blog entries. As a result, the notifications serve as a constant reminder of what's coming in the near term.
The milestone display is limited to the next 14 day period, which is nice as a default, but I would like to enlarge to the coming month, two months, whatever, on demand.
The projects are of two types -- Internal, where only employees or contractors can see what's being said, or Customer focused, where your clients can participate. Pretty cool. And you can even tag some items in Customer projects as private, like a private to-do list, or blog posting, that your client can't see, but your team can.
The other missing pieces:
- Integration with Outlook -- they provide iCalendar support, but I would like to be able export or sync milestones and to-dos with Outlook.
- Calendar view of the whole thing -- blog entries, to-dos, comments, file postings, etc.
- Integration with IM -- they nicely allow you to enter a single (grrrr) IM handle, but they should also allow alerting through IM. If they talked to the nice Carr brothers over at 2Entwine, they could ping people on every service (if desired) whenever there is new content in general, or on specific projects. I don't always have my RSS feeds open, but I am always in IM.
- Email posting -- would be sensible to support an email posting (as much as I personally hate it), with a private email address associated with each project, including attached files.
- Controllable "dashboards" -- I would like to be able to define arbitrary aggregation of project related content, and define them as dashboards. For example, I would like to aggregate project information from various projects into a single dashboard, using categories, and filtering out all private information, and serving that information up to some defined list of participants. As an example, imagine pulling information from all Corante Research Projects that are tagged as "Public" and serving it up to all our Advisory Research clients, no matter what Advisory Service they have signed up for.
- Nested projects -- need subprojects. For example, I would like to coordinate with each client within the Social Tools Advisory Service individually, at a subproject level, but by the same token, I would like to have all members of the service to have access to some common information.
- Trackbacks -- obviously.
I am very pleased with what I have seen, and look forward to increased functionality in the future. But Basecamp seems to offer that critical mass of features that meets the 80/20 rule: 80% of everything you want to do can be satisfied by 20% of all imaginable functionality.
Comments (2)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
October 18, 2004
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Carl suggests that the Sametime client is looking a bit old:
Carl Tyler [from Sametime plugin for Trillian]
This is very good for Trillian users (like me) but I would have liked to have seen an updated sametime connect client from IBM before they put effort into this...The connect client is starting to look very long in the tooth. Not long and the new IM client (Istanbul) from Microsoft will ship, and then Sametime will look even more dated...
I recently (a few weeks ago) chatted with Ed Brill about this very fact -- the years that Lotus let pass without really getting up to speed with what others are doing with rich clients, like Trillian and Gush. Ed suggested that while this was true, IBM/Lotus was committed to bettering the situation. We'll see.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
Posted by Stowe Boyd
I see that TechWeb is offering $500 of free Starbucks coffee (and I am an addict, I admit) for the ten best (or at least most popular) tech blogs. Voting starts Nov1. Please nominate Get Real. I need that coffee!
You can nominate 4 other blogs, as well.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category:
Posted by Stowe Boyd
AIM is trying to capitalize on the preference of younger people to use IM rather than email or telephone. They are offering "artistically" designed Buddy Cards, which you can print and hand out to your contacts.

Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
October 14, 2004
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Highlights from the Jabber on Wall Street event today:
Navin Rajapakse, Vice President, Global Architecture and Engineering, Lehman Brothers Lehman made the decision to adopt Jabber two years ago. We had Mindalign (Parlano), as well as several homegrown IM solutions. We had various non-communicating islands of IM.
We also wanted to be able to communicate remotely, with people working outside the building. So they opened up to AOL and Yahoo. Soon, we grew concerned about that, and wanted more control, but still needed to talk with the public networks.
The requirements led to a bake off between IBM/Lotus Sametime and Jabber. The customization of Jabber's client was significantly easier. On the server side, we evaluated the flexibility of Jabber, and adopted various open source modules.
And in the final analysis, the Jabber solution was more cost effective.
TIBCO is the company's enterprise application integration framework, and Jabber seemed relatively easy to integrate there.
We had a need to develop self-service 'bots, and Jabber offered an easy way to do that.
And we had to meet various SEC requirements on privacy, security, and auditability.
[presents tiered architecture: notes that today, Lehman is not taking advantage of server-to-server capability]
We have integrated a generalized notion of presence that can be included into other applications, and we have presence enabled our directory.
Used an early version of the Jabber web client, but the Win32 client was more critical to Lehman's use.
While the 1:1 chat was solid, there were various features needed for roll-out of group chat, which Jabber rolled out in a few months time.
Now, in use at 80%-90% of the company.
We have SEC compliant escrowing and retrieval of all IM messages as needed.
We have eliminated other IM solutions, and have integrated 20 or 30 applications taht are using Jabber as an alert mechanism.
We have integrated with LehmanLive, directory, security and reporting services.
2,000-9,500 concurrent users. All over the globe, and even during the weekend, so we need to be up 24X7.
3-3.5 M messages per week, which includes IM and chat.
Launched early part of last year: it is considered a tier 1, mission critical application, like email.
Different groups have different modes. Like the equities guys who use a chat room to swap deal information.
On the equities side, we have set up chat rooms, like foreign exchange.
We have extended the client and chat in several ways. For example, we integrated voice, so you can right click on a buddy, and it will dial.
We decided to pick a protocol, XMPP, and go with it, even though the market has not settled that protocol war.
Issues with compliance with AOL and various consortium based IM clients were problematic. We decided to go with an 80/20 rule, and use Jabber, and let the other issues fall to the side for now.
Most important, we ensured SEC compliance.
Question: How much monthly maintenance? Have you considered a hosted solution?
A: We don't have a dedicated team, we have an operations staff that handle it. Its nearly a zero maintenance, except for upgrades.
Question: How builds the applications that integrate with Jabber?
A: We built a TIBCO bridge, so our application developers are experienced in building to that.
Question: How do make sure the apps don't crush the Jabber system?
A: We have a Karma system that tracks message rates, and quickly resolve any issues.
Jeremy Condie, SVP, Thomson Financial Whay are we here, at a conference about Jabber?
I am a senior VP for Thomson Financial, and I am architect for our collaboration and communication systems.
What is Thomson Financial? We are one of the three largest financial information services, we are the largest provider of information to banks, for eample. We are better known for our brands, which are now being united into a single framework: Thomson ONE.
Collaboration is central to our business. We are moving beyond providing information. If you are a banker, a trader, an analyste, we are going to help you collaborate better.
Our strategy is based on helping our clients to gain mindshare, so that they will get the phone call at 2am from a customer.
We are focused on inproving user's workflow, and of course, that means we have to integrate with what they have on their desktop.
We are not building a proprietary IM system, we are incorporating a successful and proven instant messaging infrastructure from an innovator. That means we are leveraging ROI, minimize user disruption, and rapidly get productivity for our clients.
Being informed is not enough; until you impart that content to a client, it doesn't benefit you. How can you make sure that you are up with the moment on ionformation that is critical for clients. Is that already priced into the market?
Thomson has bought nearly every information company out there. We have an infinite degree of content. When we created Thomson ONE, we didn't make a single solution. You can configure your desktop with what you want, and all the components plug-and-play, and communicate with each other. We have integrated Jabber int he same way.
For example, if I am tracking some datum about Qualcomm, I could bring up various research and real time feeds about Qualcomm. So I can know before my client asks. And you can confirm in real time using Jabber.
Where's the edge in financial services? You need to gain an edge through a deeper insight rather than faster typing speed.
What about extending the IM environment to your customers? You can filter the information as needed, but you could present an IM window on the client's desktop where you could be sharing certain information. Whether its a banker, or an analyst, or a bond trader.
This is pushing the boundaries a bit, but this is where we see it heading.
David Fowler, VP Marketing and Alliances, IMlogic No one uses email without spam filters; the same sort of management has to be applied to IM.
Companies have to get past the denial stage of IM; you can't seriously contemplate turning it off. A recent study showed that bond traders that use IM make 500K more per year than those that don't.
Today, use of public IM is still the majority in the market. But we see a trend in the market toward enterprise solutions, like Jabber. But we will see them running side by side for a long time to come.
First problem when we go into an organization, they don't don't really know what's going on. They don't which IM systems are used, who is doing file transfers, and what identities are being used.
Second, IM tools tunnel through your firewall, and there are a number of security problems: viruses, for example.
Third, there are legal risks. A large amount of sexual content is streaming aorund; and just the institution of archiving will curtail that, as well as keeping track of commitments in deals, for example.
Last, we need to avoid IT headaches -- like integrating with LDAP.
How do we manage IM? We act as the proxy, running side by side with your enterprise IM system, and control the interface with the public networks. We can map identities, and control the various features: if you want to disallow file transfers, for example, we can do that.
And obviously, we support compliance: archival, retention, discovery, supervisory, surveillance, and entitlement requirements.
How does this all fit together? It is likely that you are using a public IM system today, and considering moving to an enterprise IM system, like Jabber. We recommend that you take a long look at Jabber, and think about putting
Q: How do you integrae with existing archive solutions?
A: We have relationships with Legato, KBS, and other archive solutions.
Q: Is there a certain size company that would best fit this solution?
A: We have groups as small as 10, and up to thousands. Small comapnies sometime try to sneak by, but the cost is so small it is not worth the risk.
Paul Guerin, SVP Sales and Marketing, Jabber We see the financial services industry as a hotbed of collaboration and communication. We see the power of presence as the keystone of the next generation of applications, and the business processes that are core to the industry.
I want to thank you all for coming, and we hope you will come to other events in this seminar series, as well as our webinar series.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Events | guest
Posted by Stowe Boyd
I am blogging from Jabber on Wall Street event, and Joe Hildebrand, Jabber's Chief Architect presented a brief overview of the technology that underlies Jabber XCP.
His comments:
Jabber XCP is a secure stable technology that can enable sophisticated real-time applications.
New in Jabber XCP 4.0:
- New federation features: encryption, selective federation
- even more scalability and avilability
- information broker
- SDKs -- taking the existing APIs and extending into full-up SDKs to allow others to more easily develop real-time enabled applications
New in Jabber Messenger 3.0:
- new look and feel
- fully skinnable and brandable
Coming Soon:
SIMPLE gateway -- won't have to make a choice on protocol; will integrate with Lotus IM first; Microsoft LCS when it ships
- external command interface -- custom forms applications; webex integration; other collaboration to follow
Jabber XCP on Wall Street Tormorrow
Use content feeds -- internal feeds and from service providers
Build Real-time applications -- integrate with desktop applications;forms based integration
Question: Who is your biggest customerand what is the largest number of concurrent users?
A: France Telecom is largest; HP is customer and Jabber is on every desktop there.
[Note: I think that Joe's vision of forms-based Jabber enabled applications that serve the business process automation of the business of tomorrow is dead on.]
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Events | guest
October 13, 2004
Posted by Marc Eisenstadt
This one looks very cool indeed... well, I've obviously gotta put this guy directly in touch with HitMaps man Jiri Komzak...which in fact is exactly what I'm doing!
AkuAku.org
[from J2ME BLUETOOTH GPS MO-PHO-WEBLOGGING]
 I've created a system that allows a Nokia camphone to take a photo, attach GPS coordinates obtained from a bluetooth GPS device, and post it to a weblog along with an interactive map showing the location. I wrote it in J2ME, but I plan on rewriting it in C++.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category:
October 12, 2004
Posted by Gregory Narain
I started a thread on SocialTwister that's gotten some good feedback and commentary. I thought it appropriate to share it here as well.
SocialTwister.com
[from "The Coming of the Database Economy - Hold Onto Your Opinions"]
In the future, the question will largely shift from "Should I archive this information" to "Should I query this information". When everything is moved to the point that it is searchable, getting "new" information from a system is more a function of programming than brute force. Whoever has the biggest, fastest algorithm wins.
So where's the long-term value then? Fortunately for us, these things always repeat themselves. As one force fades to the background a new one emerges. In my eyes, that new force is opinion, which I'd wrap in a Reputation bow. When there are millions upon millions of points of data to consider, knowing which the best is becomes far more important.
Consider that for a moment. What drives the value of Amazon, for example? In the beginning, it was simply enough to have the database of books since no one else had it. What pushes me back to Amazon, more often than not, however, is not the database (I assume everyone has it now). I am drawn in by things like the User Reviews and Ratings, not to mention, the Recommended Reading lists and other hooks like that. Given too many choices, I often find myself polling constantly for external benchmarks to evaluate with. Despite the best efforts of the AI community, I still have little faith that I would outsource my opinions to a server farm or that I would trust the wisdom of a crowd of robots in personal matters.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Ted Rheingold [of Dogster and Catster] [via email]
So as you may know I added a Diary feature to Dogster and Catster and they've been quickly adopted (over 2,250 so far), so I made a clearing house page for them. Can blogrolls, feeds and trackbacks be far behind? Why not I say.
http://www.catster.com/diary/dcentral.php
http://www.dogster.com/diary/dcentral.php
Watching what people write about is both a bit mundane content-wise but culturally fascinating. They communicate in a similar manner when they message each other, almost exclusviely using their pet as avatar, Using a persona to communicate online is ancient, but here I find it to be much more intimate without getting personal. It's a much more trusted, safe, environment to let your avatars spirit run wild, rather like the original user groups of yore
Just had to share. I go a bit crazy just talking to dogs all day ;>
Much woof,
T
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Media
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Microsoft has everyone stymied regarding its plans for VOiP:
Ellen Muraskin [from Microsoft's Looming VON Announcement: Not VOIP?
I'm damned if I can figure out what Microsoft Corp. is going to announce with the first, most prominent keynote of all at this month's Voice on the Net [VON] show, if not telephony links to its LCS (Live Communications Server). The keynoter is Anoop Gupta, corporate vice president of Microsoft's real-time collaboration business unit -- the one charged with LCS.
The "tattler" leaks reported by Mary Jo Foley support my hunch, even as she gets an official denial from Redmond. Maybe there's some technicality here we're missing?
I am betraying no confidences by stating the obvious: Microsoft has always asserted the key role of telephony integrated into its collaboration strategy of LCS. Read the briefs that I wrote last year, based on interviews and meetings with Gurdeep Pal ( First Take: Live Communications Server, and Real-Time Revolution)
[from Real-Time Revolution]
G[urdeep Singh Pal]: Yes. That's why CTI (Computer Telephony Integration) crashed and burned. Even at Microsoft, we tried like 23 goes at CTI, but they failed because they didn't integrate with what was already there. They used a separate address book, they had no idea of presence: it was a totally different user experience. But imagine instead the example we had before, where the pawn associated with the paragraph's author could also allow you to right-click and dial -- I would be able to get them, without even having to know what phone they were using, or the number. Again: applying the same user experience makes it easy.
S[towe Boyd]: You are starting to dig into another theme I wanted to ask about: the increasingly clever devices that folks are using, and how they can incrementally improve things. A friend of mine has a Bluetooth enabled cell phone, and when it rings, the Outlook contact pops up on his Bluetooth enabled PC. He already understands how to use Outlook, he knows how to use his cell phone, and now they provide a higher-order value through this in-context integration. I know, obviously that Microsoft is involved in many initiatives clever devices: PocketPC, Smartphones, tablet PCs, game machines, and who knows what else. So how does that vision converge with the vision in collaboration technologies?
G: There are going to be some devices that will be more mobile, always with you. And you want to allow collaboration on that device to the extent of the fidelity possible on that the device. You won't want to bring down the fidelity of the entire collaboration session just to the least common denominator.
S: You don't want to force everyone to use WAP just because one guy is on his cell phone.
G: Right. One very important case for us is PDAs and Smartphones, and not particularly smart phones, too. We have a number of critical partnerships, specific development we are doing, and some research we are doing in Microsoft Beijing.
So I predict a big announcement at VON, where Microsoft throws off the wrappers, and unveils a truly revolutionary integration of LCS with telephony, especially involving smart presence on telephones and other wireless devices.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Telecommunications
October 11, 2004
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Girl Wonder [from girlwonder: The Womanless Web 2.0]
I'm not attending the Web 2.0 conference. But just looking at the schedule, isn't it interesting that the only woman speaker is Kim Polese? (And only two women are involved in leading workshops?)
In my experience, working-with-the-Web 1.0 has many more women, including women in management. Is it that when we get to the new new Internet, there's no room for female execs? Surely that's not the case. It's odd that the conference line-up would be so unrepresentative. (Previous O'Reilly conferences have had proportionately more women on the panel. What's with this one?)
Comments (2)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Events
Posted by Stowe Boyd
I was one of the usual suspects rounded up for a BusinessWeek piece on Internet Dating's seeming decline.
Olga Kharif [[from Online Dating Faces Rejection]
Social-networking sites, such as Friendster.com and FriendFinder.com, add to the competition. Already, both score higher on Alexa traffic tracker than traditional dating sites. Unlike the latter group's usual catalog of profiles, social-networking sites allow for more personal interaction. For instance, users of FriendFinder.com gather in chat rooms to exchange dating advice or play games. And Friendster.com allows users to talk, through voice over Internet protocol (VoIP) technology, via their PCs.
"When you deal with real people and not a catalog of profiles, you can't just walk away," says Stowe Boyd, president of tech researcher Corante Research in Reston, Va. "It's like breaking out of your social circle."
Internet dating sites are an out-of-context experience, and looking for a date should not be similar to buying a pair of shoes. You don't just type in "13 EEE" and look pictures of the arrayed results. It's totally bogus.
Ultimately, Internet dating sites will be socialized thtough the admixture of social software, and people will meet through real activities -- like politics, music, art, or other shared interests. Sites like MySpace and Suicide Girls are winning examples of how self-definition around some passion (like music or the counterculture) naturally engenders dating, while most dating sites have the same "empty hall" feeling that I've ranted about regarding social networking mazes like Orkut or Friendster. Minus the supposed alchemy of algorithmic matchmaking, most dating sites feel like one of those Eastern European wife-picking vacation packages, and just about as intellectually appealing.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
Posted by Stowe Boyd
I installed HitMaps on Get Real on 7 October, and four days later I finally got a hit someone in Japan! 
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
October 10, 2004
Posted by Marc Eisenstadt
SUMMARY: personal take on the 'what?', the 'so what?' and a bit of related history surrounding a relatively new phenomenon: podcasting
DETAILS (the what/so-what/history follow shortly):
There's been a lot of buzz about podcasting over the last 5-6 weeks, amply chronicled in particular by radio-afficionado-extraordinaire Doc Searls in his IT Garage item of Sept 28 2004 as well as numerous mentions in Doc's personal weblog; originator Adam Curry's open-source ipodder and surrounding site at ipodder.org (detailing the rapid evolution since Aug 22 2004, and providing links to the downloads, history, philosophy, etc.), and the huge-and-rapidly-growing selection of items (the links which follow go straight to the relevant articles) on Wired, Slashdot, NBC4, and others you can find yourself by Googling for: podcasting - for instance check out the WebTalkRadio interview with Doug Kay of ITConversations, about 38 minutes into this interview (MP3).
Podcasting: What?
Podcasting provides 'time-shifted radio' (think TiVo or Personal Video Recorder for audio) in the form of MP3 files automagically-downloaded (from sites you pre-select) to your personal MP3 player (e.g. while you sleep, or at work), so that you can 'grab-gadget-and-go' and listen to that audio on the move, as well as have your playlist automatically updated next time you 'dock' or connect to the net. Your pre-selected sites are in fact those obtained from a (rapidly growing) list of RSS 2.0 feeds that contain enclosures, namely the MP3 files themselves... but they could be anything, as there's already a vipodder for aggregating videoblogs. The 'pod' is from iPod, since the original ipodder scripts transferred files seamlessly to an iPod and iTunes, but in fact the tool is totally generic, and open source at that; it allows you to set up bitTorrent downloads if you like, and is extendible. Syncing with any gadget is pretty simple, as this podcasting -> PocketPC article shows. [update 11 Oct: fixed that PocketPC URL to one that has some step-by-step tips]
Podcasting: So what?
Podcasting glues-and-scripts-together a lot of things that are already available, but the big 'so what?' comes from the fact that until now nobody had really achieved the complete cradle-to-grave life cycle from out-in-the-ether -> RSS feed -> portable gadget, and in a way that was open source and extendible: this is what has really fired the imagination.
Sure, it is still a little geeky at this minute. Sure, the feeds tend to be a bit 'audioblog'-ish or 'tech-talk-radio'-ish. Sure, there are some way-cool time-shifted radio tools such as Replay Radio (check it out, by the way... I love it!), RadioRecorder for Mac, and hardware/software gizmos like Griffin Technology's Radio Shark. Sure, there are some do-it-yourself Streaming Internet Radio Station tools such as the venerable Shoutcast (which I used to great effect at Xmas 2000 with a bunch of 10-year-old kids to make their own school radio station).
But the excitement stems from the fact that none of the fantastic innovations I've just listed have (until now, that is) solved the problem of getting direct from the audio originator to the portable device in such a 'hands free' and remarkably scaleable manner. So forget what you see (or rather hear) right now. Think about the possibilities -- with one important caveat I have to add: I watched Shoutcast undergo a daily-doubling of growth with glee and excitement, only to see it peak at several thousand 'stations' (Shoutcast sources), and stay steady at that level for several years!! In theory, podcasting could witness a growth akin to the explosive growth of blogging, but I personally think one of the rate-limiting factors is simply the inability to quick-scan/judge/browse/edit/search-within audio files easily. So while they're an absolutely rich source of exciting commentary, independent music, new ideas we haven't yet thought up, and all kinds of open source spoken media (think foreign language materials, audiobooks, news, analysis, etc), I'm not getting worked up about the death of radio or anything like that.
Podcasting: Personal history flashback
Like many net old-timers I've met, and as you'll see in spades throughout Doc's site linked above, I grew up huddled around the glowing tubes ('valves' here in the UK) of my shortwave and AM radios. Indeed, I think some of the motivation for Voice over IP and Internet Radio has come from the 'hidden DX-er' in many of us. There have been many milestones along the way to the podcasting activities now generating all this excitement, but I just want to list four that stick out in my mind:
1. RealAudio / Progressive Networks (later to become RealPlayer and RealNetworks): Rob Glaser started Progressive Networks in February 1994, and RealAudio 1.0 was released in April 1995, immediately changing the face of (if not literally launching) 'net media'. People began to realise what was possible, and an entire industry was born. A personal highlight for me in 1995 was listening on my computer in the UK to the first-ever live-streamed sporting event, the Seattle Mariners playing the New York Yankees, with the first ball thrown out by the sons of Mickey Mantle.
2. AudioNet/Broadcast.com: Marc Cuban's AudioNet, later to become Broadcast.com, was founded in 1995 and soon became the largest customer of RealNetworks. They were the ultimate gateway/service, helping conventional radio stations reach out onto the Internet, particularly with live sports broadcasting. The old media worlds and new media worlds were jointly changing the face of radio. [In 1999, Cuban earned around two billion dollars by selling Broadcast.com to Yahoo! ] |