Quote
"I can’t think of anything that demonstrates the sovereign nature of the self better than a blog.” - Doc Searls
About the Author
Stowe Boyd is a well-known media subversive,
and an internationally recognized authority on real-time, collaborative
and social technologies. His new blog is Message.
|

Monthly Archives
October 31, 2005
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Over a year ago, Clay Shirky and I got into a complementary blog thread about the spammish emails that social network application, Multiply, was sending out: (see The Ten Commandments of Social Networking). This interchange led to me laying out the first seven of the Ten Commandments of Social Networking, which spawned The Operating Manual for Social Tools project.
I haven't really heard a peep from Multiply since, but today got an email alerting me to their having received some investment, which is leading them to develop a Japanese version.
I haven't heard much since I dropped out of all the social networking apps... is anything happening out there, or is the bloom off the rose?
Comments (18)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
Posted by Stowe Boyd
I caught up with Rick Klau, of Feedburner, and he shared his insights on the exploding market for RSS solutions, and with specific discussion around podcasting and Feedburner's direction.
This Get Real show is sponsored by GoToMeeting.
Comments (43)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Ok, I am breaking with tradition by discussing politics here, but I can't help it. Chris Nolan (who is participating at the upcomming Symposium on Social Architecture) asks, and answers, an important question:
[from Spot-On: Chris Nolan]
Who's going to be the next vice president of the United States?
My money's on Condi Rice.
Wow. That's one way to turn heads away -- at least momentarily -- from the stink emanating from the White House these days.
Comments (11)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Politics
October 30, 2005
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Guido van Nispen alerted me to this cool Technorati applet that calculates the value of your blog:
Inspired by Tristan Louis's research into the value of each link to Weblogs Inc, I've created this little applet using Technorati's API which computes and displays your blog's worth using the same link to dollar ratio as the AOL-Weblogs Inc deal.
But based on Get Real's Technorati rank of 1,220 (1,373 links from 500 sites), the value should be more llike $775K, based on the lowest value at Tristan's post! Must be a glitch in the calculation, or he rejiggered the value of a link way down.
So... if this metric is way off -- as Jason Calacanis makes a good case for, here, basically saying that other factors are just as, or more important that links, like traffic, demographics of readers, and so on -- Guido wants to know what should be a general metric of valuing blogs, if any?
I'm not certain that there is such a tool, although any time that a blog or blog media firm is purchased, something is going to be dreamed up. But I doubt that I could actually command thre quarters of a million for Get Real.
Comments (0)
| Category: Technology
October 29, 2005
Posted by Stowe Boyd
I think it is amazingly prescient that the folks at Nokia are going to start sending me new model cell phones to review, starting next month. There must have been a disturbance in the Van Allen Belt or something, because just before they contacted me, I had resolved to post a long and bitchy post about my most recent phone, a Sony Ericsson S710a.
I love the engineering of this phone. It looks great. It takes great pictures (except for the truly stupid shutter sound that cannot be turned off, although there are three more or less aggrevating versions of the shuttle sound -- I particularly hated this feature when shooting pictures at a school play featuring my younger son, recently) and that makes up for some of the negatives, but my problems with connectivity suggest a complete breakdown in product management by Sony Ericsson and Cingular, my carrier.
This is touted as an EDGE capable phone, and I am being charged the monthly fees that would -- in principle -- allow me to use the phone for email, web access, and so on, at EDGE speeds. And, of course. I would like to be able to use the phone as a modem, as I did with its predecessor, a Sony Erricsson T367. But all of that has been a failure, for months.
Yes, the bluetooth connectivity to and from my Mac works, as it did for the T367, so I am able to move photos and other stuff (like phone call recordings!) relatively easily fromt he phone. But theconnectivity stuiff just can't get set up. Why? It looks like Cingular caan't be bothered to figure out how its offerings actually work with the phones they are selling us.
Once you buy this phone from Cingular you have to go to the Sony Ericsson website to download the settings for email, for example. In my case -- perhaps because my phone number was ported from another carrier? -- I was being sent settings for SBC instead of Cingular. These did not work. And in the case of the EDGE settings, the Cingular people at my local store did not have the faintest idea how I should proceed, aside from directing me to call their tech support staff. I tried to call several times, but the wait was always too long for me. A tech support email to Sony Ericsson received a quick response, however, but directed me to a third party hobbyist's Mac modem settings, and two+ screenfulls of directions about what I needed to do to manually set my phone up. A close reading of that hobbyist's site suggests that I would have to do even more to get anything like EDGE speeds, though. I have yet to undertake that, partly because I would still need to garner necessary infromation from Cingular to make it work. I bet this would take several days of my time. Really. Look at the instructions:
[via email]
Dear Stowe Boyd,
Thank you for contacting Sony Ericsson Online Support.
The phone can support EDGE, however we do not supply the EDGE service. If you require certain scripts to access the EDGE network, you will need to download them.
If you are unable to access your email, by using the over the air configuration tool, you may need to contact your service provider to obtain the manuel email settings for your phone.
I have included the instructions below for inputting them into your phone.
If you are unable to set-up your e-mail using the OTA (Over the Air) configurator on www.sonyericsson.com or through your service provider, you can manually configure using the instructions below.
BEFORE YOU BEGIN, PLEASE MAKE SURE THAT YOU HAVE THE FOLLOWING:
- Internet account (A simple way of setting up an Internet account is to ask your service provider to send you a message that contains the required information to create an account automatically on your mobile phone)
- If you don·t have a Data account configured in your phone, please see the section, set-up a data connection, below. The additional settings needed from your service provider are listed in the section
- Service Provider/E-mail provider specific settings. Please see the section, Set-up E-mail, below
- Verify your ISP account offers POP3 or IMAP4 access.
DATA ACCOUNT AND EMAIL
Before you begin configuring e-mail, you need to have a data account. You can have several data accounts saved in your phone, with different settings for different purposes (for example, one for WAP and one for email). If you already have a data account in your phone, please go to the section, Set up email. If you don·t have a data account in your phone, please follow the instructions below.
SET-UP A DATA CONNECTION:
When manually setting up a Data Connection, you will need the following information from your ISP or GPRS provider:
- One of the following
* APN (Access Point Name) · For a GPRS / EDGE connection
* Access Phone Number · For a GSM connection
- User ID · The user name you use to connect to your account with the provider.
- User Password · The password you use to connect to your account with the provider.
1. [CONNECT] > [DATA COM] or [DATA COMMUNICATION] > [DATA ACCOUNTS] > [NEW ACCOUNT]
2. Highlight [EDGE DATA] or [GSM DATA], press "Select"
3. Enter the name that you want to associate with this connection and press "Continue"
4. Highlight the [APN] field (for a GPRS connection) or the [PHONE NO.] field (for a GSM connection), then press "Edit"; then fill in the information from your provider and press "OK".
5. Highlight [USER NAME], press "Edit"; then fill in the your User ID and press "OK".
6. Highlight [PASSWORD], press "Edit"; then fill in the your password and press "OK".
7. Press "Save" to complete your data connection set up.
NOTE: You can create and store several data connections in your phone.
FOR GPRS DATA CONNECTIONS ONLY:
1. Highlight the account you just created and press "Edit"
2. Select IP Address and enter the IP address for the gateway, "Save".
SET-UP E-MAIL:
Please contact your service provider or e-mail provider for the following settings:
- Incoming server address (POP3 server) and port · which identifies the computer where your incoming email messages are stored.
- Outgoing server address (SMTP server) and port· which identifies the computer through which your outgoing email messages are sent.
- Email address
- Email User name
- Email Password
1. [MESSAGES] > [EMAIL] > [SETTINGS]
2. Choose [NEW ACCOUNT], press "Add"
3. Enter a name for the email account, for example Home or Office, press "OK"
4. Choose [CONNECT USING]
5. Choose the data account that you created earlier to use with this email account
6. Choose [PROTOCOL] - POP 3 or IMAP 4. POP 3 is the most common.
7. Choose [INCOMING SERVER]. Enter the name or IP address of the service provider for incoming email messages.
8. Choose [INCOMING PORT]. If needed, change the port used by the protocol you are using.
9. Choose [ENCRYPTION] > [INCOMING SERVER] or [OUTGOING SERVER]; If you want encryption, you will be prompted for your domain.
10. Choose [MAILBOX]. Enter the username for your email account.
11. Choose [PASSWORD]. Enter a password for your email account. Your service provider will alternatively request a password on connection.
12. Choose [OUTGOING SERVER]. Enter the name or IP address of the SMTP server to be able to send email messages.
13. Choose [OUTGOING PORT]. If needed, change the port used by the SMTP protocol.
14. Choose [EMAIL ADDRESS]. Your Internet service provider supplies you with your email address.
15. Choose [DOWNLOAD]. Choose whether to receive [HEADERS & TEXT] or [HEADERS ONLY].
16. Choose [FROM NAME]. Enter your name. This will appear in outgoing email messages. This is not mandatory.
17. Choose [SIGNATURE]. Choose if you want to add a signature to your email messages. This is not mandatory.
18. Choose [COPY OUTGOING]. Choose [ON], if you want email messages sent from your phone to be sent to an additional email address of your choice. This way, your sent messages are copied and can be saved for future reference. This is not mandatory.
19. Choose [CHECK INTERVAL]. Choose how often you want the phone to connect to your email server and check for incoming email messages. This is not mandatory.
DEFAULT ACCOUNT:
If you have both an office and a home email account, you can set one of them as default.
1. [MESSAGES] > [EMAIL] > [SETTINGS]
2. Select the account that you want to use as default.
As part of Sony Ericsson's commitment to excellent customer service, we offer a wide variety of mobile products to suit your lifestyle. If you require more information, or have any other questions, please visit our website at http://www.sonyericsson.com or call us at 1-866-766-9374
Best regards,
Kim
Your Sony Ericsson Online Support Representative
Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications
So, I am baffled. Why build all these features into the phone and the service, if the product folks can't be bothered to make them work? If it is possible for some passionate amateur to get this to work, why doesn't Sony Ericsson, Cingular, or both, license his solution and/or his advice and make something that is installable, so that I could simply register for the service, and click 'ok' a few times?
Despite the fact that the phone has many good features, I am on the prowl again. Not for a better phone, per se, but one that balances features -- yes, I need the ability to record phone calls, and I will always want a good camera in my phone -- with product integration: I need the service and the phone features to actaully meet in the middle, not leave it up to me to hack it together. Either make it downloadable, or put it in the phone to begin with. I don't want to debug the phone, I just want it to do what's advertised. But I also lust for more fuctionality. I admit it. So here's my current wislist for the dream phone:
- 3Gish connectivity: I want to be able to connect to the web from my phone, both directly -- for IM, web browsing, email, or specialized apps -- or indirectly, as a modem for my Mac. And I would like it to be fast, please: as fast as possible.
- Camera - At least 1.5 M pixels, plus other features. Email photos, various lighting and special effect settings. A real lens system? The S710a has a light, which is cool and good for other purposes, too. I also like the video capability of the S701a, but its too time limited -- I really need at least 30 mins -- and the ability to use an external mic. Strangely, my phone supports speaker phone capabilities (necessary!) but no way to use that when videoing (or else it is always used, and there is no way to know).
Bluetooth -- Truly essential for syncing and connectivity. Don't want an additional cable so Bluetooth is critical, although I would be willing to accept a cable if it did other things, like USB charging of the phone, or firewire connectivity to camera/camcorder capabilities. Also, I would like my phone to be able to play nice with my Skype or other online VoIP accounts. So when the desktop VoIP tool 'rings' it would be directed to my cell phone, if I were in Bluetooth range. And, likevice, I would be able to call out on my cell phone, directed through the VoIP solution.
- Speaker phone - 'nuff said.
- Geopositioning -- Never have had it, but after using my wife's GPS unit, I want it. Also would like to have geolocation associated with metadata of other media: photo, video, and audio.
- PDA fetaures -- I make extensive use of the calendar and address book on my phone, in the obvious ways. I would like hyperlink there, so if I include a URL is an event, for example, I could click on it and open the phone browser pointing to a map, or a website, for example.
- iTunes -- Why the hell not? My phone is much bigger than a Nano, so it seems reasobably to only lug one gizmo around. Besides, I am not using the PDA extras on my iPod at all, so that's a waste. And now that there is a video iPod there will soon be a...
- Video iPod Phone -- All the above plus video. I like the idea of being able to not only watch video podcasts, or stream TV, but more importantly, to converse face-to-face through my phone with video just like I do through my Mac with iChat now. This is the killer feature: video phones at last!
I can dream, can't I?
Comments (20)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Telecommunications
Posted by Stowe Boyd
I had the opportunity to chat with Lee Wilkins, VP Products & Strategy for Podcast.com, to get his take on podcast directories and what his company is trying to accomplish.
The Get Real show is sponsored by GoToMeeting.com.
Comments (37)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
October 27, 2005
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Due to a communications black out (Greg's cable is on the fritz), we are forced to push today's scheduled Podcasting on Windows to tomorrow, Friday 28 Oct at 1pm ET. Greg will be reviewing iTunes, Yahoo, and other directories, and I have an interview with Lee Wilkins, co-founder of Podcast.com. Be there!
Comments (38)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Events
October 26, 2005
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Hugh (gapingvoid) Macleod sent this along as a comment, referring to the recent post, Nicholas Carr and Om Malik on Who Owns The Commons:
Reminds me of the most bizarre moment of Les Blogs in April... when a French journo started asking Barak Berkowitz, the CEO of Six Apart what he thought his company's social responsibility should be.
"You make tools for ze people but you have no sense of ze social responsibility!!"
I'm guessing MT wasn't beholden enough to the French State and its regulations for the journo's liking.
Like, Barak should spend twenty years ticking off the social responsibilty boxes before being allowed to sell some poor Frenchman a piece of $100 software, just in case something bad happens down the road.
I dunno, the more fertile a field we plough collectively, the more people are going to try to build individual silos on it. That is human nature.
But silos are easy to knock down. Even Google is starting to show chinks in its armor.
The thing is, some people like silos. They like the comfort and status belonging to one affords to them. They're just not used to the idea of silos being vulnerable.
Comments (34)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category:
Posted by Stowe Boyd

AIM is working hard to collar the all-important youth market, and has respun the AOL tools into a Nerdvana style client (see various Nerdvana postings) where everything is based on the buddy list. Although (for shame!) it is not available for Mac OS.
I expect this to be one of the areas of future battle between MSN, Yahoo, Google, and AOL: who will develop the best integration of communication, collaboration, and coordination tools based on the "buddy list is the center of the universe" motif?
They are focussing on communication first (leaving aside blog-style, asynchronous style stuff, which doesn't look like it is integrated yet). What is missing to date: calendaring, media sharing (real-time or slow-time a la Flickr and Last.fm), and project collaboration (a la Basecamp). Inevitably, these will all coallesce. No one has the who story, and whoever releases the critical mass beta will likely destabilize the marketplace.
Comments (4)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
October 25, 2005
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Stan James has created a fascinating fusion of social networks and web experience in a project and technology called Outfoxed. James has developed a plug=in for the Firefox browser to allow users to rely on their networks of trusted advisors before taking any actions that could have major consequences.
James' descriptions of his motivations (the whole thing is the outgrowth of his master's thesis at the University of Osnabrück, Germany: Trusted Metadata Distribution Using Social Networks) and how the technology is intended to work are -- honestly -- more compelling than the implementation, today [... read full post at Centrality]
Comments (20)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Liz Lawley points out that the folks at the Web 2.0 conference are doing a better job than last year on the male/female balance of speakers:
I hadn't noticed, since I was spending all my time in the unconference out in the hall and in meetings, but there were eight women out of 107 speakers. Way better than last year's three.
Comments (39)
+ TrackBacks (26) | Category: Events
October 24, 2005
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Over the past months, I have been in contact with a growing roster of really amazing visionaries, those that are making Web 2.0 a reality. People like Catarina Fake and Stuart Butterfield of Flickr, Dave Sifry of Technorati, Jason Fried of 37Signals, and Felix Petersen of Plazes.com, to mention just a few.
I am launching a new project, one that will open up the interactions I have been having with these people, and allow me to also return to video, a format I haven't used very much since the late '90s. Starting this week, I am starting the production of "New Visionaries: Rebooting The Web" where I will be conducting interviews with people who are advancing what people are calling web 2.0.
I like the image of rebooting the web: not just adding a teensy bit more to it, but messing with its internals so seriously that you have to restart the machine to use the new stuff. Steven Johnson recently used a similar sort of analogy in characterizing this web 2.0 shift:
[from Web 2.0 Arrives, pointer from 106 Miles to Chicago]
The result is the equivalent of a massive software upgrade for the entire Web, what some commentators have taken to calling Web 2.0. Essentially, the Web is shifting from an international library of interlinked pages to an information ecosystem, where data circulate like nutrients in a rain forest.
Yes, a dense, rich, and interconnected collection of newly tooled applications, that build on what others offer and give back to the system, allowing others to build on them in turn.
Who are these visionaries? What do they share in common? What is driving them? Where is it heading? Can the big companies -- like Yahoo, Google, and Microsoft -- channel whatever these forces are, or will they simply keep on snapping up smaller, more innovative web 2.0 companies as they emerge? What are the business models? Who will be the winners in this newly recast race, and what does winning mean?
[tags: web+2.0, new visionaries, Dave Sifry, Felix Petersen, Plazes.com, Stuart Butterfield, Flickr, Catarina Fake, Jason Fried, 37signalsdel.icio.us, Joshua Schachter, Steven Johnson]
Comments (9)
+ TrackBacks (4) | Category: Technology
October 21, 2005
Posted by Stowe Boyd
I am glad to say that things fell our way -- meaning a change in travel plans -- so that Liz Lawley (of Many-2-Many and Mamamusings) will be able to join us at the Symposium on Social Architecture, coming up on 15 November at Harvard. She'll be leading a session called "Is Social Software A Mirror Or A Lens?"
"We make our tools, and they shape us." – Kenneth Bouldin
Does social software reinforce existing structures—power, gender,
class—or transcend them? Does it level the field? Do folksonomies or
metrics derived from social gestures create a tyranny of the majority?
What is the role of social tool makers and early adopters in these
patterns? How do different people—geography, class, age—differ in their
responses and adoption of social technologies? Can we use social tools
to benefit personal, individual ends as well as civic, collective ones?
How does social technology engender different forms of social
interaction?
Liz is phenomenal. It will be a joy to see her again.
Comments (12)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category:
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Jon Udell is surprised that the blogosphere didn't megalink to Clive Thompson's Sunday New York Times piece, Meet the Life Hackers, an attempt to dig into the issues and answers to living in an interupt-driven world. I riffed on it (see Meet The Life Hackers), but I think that Clive Thompson merely turned over a bunch of rocks -- mostly Microsoft projects -- and added a few shallow insights from the conventional wisdom jar. So I disagree with Udell's surprise at the blogosphere not bubbling about it all:
[from Jon Udell: Attention economics]
You'd think that Clive Thompson's article Meet the Life Hackers, in this week's New York Times Magazine, would have produced a storm of commentary. After all, it's a major mainstream outing of Linda Stone's evocative phrase "continuous partial attention," Danny O'Brien's seminal talk on the seven habits of highly effective geeks, and Merlin Mann's 43 Folders. Yet the blogosphere has reacted less vigorously than it would have a year ago.
The CPA meme has been around a long time, and despite the recent reappearance of Linda Stone at Supernova, neither Udell nor Thompson comment on the fact that she advanced the concept of continuous partial attention as a disorder, something to be struggled against, not as a workable response to the world. Likewise, 43 Folders and O'Brien's thoughts are not new revelations, and Thompson's piece seems to poke at the issues but not come to any real conclusions.
And Udell sort of trivializes the fact that younger people are more likely to split attention across various media or activities at the same time:
It's often suggested that this [interruptibility] isn't a problem for generation X, Y, or Z, the new breeds of post-humans who've adapted to continuous partial attention. I don't completely buy that argument, and neither does Clive Thompson.
And why don't they buy it? All the recent evidence about concurrent media exposure (see Concurrent Media Exposure: Another Form Of Continuous Partial Attention) demonstrates a strong age polarity in this regard: the younger you are, the more likely you are to split your attention over mutliple forms of media at once. Udell's handwave argument is so anecdotal as to be immaterial: some researchers who had some students reply in an informal discussion that they wanted to be "saved" from interrupts and split attention.
This is another battle in the war against continuous partial attention, which is a culture war. Various forces -- mainstream media, large organizations, and others threatened by a dimuition of their power -- would like us to focus just on one channel at a time, especially when that is their channel. The recent example of the WSJ's D3 conference requiring attendees to not multitask on their laptops while attending is a great case in point:
[from The War On Continuous Partial Attention]
But this is just another attack on continuous partial attention, which is, at its core, an allegiance to broadcast, mediated, unsocialized communications. In this case, the WSJ -- although you can replace it with any institution, such as a corporation laying down rules for behavior in meetings, for example -- wants full attention on the official speakers, and no side channel discussions. But in a many-to-many world, where individuals want to participate in unmediated discussions, and who believe that their social connectedness is more important and strategic than the task at hand, as a general rule, The WSJ's iron-fisted approach to stamping out back channel IMing will anger the most connected and ruin the conference for us.
I am all for being "productive", but I want to be able to define what it means. And any piecework model -- where my productivity is solely measured by the number of pins I crank out every day -- will be a poor picture of productivity. I am open to being distracted by my social universe, and I am willing to accept that interrupt to help them make progress, at the expense of personal productivity. I IM during meetings, because I want to remain in touch with the larger world.
The backchannel may be of the foremost interest to me, and what may appear to be the foreground activity may actually be on the back burner, for me.
These are all indications that the war for attention is a power struggle, and those that couch it in terms of personal productivity and manners are actually trying to slow or counter a revolution in the making. We are rejecting the centralized control of our personal agenda. I am willing to pay the costs of remaining socially engaged -- through continuous partial attention, remaining interruptible, and exchanging social capital with others along the way. Make no mistake about it, it's a struggle for attention freedom.
Comments (10)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
October 20, 2005
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Just a reminder that the next in our Podcasting on Windows webcasts is today at 1pm ET. Joining me will be Rick Klau of Feedburner, and the topic is Online Services for Podcasting.
click for webcast URL
Conference Call: Dial-in #: 563 843 7500
Passcode: 8524544507
Meeting ID: 335-176-717
Podcasting on Windows is sponsored by GoToMeeting.
Comments (45)
+ TrackBacks (1) | Category: Events
October 19, 2005
Posted by Stowe Boyd
I went to Blogon this week, and the highlight was... Peter Hirshberg's lunch presentation...
Comments (9)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Events
Posted by Stowe Boyd
I have completely gone over to Gmail, Google's online email service. I don't even try to use Apple's Mail app anymore. Principally, I love the tags ("labels") that Gmail provides as a simple technique of organizing, plus the lightning fast search. But, what about offline access?
There are rumors that Google is at work on something more sophisticated than the existing Google Desktop ( a Windows-only app, which is one of the reasons they are in the hall of shame), which would allow offline caching of all sorts of Google related information... in my case, most specifically I want what Kottke called a "Baby step: make Gmail readable offline" -- but I also want to be able to create emails while offline, too.
Why doesn't some enterprising soul build a Mac widget to do this? Isn't the API available? There must be six hundred Gmail notifier apps and widgets, all doing the same thing: why doesn't someone build a mini-tool to do this:
- Let me sync the email in my inbox to my Mac before going offline
- allow me to read it while offline
- let me create replies while offline
- let me post the offline replies when I go back online
I would even tolerate someone charging me for the tool, or pushing their ads at me while I am synching up.
Yes, I realize that I could (possibly) configure Apple Mail, or Mozilla, or something to sort of do this. But it seems more attractive to have a small, llightweight, dedicated app to do this, rather than fool around with a big fat app.
[Update 20 Nov: I realized this morning I left out a few things off my wishlist. I'd like the tool to retain Gmail goodies like the 'labels' I use to tag everything. For example, if I am reading an email offline, I would like to tag it as 'Blogon' and then when I later on sync the offline cache back to Google, the label would be applied there. I really don't need the app to act like a mail client -- I don't want it to support posting emails through Comcast or other ISPs, for example -- but just to sync with Gmail. If I create a reply to an email, I want the tool to sync that into the outbox in Gmail when I get back to the Web, not to send it itself.]
Comments (9)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Andrew Rasiej, the Founder and Publisher of the Personal Democracy Forum, will be joining us at the Symposium for Social Architecture on Nov 15th at Harvard. Andrew's activities most recently were in the spotlight as a result of his candidacy for Public Advocate of New York City, running in the Democratic primary. Although his bid for that post was unsuccessful, his platform -- which included elements such as municipal wifi -- drew a great deal of attention on a national level. Many writers, including Tom Friedman and me, saw something significant in his orientation to the issues he brought into the debate. Andrew will be participating in our session called "Katrina and Recovery 2.0: A Case Study in Web-based Civics".
Andrew has been deeply involved in the application of technology to politics, and has served as an advisor to Senators and Congressman and political candidates on the use of Information Technology for campaign and policy purposes since 1999. In 2001, he addressed the United States Senate Democratic Caucus in the Capital Building on the "Digital Divides Facing Democratic Party" and has been actively involved in the campaigns of many Senators and Congressmen. For the 2004 Presidential race he served as Chairman of the Howard Dean Technology Advisory Council. An accomplished entrepreneur and media figure, Andrew will be a great addition to our Symposium.
Jeff Jarvis, who was hoping to attend the Symposium, and who has played an invaluable role in its formation, has a insurmountable conflict, and will not be with us at Harvard, alas. But with Andrew and Chris Nolan (and others in the works) the Web-based Civics session is going to be very interesting, nonetheless.
Comments (4)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Events
October 18, 2005
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Nick Carr wrote a great piece, The Amorality of Web 2.0, intentionally throwing cold water on the Web 2.0 party. His central point, to my mind -- after suggesting that Web 2.0 is a cultish mindset, that Wikipedia is inadequate, and amateurism leads to shoddy products -- is the contention that Web 2.0 is amoral:
Like it or not, Web 2.0, like Web 1.0, is amoral. It's a set of technologies - a machine, not a Machine - that alters the forms and economics of production and consumption. It doesn't care whether its consequences are good or bad. It doesn't care whether it brings us to a higher consciousness or a lower one. It doesn't care whether it burnishes our culture or dulls it. It doesn't care whether it leads us into a golden age or a dark one. So let's can the millenialist rhetoric and see the thing for what it is, not what we wish it would be.
But, here, Carr is really howling at the moon. All technological advances that are driven by individual user adoption are chaotic, and unreflective. Individuals decide to move farther from the center of town, pushing urban sprawl, increasing our collective reliance on fossil fuels, and causing traffic jams. And our society zigs in a direction that some applaud and others lament.
His arguments are true but not helpful. The individual choices that are being made -- for example, individuals opting to upload pictures to Flickr or creating tags in Technorati -- are not explicitly attempting to put librarians or newspapers out of business, and they are not reflecting on the potential long-term impacts that could arise from seemingly modest and personal decisions made to better their own lives in a small way. Not do I think that thundering from the pulpit about the amorality of the eventual impacts -- if indeed they turn out to be so -- will make a whit of a difference.
Om Malik read Nick's piece, and attacked the same issues in a different key, arguing about ownership of all this volunteer effort in enriching the web with web 2.0 gestures:
[from Om Malik’s Broadband Blog — � Web 2.0, Community & the Commerce Conundrum]
if this culture of participation was seemingly help build businesses on our collective backs. So if we tag, bookmark or share, and help del.icio.us or Technorati or Yahoo become better commercial entities, aren’t we seemingly commoditizing our most valuable asset - time. We become the outsourced workforce, the collective, though it is still unclear what is the pay-off. While we may (or may not) gain something from the collective efforts, the odds are whatever “the collective efforts” are, they are going to boost the economic value of those entities. Will they share in their upside? Not likely!
Here, Om gets down to something I think is potentially amoral: the appropriation of the new commons -- our shared space on the web -- by the folks that create the web 2.0 tools that are allowing us to populate it.
It is essential that we devise some point of leverage, perhaps a mechanism something like creative commons or copyleft, for the myriad social gestures we are strewing across the web. Yes, I would like Del.icio.us, Technorati, Flickr and others to be able to aggregate my tags, comments, links, and mutterings wherever I leave them on the web. But to the extent that they dream up ways to make money from them, I would like my share. And most important, I don't want to have to pay to gain entry to the world that we all are creating.
Om is dead on: "This is something we need to discuss."
Comments (1)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Clive Thompson wrote a good piece at the New York Times on our interrupt-driven world (although there is a leetle too much Microsoft in there). Thompson doesn't provide a pointless list of conventional wisdom how-tos, but instead examines the real imperatives of how we live now, splitting our attention across a bunch of different projects, activities, and goals, and responding all day long to an endless series of interrupts.
[from Meet the Life Hackers - New York Times]
Yet while interruptions are annoying, Mark's study also revealed their flip side: they are often crucial to office work. Sure, the high-tech workers grumbled and moaned about disruptions, and they all claimed that they preferred to work in long, luxurious stretches. But they grudgingly admitted that many of their daily distractions were essential to their jobs. When someone forwards you an urgent e-mail message, it's often something you really do need to see; if a cellphone call breaks through while you're desperately trying to solve a problem, it might be the call that saves your hide. In the language of computer sociology, our jobs today are "interrupt driven." Distractions are not just a plague on our work - sometimes they are our work. To be cut off from other workers is to be cut off from everything.
As we switch to a real-time basis for our work and lives, we will need to adopt new strategies for coping with the disruption this causes. Rejection of real time is not a successful strategy, because business is moving onto a real time footing, and people have to move along, or be bounced. We are all part of a new ethos, rapidly emerging in the world of instant messaging, RSS feeds, VoIP presence, blackberries, and always-on-cellular communication. Finding a balance between complete interruptibility and complete inaccessibility is core to our success in accomodating the new pressures on our time and attention.
Thompson's focus on gizmos -- like bigger computer screens -- as a means to better deal with life's complexities, is interesting but ultimately not relevant. The social aspects of real time life will swamp any specific technology's impacts. I believe in tools, but effective application requires changes in behavior. For example, effective use of IM in groups means people must adopt the five cardinal rules of IM:
- Turn on your IM client, and leave it on. (The Turn It On rule).
- Change your IM state as your state changes. (The Coffee Break rule.)
- It is not impolite to ping people. (The Knock-Knock rule.)
- It is not impolite to ignore people. (The I'm Busy rule.)
- Try IM first. (The IM First rule.)
Comments (2)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
Posted by Stowe Boyd
I am glad to say that JD Lasica (New Media Musings) will be leading one of the sessions at the upcoming Symposium for Social Architecture: How Will The Social Web Change Media? JD will do a great job, and is bringing together some great contributors for the session.
Chris Nolan (SpotOn -- note: new domain!), one of the most vocal leaders of the "stand alone journalism" movement, will be joining Jeff Jarvis and others in a session dedicated to what we can learn from the role the web does and does not play in disaster preparedness and response (A Case Study In Web-Based Civics: Katrina and Recovery 2.0).
The conference is shaping into something really fascinating. I spent sometime yesterday, at Blogon, chatting with Kaliya Hamlin, who will be joining me in my session (Is Business Ready For Social Software?). She suggested that we examine the asymmetries in relationships between individuals and businesses, and the likelihood that people will increasingly demand more symmetric relationships. As just one example, Kaliya maintains that people will want to retain information about their purchasing history, and not simply cede it to those businesses that we do business with. And, we may want to invert the normal course of business, based on this information. Imagine that I am traveling to San Francisco, and I could publish some version of my hotel rental history and interests through some as now unavailble solution (a mirror-image of eBay, perhaps?) that would allow hotels to publish bids to me for rooms. This general observation about increasing the symmetry in relationships through social technologies will be a springboard into related within-the-business topics, as well. I believe that social tools are inherently subversive, because they will disrupt established patterns of authority, and naturally push business toward acting as more democratic swarmocracies.
I spoke for a few moments with Mary Hodder, who will be leading a session as well: Engines of Meaning: How Will We Scale Our Understanding? I lifted the "engines of meaning" meme from Bruce Sterling:
Ultimately no human brain, no planet full of human brains, can possibly catalog the dark, expanding ocean of data we spew. In a future of information auto-organized by folksonomy, we may not even have words for the kinds of sorting that will be going on; like mathematical proofs with 30,000 steps, they may be beyond comprehension. But they'll enable searches that are vast and eerily powerful. We won't be surfing with search engines any more. We'll be trawling with engines of meaning.
Mary and others will dig into this critical question: how will be make sense of the expanding blob of human discourse that makes up the Web?
For more information and registration for the Symposium, click here.
Comments (4)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Events
Posted by Stowe Boyd
I emailed Seam O'Malley, director product management, Yahoo messenger, about the MSN/Yahoo deal, trying to get the skinny on what it means:
[via email]
Stowe: Will the interoperability be more than text messaging?
Sean: In addition to exchanging text IM messages, people will be able to see friends' presence, share select emoticons, add new contacts from either service. There are also plans to extend interop. to PC-to-PC calling capabilities. People do not need to have two separate IDs for both services to take advantage of interop. E.g. A Yahoo! Messenger user will be able to log in and take advantage of the above features with MSN Messenger users.
Stowe: Specifically, will voice, video, and multi-user chat be supported?
Sean: There are plans to extend interop. to PC-to-PC calling capabilities.
Stowe: Is there any plan for general interoperability? Namely, interoperability with AIM, Skype, and others?
Stowe: Right now we are focused on the complexities around connecting these two communities - which will take months to implement. This is a non-exclusive deal and we look forward to exploring opportunities to interoperate safely and securely with other IM communities.
Stowe: What about integration with other Yahoo contact list oriented solutions, like Yahoo 360?
Sean: While this will not be a part of the initial launch in Q2 2006, we will continue to evaluate new features and innovate and deliver enhanced services to our users.
So it does look like an attempt to consolidate in response the the Skype/eBay colossus, and the growing threat of Google: Gtalk is just the tip of an iceberg.
Comments (2)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
Posted by Stowe Boyd
I was dismayed by Seth Godin's kickoff keynote at Blogon yesterday. It was really just the eBook he releases last week as part of the luanch of his new Squidoo venture. It was -- despite his posturing that the keynote was an attempt at motivating more general notions -- just a pitch for the company. Susan does a good job detailing the pitch:
[from Susan Mernit's Blog: BlogOn Kick Off: Seth Godin's Kick Off--AKA Commercial]
Recap: BlogOn?s key note by Seth Godin is a 20minute commercial for his new product, yet another tool set to harness bloggers to generate pages that can make Google Ad Words $$ for someone who has $250,000 to build a platform
AM I jaded, or is this really off focus for a conference kick off?
leaving aside Seth's motivations for the talk, which really runs against the grain of my personal expectations for a conference keynote, the Squidoo concept is interesting, although small. It's a simple premise: search a la Google yeilds too much. People need guidance rather than 100 million hits. So why not contrive authoritative guides to the inifinity of areas people might be interested in?
Jarvis seems to be taken with the idea, at least in a small way.
I think static "lenses" of the sort that Seth has envisioned are the wrong approach however. I have written a bunch about search as a shared space: new approaches to search (the primary way that people find stuff) where an individual or a group of people can augment the mechanized results of a Google-like search with reorganization of the contents, filtering out junk, adding comments and new links, and making sense of the chaos in general. Products like JetEye and Rollyo are examples. These are persistent, and growing search spaces. Instead of a static Squidoo lens on some topic I am arguably expert in, like Web 2.0 Apps, I might create a search space of this sort, leveraging key words, tags, specific sources, and the like.
So, Squidoo faces competition from the traditional search engines, but in the long run, it will be running up against the proliferation of these value-added search-as-shared-space offerings. And my bet is on the latter, especially as those features emerge in the majors. I anticipate social, shared search any time in the My Search History feature set at Google, for example. Yahoo and Microsoft are likely to follow.
Comments (1)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Events
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Yahoo seems to be sucking up a lot of good people recently, like Ian Kennedy (who I bumped into yesterday at BlogOn) and now, Tom Coates:
[from Farewell BBC - and hello Yahoo! (plasticbag.org)]
I'm leaving the BBC to go and work for Bradley Horowitz in the Tech Development Group at Yahoo! (alongside Simon Willison and Jeremy Zawodny among others). My particular special skill - I gather - is going to be the power of my social media mojo, undercut with my feral design instincts. I'll be based in London but out in the States pretty regularly - and here's the best bit - playing with the Flickr team and the Upcoming crew and all the folks over at Yahoo Research Berkeley (among others). Anyway, as is probably fairly evident, this is not the kind of opportunity you turn down without a very good reason, and I've wracked my brains and I sure as hell can't think of one. So wish me luck!
So, now that Yahoo is amassing all this talent in one group, what can we expect to see bubbling out in the next little while? I have to get in there and find out.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Chris does a good job of recommending simple policies to help decrease spam blogs from taking over the universe:
[from Ten Suggestions for Google's Blogspot (Chris Pirillo)]
Probationary Period. Only allow new users to create a limited amount of blogs. Say, only one for the first three months. Then, if that goes well, let 'em create six. Then, if THAT goes well, let 'em create six more.
Comments (7)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
October 17, 2005
Posted by Stowe Boyd
I am attending BlogOn today, in New York. Mike Sigal of Guidewire told me last night that the conference is going to be packed -- good for the hosts, but less so for attendees struggling to get an IP address on the conference wifi router. I may be out of touch most of the day.
A reminder: Thursday at 1pm, Greg Narain and I are co-hosting the next Podcasting on Windows show, and we will be joined by Rick Klau of Feedburner. The topic is Online Services -- a fast run through the many solutions out there to help podcasters, like blogging systems, RSS services, and podcasting directories.
URL for webcast: https://www.gotomeeting.com/join/335176717
Conference Call: Dial-in #: 563 843 7500
Passcode: 8524544507
Meeting ID: 335-176-717
Podcasting on Windows is sponsored by GoToMeeting.
Comments (82)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Corante
October 16, 2005
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Over at Many-2-Many, danah boyd discusses what may be the central challenge to group blogs' continued existence: they are usually oriented toward a topical focus, like "public relations" or "social software." Some topics, like sex and politics, will never be played out, it seems, while others can be. Coupled with the human tendancy to shift focus, group blogs tend to fall apart.
But, as cousin danah points out, personal blogs are different:
[from Web 2.0 and Many-To-Many]
The thing about a personal blog is that it changes with you because you don’t feel so compelled to stick with a topic (much to the chagrin of some readers).
[...]
Herein lies the problem with all of this… Our lives have started to escape categories. And topical blogs are categories. Hmmm…
I think that the replacement for this is coming. Rather than create topical group blogs, people will simply coallesce around the same (or very similar) tags, which will define a topicspace, a tagspace. Today, we don't actually do much with those spaces: for example, all the posts tagged "PR" at Technorati don't amount to a real destination, like a group blog does, but is just a luanching pad for people to go elsewhere. However, if someone -- like Corante, perhaps -- were to aggregate the writings of people -- like the individual contributors to Many-2-Many, and let's say another leading 100 writers on things related to the huiman use of the Web -- tagspaces would emerge. "Web 2.0" would explode, for example. A company like Corante could direct some editorial digest on what the most interesting pieces are for any day, and that tagspace could become a real meeting point for people interested in the topic. Years later (perhaps) if the topic cools, readers and contributors would wander off, just like people looking for the cool new cafe, or the trendiest nightspot. The individuals would still be blogging, just touching on new topics. To some extent, that's why I shifted this back to a solo project: then I can touch on anything that interests me. I can grow in whatever direction, not hemmed in by the topic of the blog.
Comments (1)
+ TrackBacks (1) | Category: Media
October 15, 2005
Posted by Stowe Boyd
A comment in a recent post alerted me to YAW2.0A (Yet-Another-Web-2.0-App -- yes, it was bound to happen) called Blinklist. At first glance, it looks like del.icio.us meets Ajax, with a number of cool tag cloud options.
I imported my del.icio.us bookmarks with no hiccups, although the default is to make all bookmarks private. There is a 'powertool' to turn them all public, which I did. Then I hit a snag that stopped me in my tracks. While all my tags were imported without a warning, all the compound tags I have created with a "+" in them, like "Fred+Wilson", don't work. If you click on one you get a "can't find 'Fred Wilson'" messgae, where the "+" has been turned into a " ". That's a show stopper for me. I am not going to manually hack all those plus signs into something else, and I hate the wikiword style of mushing words together.
Other things look good, like RSS export, sharing with people, organizing bookmarks into groups, and more.
I hope they fix this so I can try a real experiment for a week or so.
Comments (2)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Over at Centrality, I posted a new piece about XFN:
[from Centrality]
I spent some time last week at the Web 2.0 conference chatting with Tantek Celik, of Technorati, about microformats, the XHTML approach to adding more sorts of information into HTML URIs: the hyperlinks that weave the Web together. I wrote a longish post at Get Real about the use of microformats for providing various sorts of personal or corporate information, like event and contact information. But one of the standards being developed under the microformats banner is XFN, or XHTML Friends Network, which provides a means to denote the nature of social relationships within hyperlinks in a way that could be automatically accessed by XFN-knowledgeable tools.
Read the rest...
Comments (73)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
October 14, 2005
Posted by Stowe Boyd
I installed Feedblitz at Get Real yesterday to get away from the flood of spurious, spammer email addresses. Since yesterday afternoon, I have accumulated 5 valid and 20+ bogus emails. Definitely a great set up, where Feedblitz confirms the email addresses on your behalf.
[Update: really long and detailed review of Feedblitz at Improbulus, here].
Comments (2)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Jeremy goes nuts for how great plugins are in general, and specifically the new plugin for listening to Yahoo Podcasts (see Yahoo! Podcasts Plugin for Yahoo! Music Engine) but never mentions its a Windows executable. I guess it's not so awesome for Mac users, eh, Jeremy?
What I am getting is a big barf from iTunes on all Yahoo podcasts: "playlist format is not recognized." I'm sure I'll discover this requires an upgrade of something, but isn't it just supposed to work?
Comments (12)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Michael Graves at Verisign has immediately picked up on the "pingwidth" term I introduced the other day, and more importantly, chimes in on the likely demand for fatter and fatter pings:
[from Welcome to the Infrablog: Word of the Day: Pingwidth]
As Stowe Boyd suggests in his reply, there is demand and usefulness for fat pings. Pings that come not just with the URL-based information contained in the basic ping above, but also metadata like:
- geo-location (where the blogger is posting from)
- geo-referencing (places mentioned in content)
- people names
- author’s tags
- trackbacks/pingbacks
- comment notification
- digital signatures & trust assertions
- media/attachment metadata
That’s not an exhaustive list, but you get the idea – much more pingwidth. All of this information is useful in some consumption context, and much more efficient if submitted with a ping rather than having to be discovered by URL dereferencing and crawling.
‘Pingwidth’. Wish I’d thought of that…
Well, people like Verisign are in a much better position to benefit from the new ping economics. All I am going to get is a footnote for coiing the term. Grumble.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (69) | Category: Technology
Posted by Stowe Boyd
I pinged Jason Fried of 37Signals about including Writeboards into Basecamp, and (d'uh) he told me they are already integrated.
[from Everything Basecamp: NEW FEATURE: Writeboards]
Last week we released a new product called Writeboard. Writeboard is a simple collaborative (or solo) text editor with simple revision history and change comparisons. It lets you write, share, revise, and compare. Writeboards are great for drafting and collaborating on text with clients or your own internal team.
We spent the week after launch integrating Writeboards into Basecamp. And now they're live. Look for the Writeboards tab in any project.
Free Basecamp accounts are allowed to create 2 Writeboards. Paying accounts (all levels) can create unlimited Writeboards.
Candidly, one of my surly, uncooperative partners (just kidding, Francois!) started to move us away from Basecamp -- which I had been using to manage everything at Corante -- because it lacked a collaborative document capability. We have been trying to use wikis instead (Jotspot).
I think that the inclusion of Writeboards may swing us back (I hope).
Comments (3)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Google has quietly enabled tags to My Search History, as reported by Inside Google.
I guess what I need is more like Del.icio.us functionality, though. The current mechanism does support bookmarking and tagging of Google search results, like this:
The tagging is ok, but using the mouse click of the star to denote bookmarking is kind of off. I would rather have a more obvious "bookmark" text field to click on, or an icon that looks like a bookmark. The editing in place is interesting, but obviously Ajax hasn't been used throughout, because there are various points when screen refresh takes place.
Most obviously missing: integration with groups or the public. I want to share my bookmarks, and search is destined to be a shared space. Integration with Google contacts and groups should be next. And I need a bookmarklet so I can bookmark random locations, not just those I have found through Google. Is that hiding somewhere that I can't see?
Comments (2)
+ TrackBacks (1) | Category: Technology
October 13, 2005
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Eric Cogan informed me that Meebo, the web-based multi-headed IM client now supports Jabber and Gtalk, along with AIM, MSN, and Yahoo.
Comments (4)
+ TrackBacks (79) | Category: Technology
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Big (long rumored) announcement from Apple's Steve Jobs on the Video iPod: an experiment with big impact:
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (3) | Category: Technology
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Got an email from Peter Frietag, alerting me to SwagRoll, which is a neat-looking service that allows to accumulate directories of stuff -- books, music, DVDs, kitchen junk -- that we own or want to own.
I created an account, and the whole thing, including tagging entries, is amazingly easy. Looks like their aren't many users yet, so the whole social side -- meeting people with similar taste in movies, for example -- is only implied at the moment.
I would like one of these gear-ownership sites to provide a way for people to actually indicate that they are buying something from your wishlist. Last year I had three people by me the same CD, since it was first on my Amazon wishlist.
Also, it appears that the developers of Swagroll want us to use tags: tisk, tisk, indeed:
I am not certain that there is enough there for me to undertake the work involved at Swagroll. Why can't they capture my iTunes directory, and what I have rented trhough NetFlix, to prepopulate my world?
[By the way, I am starting a tagspace called Get Real Apps 2.0 to denote all the reviews of Web 2.0 Apps. ]
Comments (7)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
October 12, 2005
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Media
Posted by Stowe Boyd
In a move that was certainly not anticipated, Microsoft and Yahoo have announced
an agreement to connect users of Yahoo Messenger and MSN Messenger.
My take -- prior to talking to any of the players -- is that this is an effort to counter the presence of AIM, the established leader in the space, and the threat posed by Google, whose Gtalk solution was only recently announced. [Update: oh, and Skype! I was running out the door when I wrote the earlier paragraphs.]
I personally have given up on IMing by MSN or Yahoo, so if I am any indicator, this will be a good idea: once they interoperate, I might be willing to put one of them back on my desktop, although both companies are in the hall of shame for their policies regarding Macintosh.
Comments (8)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology
Posted by Stowe Boyd
In response to my recent comments about ping economics at Verisign:
Slowing down “ping cycles” or otherwise degrading the performance of the service isn’t appealing to me at all. The goal is for all pings to circulate through the system quickly and accurately. Rather than thinking about changes in latency or timing, I’m thinking the “value-add” here will pivot around the depth or richness of the ping itself.
For example: if a blog submits a “full content ping” – a ping that is much more than just the URL notification of new post, but the full content of the post itself, the infrastructure layer, either as an extension of the ping server itself, or perhaps in conjunction with a partner, can skip the URL dereferencing and crawling process, provided it establishes nominal trust with the submitter. So, if the whole post is attached with the ping – including really useful metadata like that addressed in the Atom 1.0 spec – the post can be processed and indexed, and therefore surfaced to the user much more quickly, and cost effectively than the “basic ping”.
On the outbound side, if a service is offered that not only provides ping signals, but attaches a rich set of metadata along with it – tags, keywords, place names, geo-references, etc. – that would be a highly useful upgrade from the information provided right now, which is basically a title and a URL for the source content. That may be an area where service and application builders will find a fee for developing and delivering the needed metadata on pinged content is easily worth the fee charged by the service.
So, think about pings becoming more deep and rich as a way to add value that can be charged for, rather than “dumbing down”, or “slowing down” the existing basic pings so that what is now considered a basic ping can be monetized as a “premium”. That’s not what I'm talking about at all. That’s bad mojo, IMHO.
I agree. It is very bad mojo. But we still are going to wind up with a 'pro' version -- for extra cash -- with all the fancy bells and whistles (geolocation, etc.) and more 'pingwidth' than the basic stuff. (Yes, I did say 'pingwidth'. You heard it here first.)
|