Corante

Quote
"I can’t think of anything that demonstrates the sovereign nature of the self better than a blog.” - Doc Searls
About the Author
stowegold150x150.jpg
Stowe Boyd is a well-known media subversive, and an internationally recognized authority on real-time, collaborative and social technologies. His new blog is Message.
In the Boston area?: Join us on June 11 for Startups and the Cloud, a free event on cloud computing with insights from Intuit founder Scott Cook and others

Get Real

« Web 2.0 Workgroup | Main | Dan Gillmor on Center for Citizen Media »

December 21, 2005

Traitors in our Midst: Web 2.0 Antihype

Email This Entry

Posted by Stowe Boyd

Michael calls Dave Winer, Richard McManus and Russell Shaw traitors for coming out against the concept of Web 2.0, although he moderates that with a smiley:

[from CrunchNotes � Traitors in our Midst]

Web 2.0 is not a marketing slogan. It is the slogan of a people’s army. Our army. They are words that help us explain the explosion of conversations on the web, and justify our enthusiasm for innovation. Web 2.0 is why I came back from my exodus at the fringes of technology, to explore the frontier of the new consumer web.

What did these "traitors" say?

Russell Shaw [not a member of the workgroup] seems to have been the initial source of this Web 2.0 backlash. He argues that Web 2.0 doesn't exist:

[from � Web 2.0? It doesn't exist | IP Telephony, VoIP, Broadband | ZDNet.com

The problem I have with this "Web 2.0" slogan is that it is a contrivance, meant to imply a unified movement or wave toward a better Web. Just the very numbering of the thing brings out my moo-goo detector: 1.0 sounds like a beginning. 2.0 (as opposed to a tenth-decimal, such as 1.7 or a 2.4 implies - by its very roundness, a coordinated, standards-based, like-minded rebirth, reconstruction, renaissance, resurrection, whatever you want to call it. 2.0 is the ideal number for such an impression: it implies a concerted, noble effort at refreshing an inspired, but now aging, creation. even "3.0" implies, well, we didn't get it right the first time, 2.0 was transitory and is getting long in the tooth, so here we are transitioning to 3.0. But 2.0 sounds good.

Well, Web 2.0 is bunk. Not that the elements of this rebirth aren't there. I write about some of them, and Richard has them nailed. It's just that they cannot be classified under a common umbrella. They are forward lurches of various standards and technologies, some compatible, some not. Some revolutionary, some evolutionary, some impractical. Some are collaborative, others are highly competitive with each other.

Baloney. Web 2.0 has become widely used as an indicator that something different is going on with recent innovations on the web. It is being adopted by a wide range of people, including marketing weasels and earnest technologists, each of whom have their own reasons for adopting the term.

Russell looks to a Wikipedia definition for the term as justification for the notion that it was created by marketing propagandists to advance their evil goals: specifically, to create a series of profitable conferences, by which I guess he means John Battelle and Medialive, the folks behind the Web 2.0 conference. Wikipedia as a proof of something? Come on.

Appending a "2.0" to a term does not imply -- at least to me -- that some sort of consensus has been reached about the meaning of the term, or even less that its based on some colleciton of standards. It originally meant a new rev of a product, which implies a redesign and the rollout of new features. And "2.0" has become a useful suffix (like "gate" in the political sphere) to indicate a revolution, where the mistakes and bad design choices of an initial release are fixed, or at least countered. Media products -- such as Business 2.0 and Release 2.0 -- have fixed that notion into the zeitgeist. And Web 2.0 is so widely used that ascribing it to Battelle & Co. is really silly.

But their is a movement, of sorts, toward a different model of web-based applications, and Russell's dissmissive comments are simply wrong.

The treason begins with Dave Winer, who lauds Russell's antihype:

[He's exactly right, and what he says is kind of obvious.

Web 2.0 is a way for certain marketing people to claim they invented stuff that they didn't invent, without actually claiming they invented it. It's the kind of double-talk marketing guys love.

In a sense people are right when they say it's another bubble. It's dishonest like the bubble was. Yet the technologies they're hyping are honest.

Yeah, we're getting fleeced again. It sucks.

And Richard McManus jumps in with both feet, saying that Russell is 100% correct, and more or less promising to never say the W word again:

I've had enough of the hype. I've had enough of cynicism. I've had enough of hate blogs. The nail in the coffin was this post on ZDNet, by Russell Shaw. The thing is, I agree with Russell. The term 'Web 2.0' is distracting from the real value going on in the Web right now.

Read/WriteWeb will be focusing on more media-related web technology in 2006. Enough Web 2.0.

Yikes. My experience -- particularly talking with innovators in the past few months for the upcoming New Visionaries video series (see The New Visionaries: Rebooting The Web) -- has led to the exact opposite insight: there is a new sensibility about web applications -- how they are conceived, designed, built, marketed and sold -- that in aggregate is truly different that what preceded it. Note that Dave at least concedes that the technologies being "hyped" are honest, which means that maybe the technologists are too? Maybe it's just those evil marketing guys again.

This antihype is directed, implicitly, against the advocacy for Web 2.0 by people like, well, me, as well as more well-known figure like John Battelle (I wrote about his recent op-ed piece in the New York Times, Building A Better Boom), and Tim O'Reilly (see Web 2.0: Compact Definition).

I am not prepared to pen a magisterial debunking of the Web 2.0 antihype that is growing, but I am committed to chip away at it, day by day. Here's a few observations as to why Web 2.0 is real:

  • Web 1.0, and its bubble, have come and gone. Many of the innovators in Web 2.0 are young folks who either observed the Bubble from afar or as newly minted hirelings in Web 1.0 companies. Their aspirations and thinking have been strongly influenced by the debacle. As I recently wrote, about the frugality of Web 2.0 companies, a real shift from Bubble excesses:
    I was just on a tour, talking with a handful of Web 2.0 tech start-up founders, and the tendency is to stay small, almost humorously small. At Mary Hodder's Bloqx, for example, three developers were crammed into a room no larger than a large closet. Jason Fried of 37 Signals advocates keeping teams small, not just from a desire to reduce the burn, but to increase the likelihood of less features creeping into products. This week, I saw the same reflected in the jampacked three-room office of Podcast.com, where Scott Beatty, the CEO, described the company's plans to the 'rolling beta' model of developing more and more rich services, which rely on small, agile development coupled with an obsession with end-user experience.

    It's an austere and highly philosophical era -- which John only tangentially touches on -- but one that is likely to lead to very different outcomes that Web 1.0. I believe that it's also a generational thing. These are either young veterans of the Web 1.0 mess, or those that witnessed the fall out of "irrational exuberance" from afar. And they are at least going to make new mistakes, if mistakes are to be made.


  • While by no means universal, and by no means a standard, there are general principles that reappear over and over again in discussions with Web 2.0 application developers. I recently referred to these as "central tendencies":
    • Users First -- The user experience is a proxy for the user, and all of the folks I touched base with so far agree that user experience is the pivot point of everything. That means that the norms of human expectations, social interaction, and interface goals become the central motif of these apps. For example, sharing with others becomes a basic principle, not something tacked on later.

    • Build from personal need -- In every case, these visionaries have decided to build something because they wanted to exist for their own personal use.

    • Build small, fast, and iteratively -- The nature of Web 2.0 app frameworks, and why they have evolved, is to support a extremely agile development mantra. But across the board, I have seen very small teams building the core functionality of some potentially larger product, and rolling it out to real users to see how it works. And then respond to feedback, and roll out the next version. This is not just a technique for the initial development stage of these products: its here forever.

    • Build small, focused apps, that could serve as building blocks in larger assemblages -- All these folks are resisting the tempation to bloat apps with more and more features, opting instead to build small, highly focused apps that could be integrated (though APIs) into larger assemblages (mash-ups).

As the world speeds up, the gap between any action and it's inevitable reaction seems to have closed, almost to nothingness. Ideas that have promise, technologies with the power to change the world, products that offer productivity boost, almost anything new -- and therefore threatening -- attracts nay-sayers just as quickly as adherents. The antihype almost arrives before the promise of the innovation can even be experienced by the early adopters. The Spanish have a saying, "May no new thing arise," that suggests the comfort that comes from resisting innovation, or the promise of change. Thomas Kuhn, in The Structure of Scientific Revolutions observed that those in established roles in a scientific community will resist new paradigms that emerge -- even if they better explain dispartities in observed reality -- because it threatens the cultural and social foundations of the community, and the established scientists' roles within it.

I don't think Russell, Dave, and Richard are evil, just because they aren't swayed by the observations of Battelle, O'Reilly, or me. But I think they are missing the opportunity to learn what the new visionaries out there think, those that do believe they are onto something different, building something different, onto a different era. And the A-Listers of the preceding era may find their influence waning in this new era, especially if they don't perceive the things that make it new.

Comments (13) + TrackBacks (4) | Category: Technology


COMMENTS

1. Ken Yarmosh on December 21, 2005 02:14 PM writes...

Stowe, good points. I agree with the idea that "Web 2.0" does not represent a specific set of standards and I've harped on not trying to define it. It does represent a movement and the fact that the web is changing.

More importantly, the term "Web 2.0" is here to stay, for better or for worse. I'm not sure I see the value in coming up with some other phrase or way to articulate this idea.

Perhaps a topic of discussion during our January Web 2.0 Meetup?

Permalink to Comment

2. Richard MacManus on December 21, 2005 02:52 PM writes...

Just to be clear, I've been hyping Web 2.0 for over a year. I was the first blogger to focus on it, by a long way, and I contributed to a lot of the early definitions. Indeed it's fair to say the popularity of my blog has been built on Web 2.0.

But what I'm saying now is that the term has become too overblown and nebulous - and is holding us all back. We're too focused on debating its meaning and fighting off the cynics, to make real progress with the actual technologies.

I will continue to write about the technologies and impact of this current era of the Web, but I'll be avoiding the use of the Web 2.0 moniker *in my writings* (I can't and don't want to change what my blogs are called).

Permalink to Comment

3. Stowe BOyd on December 22, 2005 10:17 AM writes...

Richard - Ok. I will stop niddling on you, although I still plan to persevere in the whole "what is web 2.0" meme until I get it straight.

Ken - By all means!

Permalink to Comment

4. Shane Ede on December 22, 2005 12:17 PM writes...

I couldn't agree more. I postes something along the same lines on http://www.thatedeguy.com/archives/2005/12/there-is-no-spoon

Permalink to Comment

5. Matthew Gertner on December 22, 2005 02:21 PM writes...

I fervently agreed with you but my trackback (http://www.allpeers.com/blog/2005/12/22/chipping-away-at-web-20-antihype/) didn't show up.

Permalink to Comment

6. Amy Gahran on December 27, 2005 10:19 PM writes...

Hi, Stowe

I do think the "Web 2.0" movement is mostly hype, but not all hype is useless or baseless. I wrote more about this today in Contentious:
- http://snipurl.com/l3mr

Personally, I find it amusing that the proponents of Web 2.0 -- a concept which embraces the idea of the "perpetual beta" -- would pick a buzzword that directly connotes a traditional software release.

Ah, the joys of language :-)

- Amy Gahran
Editor, Contentious

Permalink to Comment

7. Adam Weinroth on December 29, 2005 02:40 PM writes...

Stowe, excellent analysis of what Web 2.0 is at it's core. I do hate the term (especially as per Amy G's comment), but it is the accepted label for something that is distinct, even if tough to define.

The antihype, in my view, is a reaction to frivolity (on the part of application developers and investors/acquirers). The 2nd recurring Web 2.0 characteristic you listed is one that I hold dear - unfortunately though, much of the new stuff hitting the screen is based on the personal need to build a so-called Web 2.0 app and/or potentially make a quick buck. To me it feels like the antihype is against the hype, not the lingo. For more on what I am calling "doubtcasting", see this post: http://adam.easyjournal.com/entry.aspx?eid=2787095

All the best,
Adam Weinroth

Permalink to Comment

8. Doug on January 5, 2006 04:44 AM writes...

Eskimos agree, Ice 2.0 provides a rich user experience.

Permalink to Comment

9. sexy girls on March 25, 2006 09:48 PM writes...

swimsuit babes spanish babes blondes blacks videos sexy blondes latina lesbos latina nude big black cocks free black porn adult entertainment world sex guide incest toons incest stories free gay penis free gay sex free porn movies free porn movies cheerleaders naked cheerleaders on cheerleaders undress amateur girl busty amateurs female domination stories sock fetish fat asses body fat calculator free shit eating pics scat stories amateur upskirt candid upskirts brunette lesbians cute brunette pornstar blowjobs straight male porn stars lesbian lovers ebony lesbians toon porn pictures free gay cartoons sonic the hedgehog hentai free hentai porn dog dick in pussy boy dick anal close ups clitoris close up young ass sexy ass virgin pussy free black pussy fist fuck fat fuck nude web cams web cam sex cum pussy cum in her mouth nude sports nude little girls blonde hardcore sex sex hardcore pornography anal black anal masturbation hairy redhead pussy mature redhead animal sex pics free sex with animals amateur blowjobs blowjob video clips free samples free pantyhose pictures pantyhose sex free anime porn free porn pics shaved lips shaved asian adult video games sublime directory adult links gilmore girls spice girls large tits tit fuck tranny pictures tranny pictures ass rape forced sex bikini hottest girls angelina jolie in bikini thong models hot models in swimsuits asian teens teen porn marilyn monroe pictures halle berry pictures paris hilton sex video free sex videos mature models free granny sex women of wrestling nude simple nude women free porn videos sample milf hunter videos free group sex gallery gangbang squad hot naked women avril lavigne naked free asian porn asian exotic models celeb nude free nude celebrity free female masturbation videos young masturbation free pissing pictures golden shower interracial swingers interracial porn young girls

Permalink to Comment

10. sexy girls on March 25, 2006 09:48 PM writes...

swimsuit babes spanish babes blondes blacks videos sexy blondes latina lesbos latina nude big black cocks free black porn adult entertainment world sex guide incest toons incest stories free gay penis free gay sex free porn movies free porn movies cheerleaders naked cheerleaders on cheerleaders undress amateur girl busty amateurs female domination stories sock fetish fat asses body fat calculator free shit eating pics scat stories amateur upskirt candid upskirts brunette lesbians cute brunette pornstar blowjobs straight male porn stars lesbian lovers ebony lesbians toon porn pictures free gay cartoons sonic the hedgehog hentai free hentai porn dog dick in pussy boy dick anal close ups clitoris close up young ass sexy ass virgin pussy free black pussy fist fuck fat fuck nude web cams web cam sex cum pussy cum in her mouth nude sports nude little girls blonde hardcore sex sex hardcore pornography anal black anal masturbation hairy redhead pussy mature redhead animal sex pics free sex with animals amateur blowjobs blowjob video clips free samples free pantyhose pictures pantyhose sex free anime porn free porn pics shaved lips shaved asian adult video games sublime directory adult links gilmore girls spice girls large tits tit fuck tranny pictures tranny pictures ass rape forced sex bikini hottest girls angelina jolie in bikini thong models hot models in swimsuits asian teens teen porn marilyn monroe pictures halle berry pictures paris hilton sex video free sex videos mature models free granny sex women of wrestling nude simple nude women free porn videos sample milf hunter videos free group sex gallery gangbang squad hot naked women avril lavigne naked free asian porn asian exotic models celeb nude free nude celebrity free female masturbation videos young masturbation free pissing pictures golden shower interracial swingers interracial porn young girls

Permalink to Comment

11. sexy girls on March 25, 2006 09:48 PM writes...

swimsuit babes spanish babes blondes blacks videos sexy blondes latina lesbos latina nude big black cocks free black porn adult entertainment world sex guide incest toons incest stories free gay penis free gay sex free porn movies free porn movies cheerleaders naked cheerleaders on cheerleaders undress amateur girl busty amateurs female domination stories sock fetish fat asses body fat calculator free shit eating pics scat stories amateur upskirt candid upskirts brunette lesbians cute brunette pornstar blowjobs straight male porn stars lesbian lovers ebony lesbians toon porn pictures free gay cartoons sonic the hedgehog hentai free hentai porn dog dick in pussy boy dick anal close ups clitoris close up young ass sexy ass virgin pussy free black pussy fist fuck fat fuck nude web cams web cam sex cum pussy cum in her mouth nude sports nude little girls blonde hardcore sex sex hardcore pornography anal black anal masturbation hairy redhead pussy mature redhead animal sex pics free sex with animals amateur blowjobs blowjob video clips free samples free pantyhose pictures pantyhose sex free anime porn free porn pics shaved lips shaved asian adult video games sublime directory adult links gilmore girls spice girls large tits tit fuck tranny pictures tranny pictures ass rape forced sex bikini hottest girls angelina jolie in bikini thong models hot models in swimsuits asian teens teen porn marilyn monroe pictures halle berry pictures paris hilton sex video free sex videos mature models free granny sex women of wrestling nude simple nude women free porn videos sample milf hunter videos free group sex gallery gangbang squad hot naked women avril lavigne naked free asian porn asian exotic models celeb nude free nude celebrity free female masturbation videos young masturbation free pissing pictures golden shower interracial swingers interracial porn young girls

Permalink to Comment

12. latina babes on March 27, 2006 04:55 AM writes...

dog dicks in women ebony woman teen movie teen sex stories volleyball babes babes in miniskirts fuck comics black fuck toon porn pictures adult cartoon close ups shaved pussy shaved men nude gymnasts shana hiatt nude blonde girl gallery hot blondes free rape galleries free forced sex celebrities nude wwe divas nude trannys teen shemale brunette boobs brunette orgasm young female models female model portfolios wet vagina pamela anderson pussy college amateur girls amateur sex video free movies free interracial fucking movie artwork interracial couples fat belly low fat diet mega cock cravers big black cocks sex with dogs dog sex how to have sex sex movies pussy close up big natural breasts close up granny tgp sexy mature women oops upskirt candid upskirts fetish sex bondage gear redhead ass redhead babe free gay movies nude gay celebrities naked celebrities naked extreme male masturbation techniques masturbation technique porn asian gallery asian lesbos free pissing movies pee on you forced blowjob horse blowjobs cheerleaders striping in college free cheerleader galleries halle berry breast large breasts cum face female cum pussy ejaculations incest taboo forum incest stories hardcore gay hardcore porn jenna jameson movies britney spears fake lesbian hentai lesbian anal victoria secret girls uncensored girls shower cam girl cams bang bros collection bang bang hidden video cameras adult free video clip hentai rape dragon ball hentai gay shit shit movies free porn movies latina porn christina aguilera naked britney spears naked hitch movie blowjob movies latin porn latina babes nylon sex legs and stockings free porn star movies female porn stars free adult sex stories free adult chat bikini model bikini chick hairy ass britney spears ass anal fucking double anal black teens black girls in thongs russian babes

Permalink to Comment

13. latina babes on March 27, 2006 04:55 AM writes...

dog dicks in women ebony woman teen movie teen sex stories volleyball babes babes in miniskirts fuck comics black fuck toon porn pictures adult cartoon close ups shaved pussy shaved men nude gymnasts shana hiatt nude blonde girl gallery hot blondes free rape galleries free forced sex celebrities nude wwe divas nude trannys teen shemale brunette boobs brunette orgasm young female models female model portfolios wet vagina pamela anderson pussy college amateur girls amateur sex video free movies free interracial fucking movie artwork interracial couples fat belly low fat diet mega cock cravers big black cocks sex with dogs dog sex how to have sex sex movies pussy close up big natural breasts close up granny tgp sexy mature women oops upskirt candid upskirts fetish sex bondage gear redhead ass redhead babe free gay movies nude gay celebrities naked celebrities naked extreme male masturbation techniques masturbation technique porn asian gallery asian lesbos free pissing movies pee on you forced blowjob horse blowjobs cheerleaders striping in college free cheerleader galleries halle berry breast large breasts cum face female cum pussy ejaculations incest taboo forum incest stories hardcore gay hardcore porn jenna jameson movies britney spears fake lesbian hentai lesbian anal victoria secret girls uncensored girls shower cam girl cams bang bros collection bang bang hidden video cameras adult free video clip hentai rape dragon ball hentai gay shit shit movies free porn movies latina porn christina aguilera naked britney spears naked hitch movie blowjob movies latin porn latina babes nylon sex legs and stockings free porn star movies female porn stars free adult sex stories free adult chat bikini model bikini chick hairy ass britney spears ass anal fucking double anal black teens black girls in thongs russian babes

Permalink to Comment

TRACKBACKS

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Traitors in our Midst: Web 2.0 Antihype:

... [Read More]

Tracked on December 22, 2005 02:39 PM

Building a better web from Preoccupations
I've said this before, but, egad, why the hell are we discouraging people who are building tools - good or bad, useful or useless, on the right track or off base - because everything that is happening right now is [Read More]

Tracked on December 22, 2005 06:21 PM

Grab bag: Web 2.0 from Marketing Roadmaps
As many of you know, I am confused about this Web 2.0 thing. I get that the Internet is evolving and social media have really changed the landscape, but do we really need a version number ? Here are some [Read More]

Tracked on December 27, 2005 07:28 PM

Web 2.0: a label for "now" from Virtuous cycle
Inevitably, my article "How do you make money on Web2.0?" gathered the following comment by SidewalkPilot on digg: What does WEB2.0 mean, and why are there no spaces? I use the term merely as a shortcut for saying "the new internet companies", in... [Read More]

Tracked on January 8, 2006 02:59 PM


EMAIL THIS ENTRY TO A FRIEND

Email this entry to:

Your email address:

Message (optional):




RELATED ENTRIES
Reminder -- /Message
/Message - A New Blog
The Individual Is The New Group -- Part 1
1000 Tags: Tag Advertising
Social Ethics And Technology Design
Nancy Hass on In Your Facebook.com
Black and White and Dead All Over: Is Newsprint Dead?
Anonymous Trolls, Beware: You Are Breaking Federal Laws