Lucy on Reminder -- /Message
Janna on The Week Ahead
Elaine on Reminder -- /Message
Elaine on The Week Ahead
omaha hold em on Mary Jo Foley on Microsoft Needs To Say No To Web 2.0
morgan on John Cass on Nokia N90 Blogger Campaign
bobbie on Corante 2.0: Hubs In A Network Of Stars
tim on Get Real Minute 29 Nov 2005
penis enlargement: penis enlargement
online backgammon: online backgammon
Upskirt: Upskirt
Hot Teens: Hot Teens
from Jhony: :-)
from Jhony: :-)
poker online: poker online
from Jhony: :-)
from Jhony: :-)
from Jhony: :-)
Good piece at Wired by Gary Wolf making the parallel between the Dean emergent democracy network and Isenberg's "Stupid Networks" concept.
Make the network stupid.[pointer from David Weinberger.]The Dean campaign is a network rather than an army, and that is one of its strengths. But it's a stupid network, and that's also a strength. Stupid is meant in the technical sense, defined by David Isenberg in his classic telephony paper, "The Rise of the Stupid Network." Isenberg advanced the principle that under conditions of uncertainty, a network should not be optimized for any set of uses presumed to be definitive. Instead, the network should be as simple as possible, with advanced functionality and intelligence moved out to its edges. For the Dean campaign, this means that hundreds of independent groups are organizing with very little direction from headquarters.
Dean's network may not be globally optimized toward getting him into office: there are likely to be hundreds or thousands of locally optimized purposes that partitions of the network dream up.
I agree with you!!!
but in my point of view this stupid network has been generated by his supporters ... Dean is very strategic and he's taking profit from this situation
The Stupid Network is a great paper, I've referenced/shared it a lot since '97.
John/jheuristic
Permalink to CommentHi -
Is there a reason why we can not cut 'n' paste at this site?
-jtm