Lucy on Reminder -- /Message
Janna on The Week Ahead
Elaine on Reminder -- /Message
Elaine on The Week Ahead
omaha hold em on Mary Jo Foley on Microsoft Needs To Say No To Web 2.0
morgan on John Cass on Nokia N90 Blogger Campaign
bobbie on Corante 2.0: Hubs In A Network Of Stars
tim on Get Real Minute 29 Nov 2005
penis enlargement: penis enlargement
online backgammon: online backgammon
Upskirt: Upskirt
Hot Teens: Hot Teens
from Jhony: :-)
from Jhony: :-)
poker online: poker online
from Jhony: :-)
from Jhony: :-)
from Jhony: :-)
A question from Derek Lomas, regarding the impact of a recent court case, where US District Court Judge Steven D. Merryday ruled that aggregation of web content may not be blocked -- in all cases -- by copyright (see Judge on Search: Copyright Doesn't Cover All Web Sites).
The case revolved around aggregation of boat information from a variety of copyrighted sites by Nautical Solutions, Inc., which presented this aggregation of information to prospective buyers of yachts. The judge argued that the presentation of factual information about the boats was lawful, and that the rights to the pictures and other information were really held by the yacht owners, not those hosting the web sites where the information was being presented.
So -- in response to Derek's question -- my sense is that information about individuals that is made accessible in various social networking and /or dating sites may be subject to the same interpretation.
This opens the door to possible spidering of social networking/dating sites for purposes analogous to those of Nautical Solutions in the boating world. What you are entering about your goals, desires, likes, and dislikes in business partners or soulmates may turn out to not be copyrightable -- it may simply be ruled to be "factual information" and not protected, as a result.