Lucy on Reminder -- /Message
Janna on The Week Ahead
Elaine on Reminder -- /Message
Elaine on The Week Ahead
omaha hold em on Mary Jo Foley on Microsoft Needs To Say No To Web 2.0
morgan on John Cass on Nokia N90 Blogger Campaign
bobbie on Corante 2.0: Hubs In A Network Of Stars
tim on Get Real Minute 29 Nov 2005
penis enlargement: penis enlargement
online backgammon: online backgammon
Upskirt: Upskirt
Hot Teens: Hot Teens
from Jhony: :-)
from Jhony: :-)
poker online: poker online
from Jhony: :-)
from Jhony: :-)
from Jhony: :-)
Thomas Claburn writes in InformationWeek about spim, and includes one of my thoughts about the paradoxical benefits of public IM network non-interoperability:
"Boyd also doubts that spim will ever wreak the havoc of spam. One reason is the fragmented nature of the IM networks--an AOL IM user can't talk with an MSN Messenger or Yahoo IM user. That's been a criticism of IM, but it's likely to inhibit the growth of spim. "Because the major instant-messaging networks have not worked toward any kind of public interoperability structure," he says, "it's extremely difficult to create a uniform mechanism to spim on all the networks."
But it's not impossible. Those running the IM networks are discussing greater interoperability. That could be just the incentive spimmers need."
Tracked on January 22, 2004 02:45 AM