Quote
"I can’t think of anything that demonstrates the sovereign nature of the self better than a blog.” - Doc Searls
About the Author
Stowe Boyd is a well-known media subversive,
and an internationally recognized authority on real-time, collaborative
and social technologies. His new blog is Message.
|

Category Archives
«
Technology |
Telecommunications
January 10, 2006
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Comments (11)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Telecommunications
December 15, 2005
Posted by Stowe Boyd
I am in transit, in Boston, so I haven't had a chance to talk to any other folks involved in this effort, but I will do so next week, but I got a pointer to this info from Peter Saint-Andre emailed the link to me:
[from Jabber Press]
The Jabber Software Foundation (JSF) today published initial documentation of Jingle, a set of extensions to the IETF's Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP) for use in voice over IP (VoIP), video, and other peer-to-peer multimedia sessions. The Jingle technology represents an open version of the protocols used in the popular Google Talk application released in August 2005, and Google is supporting the standardization and evolution of these protocols through the JSF's community standards process. The specifications published today are:
- JEP-0166: Jingle Signalling -- The core technology for peer-to-peer session management, which enables communication through existing firewalls and can be extended to support a wide range of session types. (Authored by Scott Ludwig and Joe Beda of Google, Peter Saint-Andre of the JSF, and Joe Hildebrand of Jabber Inc.)
- JEP-0167: Jingle Audio -- The session description format for Jingle audio sessions, enabling seamless one-to-one voice over IP (VoIP) between Jabber/XMPP users. (Authored by Scott Ludwig of Google and Peter Saint-Andre of the JSF.)
Follow-on specifications will be published in the near future for additional session types (e.g., video) as well as to document interoperability with the IETF's Session Initiation Protocol (SIP), the ITU's H.323 technology, and the IAX protocol used natively in the popular Asterisk open-source PBX application.
Comments (0)
| Category: Telecommunications
December 07, 2005
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Yahoo asked me to come out to Palo Alto Monday, and get briefed on their planned phone service, integrated with Yahoo Messenger. I got the chance to meet Jeff Bonforte, newly dubbed as senior director of voice product management for Yahoo, formerly of SIPphone (the folks developing the Gizmo Project -- the open source alternative to Skype).
I listened to the product roadmap, and was unsurprised: they are definitely focused on kicking Skype, hard. The long term ("Voice 2.0") is about voice integration across the board in Yahoo. We'll see how that plays out. I think Yahoo has a real chance to displace Skype as the VoIP darling, given the number of Yahoo users out there.
Personally, I'd like to see more attention to the audio and video podcasting side of things. Or stated differently, I would like to see more attention to recording voice and video from desktop and handheld devices, and editing/publishing that.
Of course, high quality audio and video is critical, but publishing it is just as important -- at least to me.
[On a media sidenote: this story was supposed to be embargoed until Thusday, but Newsweek and others broke it early. So those of us thay played nice with the story got scooped!]
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Telecommunications
November 29, 2005
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Not too long ago, I threw a hissy fit here, about my wonderful Sony Ericsson S710a phone (see Why I Hate Sony Ericsson And Cingular).
The issue was my inability to get the phone connecting to the Web as advertised; in particular, I wanted to get the phone to work as a modem, as I had been able to do with an earlier Sony Ericsson phone. This was truly a life saver on many occasions when no other approach would work, like on the train to NYC. And the coolest thing was that it worked through Bluetooth, so no cables were required.
Well... it seems like the squeaky wheel gets the grease, becuase I was contacted by Michael Drenchen, a diligent employee of Cingular, who happened upon my screed and then proceeded to straighten my mess out.
Turns out that buried in the bowels of my profile at Cingular was the identity of my old phone, but not the new one. When I bought the new phone (from eBay, to save a few hundred bucks) the folks at the local Cingular store said that all I needed to do was swap the SIM chip -- which made it work as a phone, but apparently you need to actually inform the network software about the phone's identity to get things like email and net access to work.
Comments (15)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Telecommunications
November 11, 2005
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Susan channels Fred Wilson, who distills the future of media:
[from Susan Mernit - Quote of the Day 2]
Here is the future of media:
1 - Microchunk it - Reduce the content to its simplest form. Thanks Umair.
2 - Free it - Put it out there without walls around it or strings on it. Thanks Stewart.
3 - Syndicate it - Let anyone take it and run with it. Thanks Dave.
4 - Monetize it - Put the monetization and tracking systems into the microchunk. Thanks Feedburner.
I wish I were there, now.
Comments (7)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Telecommunications
October 29, 2005
Posted by Stowe Boyd
I think it is amazingly prescient that the folks at Nokia are going to start sending me new model cell phones to review, starting next month. There must have been a disturbance in the Van Allen Belt or something, because just before they contacted me, I had resolved to post a long and bitchy post about my most recent phone, a Sony Ericsson S710a.
I love the engineering of this phone. It looks great. It takes great pictures (except for the truly stupid shutter sound that cannot be turned off, although there are three more or less aggrevating versions of the shuttle sound -- I particularly hated this feature when shooting pictures at a school play featuring my younger son, recently) and that makes up for some of the negatives, but my problems with connectivity suggest a complete breakdown in product management by Sony Ericsson and Cingular, my carrier.
This is touted as an EDGE capable phone, and I am being charged the monthly fees that would -- in principle -- allow me to use the phone for email, web access, and so on, at EDGE speeds. And, of course. I would like to be able to use the phone as a modem, as I did with its predecessor, a Sony Erricsson T367. But all of that has been a failure, for months.
Yes, the bluetooth connectivity to and from my Mac works, as it did for the T367, so I am able to move photos and other stuff (like phone call recordings!) relatively easily fromt he phone. But theconnectivity stuiff just can't get set up. Why? It looks like Cingular caan't be bothered to figure out how its offerings actually work with the phones they are selling us.
Once you buy this phone from Cingular you have to go to the Sony Ericsson website to download the settings for email, for example. In my case -- perhaps because my phone number was ported from another carrier? -- I was being sent settings for SBC instead of Cingular. These did not work. And in the case of the EDGE settings, the Cingular people at my local store did not have the faintest idea how I should proceed, aside from directing me to call their tech support staff. I tried to call several times, but the wait was always too long for me. A tech support email to Sony Ericsson received a quick response, however, but directed me to a third party hobbyist's Mac modem settings, and two+ screenfulls of directions about what I needed to do to manually set my phone up. A close reading of that hobbyist's site suggests that I would have to do even more to get anything like EDGE speeds, though. I have yet to undertake that, partly because I would still need to garner necessary infromation from Cingular to make it work. I bet this would take several days of my time. Really. Look at the instructions:
[via email]
Dear Stowe Boyd,
Thank you for contacting Sony Ericsson Online Support.
The phone can support EDGE, however we do not supply the EDGE service. If you require certain scripts to access the EDGE network, you will need to download them.
If you are unable to access your email, by using the over the air configuration tool, you may need to contact your service provider to obtain the manuel email settings for your phone.
I have included the instructions below for inputting them into your phone.
If you are unable to set-up your e-mail using the OTA (Over the Air) configurator on www.sonyericsson.com or through your service provider, you can manually configure using the instructions below.
BEFORE YOU BEGIN, PLEASE MAKE SURE THAT YOU HAVE THE FOLLOWING:
- Internet account (A simple way of setting up an Internet account is to ask your service provider to send you a message that contains the required information to create an account automatically on your mobile phone)
- If you don·t have a Data account configured in your phone, please see the section, set-up a data connection, below. The additional settings needed from your service provider are listed in the section
- Service Provider/E-mail provider specific settings. Please see the section, Set-up E-mail, below
- Verify your ISP account offers POP3 or IMAP4 access.
DATA ACCOUNT AND EMAIL
Before you begin configuring e-mail, you need to have a data account. You can have several data accounts saved in your phone, with different settings for different purposes (for example, one for WAP and one for email). If you already have a data account in your phone, please go to the section, Set up email. If you don·t have a data account in your phone, please follow the instructions below.
SET-UP A DATA CONNECTION:
When manually setting up a Data Connection, you will need the following information from your ISP or GPRS provider:
- One of the following
* APN (Access Point Name) · For a GPRS / EDGE connection
* Access Phone Number · For a GSM connection
- User ID · The user name you use to connect to your account with the provider.
- User Password · The password you use to connect to your account with the provider.
1. [CONNECT] > [DATA COM] or [DATA COMMUNICATION] > [DATA ACCOUNTS] > [NEW ACCOUNT]
2. Highlight [EDGE DATA] or [GSM DATA], press "Select"
3. Enter the name that you want to associate with this connection and press "Continue"
4. Highlight the [APN] field (for a GPRS connection) or the [PHONE NO.] field (for a GSM connection), then press "Edit"; then fill in the information from your provider and press "OK".
5. Highlight [USER NAME], press "Edit"; then fill in the your User ID and press "OK".
6. Highlight [PASSWORD], press "Edit"; then fill in the your password and press "OK".
7. Press "Save" to complete your data connection set up.
NOTE: You can create and store several data connections in your phone.
FOR GPRS DATA CONNECTIONS ONLY:
1. Highlight the account you just created and press "Edit"
2. Select IP Address and enter the IP address for the gateway, "Save".
SET-UP E-MAIL:
Please contact your service provider or e-mail provider for the following settings:
- Incoming server address (POP3 server) and port · which identifies the computer where your incoming email messages are stored.
- Outgoing server address (SMTP server) and port· which identifies the computer through which your outgoing email messages are sent.
- Email address
- Email User name
- Email Password
1. [MESSAGES] > [EMAIL] > [SETTINGS]
2. Choose [NEW ACCOUNT], press "Add"
3. Enter a name for the email account, for example Home or Office, press "OK"
4. Choose [CONNECT USING]
5. Choose the data account that you created earlier to use with this email account
6. Choose [PROTOCOL] - POP 3 or IMAP 4. POP 3 is the most common.
7. Choose [INCOMING SERVER]. Enter the name or IP address of the service provider for incoming email messages.
8. Choose [INCOMING PORT]. If needed, change the port used by the protocol you are using.
9. Choose [ENCRYPTION] > [INCOMING SERVER] or [OUTGOING SERVER]; If you want encryption, you will be prompted for your domain.
10. Choose [MAILBOX]. Enter the username for your email account.
11. Choose [PASSWORD]. Enter a password for your email account. Your service provider will alternatively request a password on connection.
12. Choose [OUTGOING SERVER]. Enter the name or IP address of the SMTP server to be able to send email messages.
13. Choose [OUTGOING PORT]. If needed, change the port used by the SMTP protocol.
14. Choose [EMAIL ADDRESS]. Your Internet service provider supplies you with your email address.
15. Choose [DOWNLOAD]. Choose whether to receive [HEADERS & TEXT] or [HEADERS ONLY].
16. Choose [FROM NAME]. Enter your name. This will appear in outgoing email messages. This is not mandatory.
17. Choose [SIGNATURE]. Choose if you want to add a signature to your email messages. This is not mandatory.
18. Choose [COPY OUTGOING]. Choose [ON], if you want email messages sent from your phone to be sent to an additional email address of your choice. This way, your sent messages are copied and can be saved for future reference. This is not mandatory.
19. Choose [CHECK INTERVAL]. Choose how often you want the phone to connect to your email server and check for incoming email messages. This is not mandatory.
DEFAULT ACCOUNT:
If you have both an office and a home email account, you can set one of them as default.
1. [MESSAGES] > [EMAIL] > [SETTINGS]
2. Select the account that you want to use as default.
As part of Sony Ericsson's commitment to excellent customer service, we offer a wide variety of mobile products to suit your lifestyle. If you require more information, or have any other questions, please visit our website at http://www.sonyericsson.com or call us at 1-866-766-9374
Best regards,
Kim
Your Sony Ericsson Online Support Representative
Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications
So, I am baffled. Why build all these features into the phone and the service, if the product folks can't be bothered to make them work? If it is possible for some passionate amateur to get this to work, why doesn't Sony Ericsson, Cingular, or both, license his solution and/or his advice and make something that is installable, so that I could simply register for the service, and click 'ok' a few times?
Despite the fact that the phone has many good features, I am on the prowl again. Not for a better phone, per se, but one that balances features -- yes, I need the ability to record phone calls, and I will always want a good camera in my phone -- with product integration: I need the service and the phone features to actaully meet in the middle, not leave it up to me to hack it together. Either make it downloadable, or put it in the phone to begin with. I don't want to debug the phone, I just want it to do what's advertised. But I also lust for more fuctionality. I admit it. So here's my current wislist for the dream phone:
- 3Gish connectivity: I want to be able to connect to the web from my phone, both directly -- for IM, web browsing, email, or specialized apps -- or indirectly, as a modem for my Mac. And I would like it to be fast, please: as fast as possible.
- Camera - At least 1.5 M pixels, plus other features. Email photos, various lighting and special effect settings. A real lens system? The S710a has a light, which is cool and good for other purposes, too. I also like the video capability of the S701a, but its too time limited -- I really need at least 30 mins -- and the ability to use an external mic. Strangely, my phone supports speaker phone capabilities (necessary!) but no way to use that when videoing (or else it is always used, and there is no way to know).
Bluetooth -- Truly essential for syncing and connectivity. Don't want an additional cable so Bluetooth is critical, although I would be willing to accept a cable if it did other things, like USB charging of the phone, or firewire connectivity to camera/camcorder capabilities. Also, I would like my phone to be able to play nice with my Skype or other online VoIP accounts. So when the desktop VoIP tool 'rings' it would be directed to my cell phone, if I were in Bluetooth range. And, likevice, I would be able to call out on my cell phone, directed through the VoIP solution.
- Speaker phone - 'nuff said.
- Geopositioning -- Never have had it, but after using my wife's GPS unit, I want it. Also would like to have geolocation associated with metadata of other media: photo, video, and audio.
- PDA fetaures -- I make extensive use of the calendar and address book on my phone, in the obvious ways. I would like hyperlink there, so if I include a URL is an event, for example, I could click on it and open the phone browser pointing to a map, or a website, for example.
- iTunes -- Why the hell not? My phone is much bigger than a Nano, so it seems reasobably to only lug one gizmo around. Besides, I am not using the PDA extras on my iPod at all, so that's a waste. And now that there is a video iPod there will soon be a...
- Video iPod Phone -- All the above plus video. I like the idea of being able to not only watch video podcasts, or stream TV, but more importantly, to converse face-to-face through my phone with video just like I do through my Mac with iChat now. This is the killer feature: video phones at last!
I can dream, can't I?
Comments (20)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Telecommunications
September 19, 2005
Blink ›
Mobile Growth Not Slowing Yet
Infomatics has released some data on mobile phone growth for the year. Subscribers are set to jump from 335 million to 380 million this year - however, if we look at past trends, each year's "estimates" have been exceeded quite significantly, so I wouldn't be surprised to find the same going on here. Although many developed countries are nearing saturation, developing countries will push the growth, and we'll start to see more people around the world supporting 2 or more devices. Via Moore's Law
posted by Arieanna Foley |
|
# |
0 |
0
September 12, 2005
Posted by Arieanna Foley
The rumours were true. Skype has been sold... to eBay. At a $4.1 billion dollars, I think they've done pretty well with the sale. Probably better than anybody expected. About half of eBay's cash reserve has gone into the deal, according to Jeff Clavier.
It's an interesting acquisition, likely to cause some rumbles in the stock market and in the markets themselves for some time. Only time will tell what this pairing will truly mean, but some of the plans are already up front in the press release:
Skype, eBay and PayPal will create an unparalleled ecommerce and communications engine for buyers and sellers around the world.
“Communications is at the heart of ecommerce and community,” said Meg Whitman, President and Chief Executive Officer of eBay. “By combining the two leading ecommerce franchises, eBay and PayPal, with the leader in Internet voice communications, we will create an extraordinarily powerful environment for business on the Net.”...
Online shopping depends on a number of factors to function well. Communications, like payments and shipping, is a critical part of this process. Skype will streamline and improve communications between buyers and sellers as it is integrated into the eBay marketplace. Buyers will gain an easy way to talk to sellers quickly and get the information they need to buy, and sellers can more easily build relationships with customers and close sales. As a result, Skype can increase the velocity of trade on eBay, especially in categories that require more involved communications such as used cars, business and industrial equipment, and high-end collectibles.
The acquisition also enables eBay and Skype to pursue entirely new lines of business. For example, in addition to eBay’s current transaction-based fees, ecommerce communications could be monetized on a pay-per-call basis through Skype. Pay-per-call communications opens up new categories of ecommerce, especially for those sectors that depend on a lead-generation model such as personal and business services, travel, new cars, and real estate. eBay’s other shopping websites — Shopping.com, Rent.com, Marktplaats.nl and Kijiji – can also benefit from the integration of Skype. - Skype Press Release
The deal truly speaks volumes about markets and convergence. We've heard that "markets are conversations" from economists for ages, and eBay truly embodies this action between the actions of buyers and sellers. Skype is that platform for communications in real time, and brings true conversations to the market, where it will play out in everything from transactions to improved buyer relations to, as Ross Mayfield notes, identity.
From a user perspective, I hope that Skype turns around from the downward growth into positive numbers. That I receive no eBay spam or embedded ads. And that the product continues to evolve for the benefit of us users.
Technorati Tags: skype, ebay, acquisition, telephony, voip
Comments (3)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Telecommunications
September 08, 2005
Posted by Arieanna Foley
I just saw a rumour that eBay could be on the prowl to buy Skype. Bit of a business model shift, it would seem. The news comes out of the September 8th Wall Street Journal:
EBay Inc. is in talks to acquire Internet-telephony company Skype Technologies SA for $2 billion to $3 billion, according to people familiar with the matter, in a deal that would represent a dramatic shift in strategy for the world's largest online auction site.
The talks are in a sensitive stage and could fall apart, according to one person briefed on the matter. Luxembourg-based Skype, whose software allows consumers to make free telephone calls around the world using Internet technology, has been in active discussions with other technology companies, and none has led to a deal.
But the emergence of eBay as a suitor reveals a lot about the auction leader's growth prospects and strategy. While still dominating its field, eBay's core business is maturing, and the company is searching for new product categories and international markets. The company has made a steady string of acquisitions and investments over the last year and a half to enter markets such as rental-property listings, online classified-ad listings and comparison shopping.
Granted that its core business is maturing, I still don't see how VoIP fits into anything near a similar business strategy. From what the article notes, Skype is the only potential buy that is completely outside the eBay market - the others in shopping and classifieds at least fit the same business model.
So, this sounds like a crazy move on both parts. Don't you think?
News via Infectious Greed.
Technorati Tags: eBay, Skype, VoIP, Acquisition
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Telecommunications
September 06, 2005
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology | Telecommunications
August 24, 2005
Posted by Arieanna Foley
Skype looks like it has had a summer lull. The use of Skype has been growing all year, but from the minutes used per day, it looks like the average has been declining all summer. IS this a summer thing or competitive pressure? Hard to say. I would be worried - VoIP is on the upswing, so it's odd to see declining use in Skype.
Average minutes of use per day
* Jan - 28,954,133
* Feb - 37,533,906
* Mar - 41,745,885
* Apr - 41,732,959
* May - 39,451,552
* Jun - 38,479,729
* Jul - 35,754,556
Via Skype Journal and EuroTelcoblog
Comments (1)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Telecommunications
Posted by Stowe Boyd
I have played with Google Talk a bit more, since first getting onto it yesterday, including downloading the PC native client on Virtual PC. Given my laptop set-up today -- no head mike, not even my iSight -- on the road, working out of hotel room, it's hard to judge sound quality on the push-to-talk feature, but it is clear that this is meant to be a direct competitor of Skype, the upstart that has roiled the instant messaging world with its meteoric growth in the past year.
I was also surprised that Talk is not integrated into Google Desktop, at least not on the current released version. This is the future, however. The plug-in architecture they've developed should make that a snap. A little more ambitious to tightly integrate instant messsaging -- presence, for example -- into other apps, like gmail. And that would make the gmail solution competitive on the enterprise front with Microsoft and IBM offerings, although they do need to create a small client for offline email. management.
What about Talk capabilities integrated into Orkut, and Blogger? Many, many integration opportunities. Nerdvana is on the way?
Obviously, I expect to see video in Talk before you can catch a breath.
I am unhappy that Google has opted to not roll out a Google Desktop app for Mac , but at least with the iChat Jabber integration, I can ride the Google Talk wave a little. I hope the Apple and Google folks figure out how to make the cross-talk work... hey, wait. It might be working already, and I just don't know. more to follow.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology | Telecommunications
July 20, 2005
Posted by Stowe Boyd
I now run a bunch of instant messaging clients on my desktop, for a variety of boneheaded reasons:
- iChat - I am on the Mac, and iChat is really a cool way to interact with other Mac users, so long as they are likewise using iChat, that is. iChat also gateways to AIM and Jabber, so I use iChat as my client to talk to those worlds, but that can be less than optimal, since a number of the AIM and Jabber features don't work in iChat, or the other services don't support iChat style addresses. My handle is stoweboyd@mac.com, which various AIM services don't recognize as an AIM address, for example.
- I recently downloaded the Yahoo Messenger client, because I wanted some means to IM with Yahoo folks. I discovered that a/ the user interface is ugly, and b/ all the neato-cool features of the new Yahoo beta are not supported on Mac: that same old Windows-first approach of dissing all the Mac minority.
- I just have given up on Microsoft instant messaging solutions, primarily because of their antipathy for Mac. If they had ported Outlook to Mac, I probably would have stayed with it, since so many applications and services integrate with it (like Plaxo, for example), but I have made the jump over to Mail and iCal.
- I had tried to run various multiheaded instant messaging clients on the Mac, like Fire and Proteus, but they were maddening, so I have dropped them, at least until the time that someone comes up with a way to support more than just text interoperability. I really need audio and video.
- And then there is Skype. That has become the number two instant messaging solution for me, and often an IM chat in iChat becomes an audio call in Skype. I am considering swithching to Skype as my primary conduit, and most likely will do so when the video capability is debuted, later this year. There are several third party solutions, like vSkype and dialcom's spontania4IM, that support video, but they do not support Mac (Grrrr).
My pal, Stuary Henshall, who is perhaps the world's leading Skype head, sent me this message:

So I went to look at the Jyve Tools, and, yes, you guessed it, they only run on Windows. So I can't post the neato-cool chiclet on Get Real showing my Skype presence, as shown here.
The Apple folks ought to get with the big switch that is going on here, and make iChat integrate completely with Skype, or pay someone to build all these cool Skype related widgets for Mac. Because I think that Skype is building the kind of momentum and user base that could lead to a wholesale defection from the other services, and I for one am ready to quit.
Since Apple decided not to build a closed network of their own, nor to rely on the federated model of Jabber, they should licence Skype and build it into the next generation of iChat. Skype is already squarely in competition with Yahoo and Microsoft, given the strong push those companies are making toward VoIP in their instant messenging products, but Apple has seemingly let that battle go, choosing to not add VoIP into iChat.
So a tighter link with Apple is likely to be a good move for Skype, based on the principle that the enemy of my enemy is my friend. Especially when Mac comes out with iPod Phone (including video!) and squares off with Microsoft in the looming monster battle for the living room: the little black box that will control the family's internet-based entertainment. It's going to be Apple, with the killer iPod brand and partnered with Intel, versus Microsoft's Xbox and Windows solutions. Apple lacks various key pieces of the puzzle -- like a viable game platform, instant messaging plus VoIP, and a tivo solution -- but Jobs is likely lining those pieces up.
And, just as a side effect, one outcome of that battle is likely to be consolidation of the fragmented instant messaging world. If and when someone wins that battle I believe it will be like Betamax/VHS, and the standard will become ubiquitous. Its early to call a winner, but Microsoft's flabby innovation these days when contrasted with iPod's market dominance in digital music makes me nod toward Apple. And if Skype wins big as a result, thats cool with me. I just want one buddylist, and if the government isn't going to force interoperability, llike they should, then I am rooting for an instant messaging monopoly. And please, God, don't let it be Microsoft.
[tags: Skype, Jyve, vSkype, Spontania4IM, Stuart Henshall, iChat, iPod Phone, Yahoo Messenger, Microsoft, Proteus, Fire, Battle For The Livingroom, social+tools]
Comments (6)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology | Telecommunications
July 19, 2005
Blink ›
12 million Skype enterprise users
Niklas Zennstrom, co-founder of Skype, estimates that 30% of its 40 million customers are corporate users. via Financial Times Tag: skype
posted by Arieanna Foley |
|
# |
0 |
0
July 15, 2005
Posted by Arieanna Foley
News out from the FCC that the number of landlines in the US has officially been outstripped by cellphones. [Engadget]
"By the end of the year, there were 181.1 million cellphone subscribers, compared with 177.9 million access lines into U.S. homes and businesses, the Federal Communications Commission said in a biannual report."
Cellphones have already reached this peak in India, China, Norway and Sweden, to name a few. In Sweden there are actually more cellphone subscribers than inhabitants. Yes, that includes all age groups. So, given that some people don't use them at all, you're likely to find people out there with 2 or more cellphones. [Smartmobs]
Do you think landlines serve a purpose anymore? If so, what?
Technorati Tags: landlines, cellphones, telephony
Comments (3)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Telecommunications
June 29, 2005
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Motorola has announced the Motorola Ojo Personal Video Phone.

Ok, I am sold on webcams and video conferencing. I'm there. And I can't wait to be able to do it on my cell phone. My new Sony Ericsson s710a has streaming video and video recording capabilities already (psst... any Sony Ericsson or Cingular folks who read this and want my life to be more beautiful, please tell me how to get the damned thing to connect to the EDGE network, please). But the George Jetson-esque video phone, this Ojo thing, that requires a special service, and folks on both ends to have indentical devices? You must be kidding me.
The system requires you to plug the gizmo into a broadband modem (like a cable or DSL modem), and its not wireless:
[from FAQ page]
Q: What if my cable modem is in my upstairs office and I want Ojo in my kitchen downstairs? Is there any way I can put Ojo in my kitchen without relocating the modem there, too?
A: Consider using HomePlug® products that allow you to connect computers and other broadband devices through the electrical circuits in your home to your modem/router. Please view www.homeplug.com for more information about these products. Ojo video quality is likely to be less than optimal when connected through the electrical circuits in your home.
Oh, great. They don't even make it work through your phone lines, which would at least be convenient.
This one is destined for the ash heap.
Comments (8)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Telecommunications
June 14, 2005
Posted by Arieanna Foley
Yahoo! has had a frenzy of activity this year, and it's still early. It has just been announced that Yahoo has purchased dialpad, a VoIP provider. Rather funny since everyone has just been waiting for Yahoo to scoop up Skype. Well, right idea, wrong company.
Yahoo's purchase of Dialpad will give them fast entry to VoIP services on their own terms, rather than using the services of others (such as their past use of Net2Phone). As well as VoIP, Yahoo gains all of Dialpad's fraud management detection that can be made use of in other Yahoo areas.
So, we can see Yahoo moving all over the place to build an integrated space with value adds. Definitely moving much faster than either MSN or AOL. Wonder what kind of ripple effect this new acquisition will cause.
I caught wind of this news on Andy Abramson's blog, but Om Malik broke the news first.
Comments (2)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Business | Telecommunications
May 20, 2005
Posted by Arieanna Foley
So, it's been flying around the web. Yahoo does VoIP.
From Advanced IP Pipeline I first caught the news that Yahoo was unveiling a beta IM that supports voice calling - VoIP. It also includes other features such as voicemail that are comparative to those at Skype. Yahoo Messenger 7.0 has replaced the wold walkie-talkie voice component with a more true VoIP component - where conversation is unrestricted and open.
The calling features of v. 7.0 includes free PC-to-PC and messenger-to-messenger (buddy-to-buddy), as well as free voicemail and call history. Although it was not apparent at first, they also do PC-to-PSTN calling - calls to any end phone. Many people missed this fact (read below) and so many people were bashing Yahoo for saying they did VoIP without adding in the PC-to-PSTN component - without it, the release would have been more like VoIM.
Yahoo has minimized this aspect of the service in their press release package. And even in their website content, actually, as Tom Keating found out. Perhaps because it is not proprietary, but rather made possible through a third party, Net2Phone. Even then, it would be good to know, don't you think? Perhaps a bit more newsworthy than Pc-to-PC calling in the first place.
Here is the title of the press release on Business Wire: "Yahoo! Messenger Announces Free, High-Quality Worldwide Calling" - and yes, they do. PC-to-PC. Nothing in the release about PC-to-PSTN. The only area of the Yahoo Messenger or Yahoo Messenger Beta sites that actually contain the nugget of info that is the true BIG NEWS - the help pages. Go figure. I think Yahoo won themselves an unexpected amount of bad press. But we'll see how they recover.
Although off topic, the new Messenger has upgraded features such as better photo sharing, integration with 360 and spim control.
Comments (2)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology | Telecommunications
Blink ›
DSpeak
Oh boy, things are moving fast in VoIPland. At IGN.com, Craig Harris reports from E3 2005 "Earlier this week, we reported that Nintendo would be demonstrating something called DSpeak at its Electronic Entertainment Expo booth this week. After experiencing it hands-on, we can tell you what it is: Voice-over IP using the Nintendo DS' wireless and microphone capabilities." Just a concept demo, but this should create even more panic in the traditional phone companies. [pointer from Waxy.org] [tags: Nintendo DS, Dspeak]
posted by Stowe Boyd |
|
# |
0 |
0
May 12, 2005
Blink ›
Skype targets enterprise users with new partnership
Skype just announced a partnership with Fiberlink, a company developing voice-data solutions for enterprise mobility. Without all the legwork, they've successfully managed to get a leg into selling to corporate clients. Way to go Skype. I personally think it's a great move. I use Skype for most of my business contacts, for both voice and chat components. It's ability for multi-user chat and voice conference, not to mention the low-cost voice mail option, make Skype a great business tool. And, yes, this is despite the valid points about Skype's ability to use your resources given by Marc. From Om Malik
posted by Arieanna Foley |
|
# |
0 |
0
May 07, 2005
Posted by Arieanna Foley
I came across a news piece in the Globe & Mail outlining the expected regulation of VoIP services by the CRTC.
The ruling will likely impose the same regulations on VoIP that are currently imposed on regular phone services. However, the article hinted at a few other interesting things. If I am not mistaken, the regulation would not apply to all competitors in the marketplace, but specifically those from the telecommunications industry but not those in the cable industry.
I find it interesting that the argument was surrounding which player would be dominant in the VoIP market: cable services or telcos. The argument for regulation revolves around the definition of VoIP: is it a phone or Internet product? Those in favour of regulation want to ensure that the large telcos don't offer VoIP services below cost in order to attract attention - this is a cut, despite the fact that VoIP services are currently cutting their revenue through increased competition.
Although they hint at competition, there is no recognition of such services as Skype, one of the most widely recognized VoIP players in the market. It looks like Skype would also be unregulated in the new bill. I find it difficult to imagine myself going over to a telco for my VoIP services. Not out of loyalty to Skype, but simply because I don't use the telcos for anything at the moment. No landline or anything. So, low cost VoIP services bundled into other products would not attract me. With cable, perhaps, but I still don't think I'll be entertained to another product.
Part of my decision to stick with Skype is that I don't see any future product from either telco or cable provider to offer the same level of social connectivity. I use Skype everyday, and quite a lot during the day, but rarely for voice services. Although the option is great, as is the multi-person capability, I use it for my IM. Group chats, simple interface, easy to manage voice to chat switches. Just simple.
So, although the CRTC may be focusing on regulation as necessary to control the VoIP industry from the telco perspective, I would like to see the issue move from "how do we define VoIP" and "how do we control VoIP" to "How can we integrate VoIP with other useful products." Note how I said integrate. Not bundle. Bundles represent packages for discounts, not integrated services.
Tag: VoIP
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (5) | Category: Telecommunications
May 06, 2005
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Thought provoking take on Google's grand scheme from Mathieu Balez:
[from The Good God Google]
What we're talking about here is the eventual creation of a perfect digital record of your entire memory, at your fingertips and searchable, all emblazoned with the Google logo and, certainly, some pertinent and unobtrusive advertisement. Scary? Maybe a little.
It is also most likely developing a Google-branded version of Firefox -- the up-and-coming Web-browser. There is no dearth of well-supported evidence on the Web pointing to this fact. Having its own browser out there grants Google the opportunity to package all of its services in one tidy delivery channel. It also further encroaches upon Microsoft's territory.
Most significantly however, it will be the opening move on the chessboard of next-generation desktop computing. I believe Google is vying to dethrone Microsoft as the potentate of PC dominance by pulling the rug out from underneath its feet, by changing the very rules of the operating system game itself. Not unlike its e-mail and mapping software, which are entirely Web-based, Google will release an operating system that will be completely networked and centralized on its servers. You will literally no longer need any software running on your local computer (except the Google Web-browser of course, and a network connection). The computing experience will involve booting your computer, logging into the net, and having access to all your programs (and most of your data) which will reside happily in the ether -- all protected and secure, we will be assured, by the good god Google.
He also hypothesizes the acquisition of Skype or Teleo by Google, which is an advance that I favor, as an end user, personally. I have junked my Vonage contraption, and gone over wholeheartedly to Skype: I now have SkypeIn and SkypeOut capabilities, and use it many times everyday. Integration of Skype with other Google services -- like search, Gmail and so on -- would be a natural. Not to mention Google could then presence enable search results. Imagine you do a search on some topic "google skype rumors" and you find that Stowe Boyd has blogged about it. Then you see that Stowe is online (via Skype), and you opt to read the piece, and then IM Stowe via Skype for clarification on something he stated in the entry. He clarifies. You then could post the result of the IM as a comment in Stowe's blog, or email it to a friend via Gmail. Even more cool if you could post Skype voice-over-IP as comments or podcasts. Pretty compelling vision, and one that would make the apparent low rate of innovation around Blogger sensible, since they may be waiting for a large number of pieces to fall into place before doing anything radical.
[pointer from Robin Dindayal]
[tags: Google Skype Rumor]
Comments (3)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology | Telecommunications
May 01, 2005
Posted by Marc Eisenstadt
Stowe and I were having a quick catchup chat a few weeks back... starting with a bit of impromptu IM, but then wanting to branch off into a voice or voice/video session, or simply agree to do one 'later' given that we both had other pending gigs.... so Stowe asked for my Skype ID, and I mentioned that I had removed it from my machine, which prompted me to think that I'd better explain why!
I had found my machine encumbered by an alarmingly large number of attempted simultaneous TCP connections (enough to crash my browser at one point, and generally to slow down my machine, even though an 'open port' is not in-and-of itself alarming: it depends what happens on that port!), but looking around the web I found very few details to help me. Most items that I found expressing some modest concerns about Skype 'bandwidth' or 'CPU' usage were erroneously directed at the voice codec ('can it cope?', 'how much bandwidth does it use') and the encryption ('how much horsepower does it need'?). Those are the wrong worries: Skype is generally an awesome performer on both fronts, requiring pretty modest resources by today's standards (5Kbps for voice traffic, for example!). It's your machine's role in the big-picture P2P communications flow that you need to be worried about: think of your machine as a key hub for the world's voice traffic and you'll see what I'm talking about -- now that's something of an over-statement, but is closer to what you need to concentrate on, rather than the CPU-demands of the voice codec and encryption algorithm for your own personal calls!
Skype is the darling of industry, geeks, academics, and consumers, (hey, I'm a huge fan myself, sometimes wearing each of those four hats -- the dang thing is one of the greatest creations since sliced bread). But I couldn't believe that anything that was killing my machine could be so universally loved. Had I missed something? Lo and behold, a little more digging around brought a few more things to my attention.
Here are three sources of interest:
a) This highly technical article by Salman A. Baset and Henning Schulzrinne: "Analysis of the Skype Peer-to-Peer Internet Telephony Protocol". Here's a tiny excerpt to whet your appetite:
This report analyzes key Skype functions such as login, NAT and firewall traversal, call establishment, media transfer, codecs, and conferencing under three different network setups. Analysis is performed by careful study of Skype network traffic.
...
Like its file sharing predecessor KaZaa, Skype is an overlay peer-to-peer network. There are two types of nodes in this overlay network, ordinary hosts and super nodes (SN). An ordinary host is a Skype application that can be used to place voice calls and send text messages. A super node is an ordinary hosts end-point on the Skype network. Any node with a public IP address having sufficient CPU, memory, and network bandwidth is a candidate to become a super node. [emphasis mine]
b) A less technical article by Simson Garfinkel, "Can 9 Million Skype Users Be Wrong?", which says things like this:
"the Skype client running on your computer can and will relay calls between other network users without your knowledge. ... It makes sense that Skype would detect how much bandwidth you have... but... the algorithm that Skype uses to determine how much of this relaying it is allowed to engage in is proprietary, so we can't know for sure.
... The software has the capability of automatically updating and upgrading itself, allowing it to acquire new features at any timepotentially without the permission of the user. The software uses a secret protocol; all communications are encrypted. And Skype Technologies does its engineering in Tallinn, Estonia, has some business operations in London and registers its website in Amsterdam.
If I were going to write an information warfare thriller with a theme based on Invasion of the Body Snatchers, this is certainly where I would start. "
c) In-depth discussion of the Baset and Shulzrinne technical article in these Slashdot threads, including comments such as this one:
Calls made using the system are directed through 'Supernodes', which can be ordinary PC's with Skype installed. Machines on fast and well connected Internet feeds like the $Network are likely to automatically become 'Supernodes' and forward a considerable amount of traffic. This allows Skype to route other peoples Voice over IP calls using your
machine and the university internet connection.
There's a lot of argument about how much of a resource hog Skype really is (and various commenters dispute Garfinkel's auto-update/bodysnatcher worry). I have in fact re-installed Skype on my machine recently in order to run some of my own empirical tests, and will report back with the results in due course. It certainly opens a lot of TCP ports, but that's not necessarily a bad thing depending on what exactly happens on those ports, as I mentioned above. Right now, I have yet to get a definitive result, but I'll keep poking around. Intuitively, I can assert (un-scientifically) that Skype is so much of a killer on my machine that even though I love it madly, I have to un-install disable it on occasion (after which my machine behaves wonderfully all over again). That's not good. I'll try to come back with a more scientific analysis in the next couple of weeks, but in the meantime would love to hear from others who have done the controlled experiments!
[tags: skype, voip, p2p]
Comments (13)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Telecommunications
December 17, 2004
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology | Telecommunications
Posted by Stowe Boyd
In the middle of a softball interview by Gartner's Tom Austin, Ray makes an interesting point about how stupid the current phone system is because it doesn't include presence, when it easily could:
Ray Ozzie [from The Gartner Fellows: Ray Ozzie's Interview]
Notification and awareness is one of the most interesting uses of wireless devices that has yet to emerge. We're moving into a world of pervasive awareness, where you can control the publishing of awareness of your location, "projecting" to others your interruptability and the modes of communications that you find the most useful at the moment. For example -- when you're driving and have your hands on the wheel, you'd rather suggest to others that they call you rather than "texting" or emailing you. Or maybe they should just let you concentrate.
Projecting your interruptability to others might be really easy if we integrated our handheld wireless devices with our varied communication services. Take, for example, the phone. Why isn't it possible -- without navigating a million menus [which I guess means running an IM client on your phone] -- to slip a little button on the side to select one of four desired presence or interruptability states, customized to you: I'm in a meeting; I'm available to my "intimates"; I'm available for any interruptions; or "do not disturb". This state could be easily published by your wireless operator, through Web Services, to the on-line buddy list of your IM or email programs, or directly to other people's phones.
The rest of the interview honestly baffles me: a lot of looking back at the trends that have brought us to today, but not very much on where Groove might be heading. My current sense is that Groove has wound up in a niche -- a relatively big one, I grant -- supporting mobile groups that don't share a common server, such as the ad hoc interagency groups working in Homeland Security, but who need a secure file sharing platform. But honestly, the Groove add-on tools are a joke, and I can't fathom why Groove doesn't interoperate with other IM networks. With the lovey-dovey relationship they have with Microsoft, you'd expect at least MSN interop. These limitations -- along with the small market penetration -- makes using Groove relatively unattractive for anyone not in exactly the sweet spot for the product.
But the comments about phones and phones companies missing the boat on presence brings to mind something that came up in a phone conversation I had earlier this week with the CEO of Vonage, Jeffrey Citron. I had emailed him about the concept of an acquisition of Vonage by one of the established instant messaging networks. Initially, my interest was driven by the idea -- the power of fusing together the largest VoIP telephone company, with over 350,000 North American users with a public instant messaging network. He very carefully said something like "It would be inappropriate to discuss those rumors." Hmmm. That piqued my curiosity, of course.
But the discussion that followed was me trying to steer him toward IM integration, and him studiously staying away. We discussed the recent Viseon videophone announcement, and I pointed out that millions of webcams have already been sold, and are already running on PCs: why not build a desktop client for Vonage that leverages those. Citron argued that the quality of the webcams is uneven; well, sure. But there they are, and people use them already with the various IM services. So maybe its a strategy of not building stuff that your likely acquirers have already built?
On the otherside, taking use of smarter devices -- like a Vonage phone box that would use wifi or bluetooth to talk to portable or cell phones in range -- looks like something that is coming together. We may still have to fiddle with the menus -- there won't be a 'present and available' switch to satisfy Ray -- but we are getting closer, slowly, to a seamless integration of telephony and instant messaging. Although the stupid phones companies have blown the obvious advantages they had, and are leaving it open for the Vonages and Microsofts of the world to take it all over.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology | Telecommunications
December 09, 2004
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Vonage has announced a partnership with Viseon to combine Vonage VoIP telephony with Viseon's cool looking video telephone (very Jetsons).

My bet is that this won't go. Why doesn't Vonage just build a video IM client for the PC (not a softphone), that supports video? There are gazillions of webcams out there, and soon to be millions of cell phones that will support video. This is a device that won't fly.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Telecommunications
Posted by Stowe Boyd
In a recent email alert, ABI Research argues that the size of the instant messaging market will lead to acquisition of Vonage by Microsoft, AOL, or Yahoo:
Vamsi Sistla [pointer from Om Malik]
Millions of people use the big IM services. Some use their voice capabilities. But the experience is pretty horrible. You have to sit at a computer, use a microphone and speak loudly. And it goes over the public Internet, so quality is poor and security is suspect. Why aren't they doing anything about it? They have an established presence: why don't they buy out a Vonage, an Avaya or a Voiceglo, integrate their technology and start offering packages to existing and new subscribers? Isn't that a huge revenue opportunity for them?
Of course it is. On the other hand, AOL has fumbled its advantages with AIM so many times I have lost count: all they can think about is the on-going defection of AOL subscribers, and the use of AIM as a biollboard for advertising. Yahoo is similarly ambivalent about making money from IM is a businesslike way, and has retreated from the enterprise application of IM.
Microsoft, on the other hand, has designs to circumvent the traditional phone networks, just like Vonage is doing. That matchup seems made in heaven. We'll see, but Sistla may be onto something here.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Telecommunications
November 30, 2004
Posted by Stowe Boyd
In a move reminiscent of the deal that VHS backers made with the pornography industry to destablize the Mexican standoff with Betamax, Skype has made a deal with bad-boy peer-to-peer file sharing phenom Kazaa:
[from RED HERRING | Bride of Kazaa]
Skype, which is headquartered in Luxembourg, currently claims 30 million downloads, with 900,000 more downloads per week. Kazaa boasts 300 million users. Bob Hafner, an analyst with Gartner, says Skype gains more than numbers. The typical Kazaa user is precisely the customer Skype is looking for - early adopters looking for low-cost services. Since Skype's basic services are free, the company will depend on additional services to grab revenue. Skype recently introduced its SkypeOut prepay service, which for 2 cents a minute allows users to call traditional landline and cell phones. Though SkypeOut has just begun to win over users, Skype will continue to provide potential revenue-builders like a voicemail service and a SkypeIn telephone number to receive incoming calls.
Still, Skype may pay a price for its new customer base, as Kazaa's legal past could bring trouble for the VoIP firm. Sowmyanarayan Sampath, a consultant with management and strategy firm Adventis, compares bundling Kazaa with Skype to giving away candy in cigarette packages. "Inserting a product with no legal issues into a product of legal issues will give you problems," he says.
Hmmm. 300 million users later, the problems may seem relatively small.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Telecommunications
October 20, 2004
Posted by Stowe Boyd
The long-rumored Microsoft "Istanbul" has been leaked to the press:
the Associated Press
[from Microsoft to Debut 'Istanbul' Application]
BOSTON (AP) -- Microsoft Corp. introduced on Tuesday a desktop computer application that aims to seamlessly integrate e-mail, instant messaging, video conferencing, traditional phone service and Internet-based calling.
Microsoft plans to debut the product, code-named "Istanbul," sometime in the first half of 2005. It will compete with efforts from rivals including IBM Corp. and smaller players such as Convoq Inc. to link together various channels of communications and promote their most effective use.
The products employ "presence" technology, which tells users whether co-workers are online and their degree of availability -- whether they can take a phone call or prefer to be e-mailed or to instead join a Web conference, for example.
The idea is to enhance the "buddy list" concept of instant messaging so workers can choose how to best communicate in a given moment, bringing an end to games of phone tag in a world of packed schedules.
Dear God, I hope we can stop putting terms like presence and buddy list in scare quotes at some point.
For those who have been talking to the folks at Microsoft, this is no surprise, as I said here recently, although a lot of so-called Microsoft watchers were still in the dark last week.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology | Telecommunications
October 12, 2004
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Microsoft has everyone stymied regarding its plans for VOiP:
Ellen Muraskin [from Microsoft's Looming VON Announcement: Not VOIP?
I'm damned if I can figure out what Microsoft Corp. is going to announce with the first, most prominent keynote of all at this month's Voice on the Net [VON] show, if not telephony links to its LCS (Live Communications Server). The keynoter is Anoop Gupta, corporate vice president of Microsoft's real-time collaboration business unit -- the one charged with LCS.
The "tattler" leaks reported by Mary Jo Foley support my hunch, even as she gets an official denial from Redmond. Maybe there's some technicality here we're missing?
I am betraying no confidences by stating the obvious: Microsoft has always asserted the key role of telephony integrated into its collaboration strategy of LCS. Read the briefs that I wrote last year, based on interviews and meetings with Gurdeep Pal ( First Take: Live Communications Server, and Real-Time Revolution)
[from Real-Time Revolution]
G[urdeep Singh Pal]: Yes. That's why CTI (Computer Telephony Integration) crashed and burned. Even at Microsoft, we tried like 23 goes at CTI, but they failed because they didn't integrate with what was already there. They used a separate address book, they had no idea of presence: it was a totally different user experience. But imagine instead the example we had before, where the pawn associated with the paragraph's author could also allow you to right-click and dial -- I would be able to get them, without even having to know what phone they were using, or the number. Again: applying the same user experience makes it easy.
S[towe Boyd]: You are starting to dig into another theme I wanted to ask about: the increasingly clever devices that folks are using, and how they can incrementally improve things. A friend of mine has a Bluetooth enabled cell phone, and when it rings, the Outlook contact pops up on his Bluetooth enabled PC. He already understands how to use Outlook, he knows how to use his cell phone, and now they provide a higher-order value through this in-context integration. I know, obviously that Microsoft is involved in many initiatives clever devices: PocketPC, Smartphones, tablet PCs, game machines, and who knows what else. So how does that vision converge with the vision in collaboration technologies?
G: There are going to be some devices that will be more mobile, always with you. And you want to allow collaboration on that device to the extent of the fidelity possible on that the device. You won't want to bring down the fidelity of the entire collaboration session just to the least common denominator.
S: You don't want to force everyone to use WAP just because one guy is on his cell phone.
G: Right. One very important case for us is PDAs and Smartphones, and not particularly smart phones, too. We have a number of critical partnerships, specific development we are doing, and some research we are doing in Microsoft Beijing.
So I predict a big announcement at VON, where Microsoft throws off the wrappers, and unveils a truly revolutionary integration of LCS with telephony, especially involving smart presence on telephones and other wireless devices.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Telecommunications
September 10, 2004
Posted by Gregory Narain
For anyone that doesn't use Skype, it is an Internet-enabled phone service much like Vonage, Packet 8, and the like. The main difference is that out of the box, Skype does not route through traditional phone lines. Instead, both parties install the software and then talk to their heart's content - FOR FREE.
That alone would not be very impressive. Skype also adds in a simple contact manager / IM client that lets you see who's online, place calls, and conference people in as you desire. That's a nice trick. Another great trick is the Skype Out feature. With Skype Out, you can use your Internet-enabled computer to make calls to regular phone numbers, for a relatively small per minute charge.
Skype has now released their newest feature, a Pocket PC version of their application. The marvel of this is that now, with a handheld and WiFi, your PDA has become your cell phone, at least in part.
Truth be told, this is a different form of convergence. We've grown accustomed to the talk of the consolidation of devices and roles. In general, most of that talk focuses on how our cameras will eat our MP3 players will eat our cell phones. Products like Skype, and VOIP technology as a whole, are really demonstrating how software will contribute to that unification.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Telecommunications
September 02, 2004
Posted by Stowe Boyd
I am really excited about a new event that I am honored to be involved in: Corante's Real Time Collaboration Experience held in collaboration with Inbox East.
The Inbox conference runs 17-19 November 2004, and will be held in Atlanta's Cobb Galleria Centre.
The Experience involves a workshop and trade show pavilion, and will be held on the morning of 19 November. Be sure to register with this code -- CRTE04 -- to get a $100 discount!
I have asked my old pal, David Coleman of Collaborative Strategies to play the role of co-host, so we should be having an illegal amount of fun there. Here's the current prospectus, such as it is: THE WORKSHOP
Your Host: Stowe Boyd, Corante
Co-Host: David Coleman, Collaboratives Strategies
Setting Context: The Wheel of Real-Time Collaboration
Stowe will be leading the workshop using his 'late show' format, involving short and focused presentations, strong reliance on interview and dialog, and demos of breakthrough technologies. In this first session, he lays out a conceptual framework for real-time technology and its impact on today's world.
Market Trends in Real-Time Collaboration
David Coleman will present various trends in the real-time marketplace and their relevance to the enterprise and individual.
The World That Instant Messaging Is Making: New Directions in IM
Stowe and David will discuss and demonstrate a number of innovative instant messaging technologies.
Convergence and Collision: From Apps to Stacks
This session is devoted to the convergence of technologies like IM, web conferencing, voice, video, content, and other real-time collaboration apps into complex enterprise architecture stacks. It will include 'policy/vision' statements from major industry representatives.
Real-Time Social Tools
This session is devoted to the convergence of real-time collaboration into social media and social tools. It will demonstrate a wide variety of real-time social software.
Summary: A Roadmap for Real-Time
This wrap-up session by David Coleman is devoted to detailing a roadmap for the enterprise adoption of real-time collaboration technologies, and then a final wrap-up by the host, Stowe Boyd.
Note: attendees will receive an executive report of the same name, co-authored by the Host and Co-host.
This is in a sense the first real official announcement about Corante Events, about which we will have a lot more to say in the upcoming weeks. We intend to launch a wide variety of real and virtual events over the next few months, and we invite our contributors and readers to help us to make them innovative, timely, and rewarding.
And remember, if you're signing up for Inbox be sure to include the registration code - CRTE04 - to get a $100 discount!
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Corante | Telecommunications
August 09, 2004
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Really good synopsis of the stupidity surrounding the FBI's recent blundering around in VoIP land:
Declan McCullagh [from Fahrenheit FBI]
You've been saying that terrorists may use VoIP services to "evade lawful electronic surveillance." But the only detailed court statistics available show that 77 percent of wiretap applications were for drug crimes, and terrorism-related offenses were so few they didn't even make the chart. Is terrorism the real reason behind your wiretap push?
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology | Telecommunications
August 06, 2004
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Dan Gillmor states that the emperor has no clothes, in the recent FCC support for federal wiretap rules on all Internet VoIP:
Dan Gillmor [from FCC Says Software Must be Open to FBI]
This is a stunningly bad decision, and it is going to take us down a road we've already traveled.
It ignores reality. Consider Skype, which encrypts calls from end to end. It runs on peer-to-peer networks. In other words, law enforcement can't eavesdrop -- because VOIP is, for all practical purposes, a software application.
Unless we have new laws banning the private use of strong encryption, the FCC/FBI alliance here just means the bad guys will move their communications -- if they haven't already -- to services that can't be tapped. Then, only average folks will be monitored.
My guess is that we're going to have to fight the encryption battle all over again. The government really doesn't believe in free (as in freedom) communications. This will get ugly.
Yet another case of stupidity in high places.
The inevitable attempt to take control of communication channels by those who believe that the need for collective security outweighs our need for personal liberty.
[Update: Stuart Henshall has a long post on this insanity at Unbound Spiral]
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Law | Telecommunications
July 30, 2004
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Had I only known about SkypeOut (where Skype supports calling out to plain vanilla phones) two weeks ago, I would have saved a bucket of Euros making calls back to the States. Of course, that would have been a savings over the exorbitant hotel phone charges I was looking at. There has been a lot of fuming about SkypeOut rates, and especially the shift since the beta (see Stuart Henshall, for example), but the image of me calling home through my laptop from Starbucks in London is very pleasant. (Of course, I couldn't connect wirelessly at Starbucks, but that was because I was infected by SearchV, but that's a different story.)

Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Telecommunications
June 04, 2004
Posted by Gregory Narain
The use of VOIP is growing more and more in various different contexts. Consumers received a new form of relief today as Vonage, one of the dominant players in the consumer VOIP marketplace announced a $50 rebate on their installation/setup package.
[from News.com, "Vonage slashes price of Net telephony kit"]
The kit, which includes a Motorola phone adapter, is now $30 at Circuit City, Fry's and RadioShack after a $50 mail-in rebate, Vonage said Wednesday. The starter kit, which consists of an adapter and two months of free Vonage service, used to cost $100 at the same stores.
As Vonage's subscriber numbers grow, it has a greater ability to pass on savings to its customers, according to company Vice President Matthew Deatrick. Vonage made a similar argument in mid-May, when it signed up its 150,000th subscriber, saying it had reached an "inflection point" that allowed it to lower the cost of monthly unlimited North American dialing from $35 to $30 a month.
This is in addition to Vonage's recently inked distribution deal with Radio Shack, not to mention an alliance with another landline provider. Price drops aside, I am most enthused to see that a VOIP has such widespread distribution channels already in place. 150K subscribers is still just a blip on the radar, however, its still encouraging.
The only thing to look out for now, unfortunately, is the governments attempts to normalize this new technology into archaic paradigms they can relate to. Vonage is already partially getting served some cold tea in New York but they aren't standing still.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Telecommunications
May 26, 2004
Posted by Gregory Narain
John Dowdell points to an interesting research project being conducted at HP Labs, the SpeechBot. As the site describes, "SpeechBot is a search engine for audio & video content that is hosted and played from other websites".
Digging a little deeper into the technical documentation for SpeechBot, I came across this summary:
SpeechBot (http://www.compaq.com/speechbot) is the first Internet search site for indexing streaming spoken audio on the web. Unlike previous attempts to index spoken audio on the Web, which have relied on either adjacent text, metadata, or hand supplied transcripts and close captions, SpeechBot uses automatic speech recognition technology to transcribe and index documents that do not have transcripts or other content information. The use of speech recognition permits the efficient and cost-effective indexing of thousands of hours of audio content, which were previously inaccessible. Because of this indexing, SpeechBot allows users to quickly search for relevant content in long audio documents and yields a high precision on first page-retrieved items.
SpeechBot indexes streaming media files based on their content, much as conventional search sites index ordinary Web pages by their text content. Like conventional search sites, SpeechBot does not store or serve the multimedia files themselves, but rather provides users with links. SpeechBots current index has over 3200 shows, 3500 hours of audio and 20 million words. The index is continually updated using SpeechBots highly scalable architecture.
...continue reading.
Comments (2)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Technology | Telecommunications
April 23, 2004
Posted by Stowe Boyd
Looks like Skype p2p VOIP is getting integrated into Kazaa. Is that a killer combination, or just a way to force the government to intercede into VoIP?
Don't forget that Skype is both a VoIP system *and* instant messaging client. Presence-enabling Kazaa file sharing seems like a no-brainer (I wonder why that hasn't been done already). My worry is that Kazaa's messes will tarnish anything that comes into contact with it, so p2p in general, VoIP telephony and instant messaging are all going to become slightly more disreputable becuase of this.
Andy Abramson [from [ VoIP Watch: SKYPE Gets More P2P Like]
Reports in BoardWatch are that Skype is working with the current parent of Kazaa to integrate a file sharing on a P2P basis. Ouch.
That could be the fastest way to get the regulators into the fray once copyrighted content starts being moved back and forth, in my opinion.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category:
|